Perception and production of /r/ allophones improve with hearing from a cochlear implant

Tongue shape can vary greatly for allophones of /r/ produced in different phonetic contexts but the primary acoustic cue used by listeners, lowered F3, remains stable. For the current study, it was hypothesized that auditory feedback maintains the speech motor control mechanisms that are constrainin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2047/d20000860
id ndltd-NEU--neu-332260
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-NEU--neu-3322602016-04-25T16:14:52ZPerception and production of /r/ allophones improve with hearing from a cochlear implantTongue shape can vary greatly for allophones of /r/ produced in different phonetic contexts but the primary acoustic cue used by listeners, lowered F3, remains stable. For the current study, it was hypothesized that auditory feedback maintains the speech motor control mechanisms that are constraining acoustic variability of F3 in /r/; thus the listener’s percept remains /r/ despite the range of articulatory configurations employed by the speaker. Given the potential importance of auditory feedback, postlingually deafened speakers should show larger acoustic variation in /r/ allophones than hearing controls, and auditory feedback from a cochlear implant could reduce that variation over time. To test these hypotheses, measures were made of phoneme perception and of production of tokens containing /r/, stop consonants, and /r/+stop clusters in hearing controls and in eight postlingually deafened adults pre- and postimplant. Postimplant, seven of the eight implant speakers did not differ from the control mean. It was also found that implant users’ production of stop and stop+/r/ blend improved with time but the measured acoustic contrast between these was still better in the control speakers than for the implant group even after the implant users had experienced a year of improved auditory feedback.http://hdl.handle.net/2047/d20000860
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
description Tongue shape can vary greatly for allophones of /r/ produced in different phonetic contexts but the primary acoustic cue used by listeners, lowered F3, remains stable. For the current study, it was hypothesized that auditory feedback maintains the speech motor control mechanisms that are constraining acoustic variability of F3 in /r/; thus the listener’s percept remains /r/ despite the range of articulatory configurations employed by the speaker. Given the potential importance of auditory feedback, postlingually deafened speakers should show larger acoustic variation in /r/ allophones than hearing controls, and auditory feedback from a cochlear implant could reduce that variation over time. To test these hypotheses, measures were made of phoneme perception and of production of tokens containing /r/, stop consonants, and /r/+stop clusters in hearing controls and in eight postlingually deafened adults pre- and postimplant. Postimplant, seven of the eight implant speakers did not differ from the control mean. It was also found that implant users’ production of stop and stop+/r/ blend improved with time but the measured acoustic contrast between these was still better in the control speakers than for the implant group even after the implant users had experienced a year of improved auditory feedback.
title Perception and production of /r/ allophones improve with hearing from a cochlear implant
spellingShingle Perception and production of /r/ allophones improve with hearing from a cochlear implant
title_short Perception and production of /r/ allophones improve with hearing from a cochlear implant
title_full Perception and production of /r/ allophones improve with hearing from a cochlear implant
title_fullStr Perception and production of /r/ allophones improve with hearing from a cochlear implant
title_full_unstemmed Perception and production of /r/ allophones improve with hearing from a cochlear implant
title_sort perception and production of /r/ allophones improve with hearing from a cochlear implant
publishDate
url http://hdl.handle.net/2047/d20000860
_version_ 1718235827162578944