Emerging judicial power in transitional democracies: Malawi, Tanzania and Uganda.

It is broadly accepted that an independent and empowered judiciary is central to the rule of law. This dissertation examines the construction of judicial power in emerging democracies through addressing the paradoxical presence of strong judicial power in weak and volatile democracies. I argue that...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2047/d10016120
id ndltd-NEU--neu-1885
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-NEU--neu-18852021-05-25T05:10:21ZEmerging judicial power in transitional democracies: Malawi, Tanzania and Uganda.It is broadly accepted that an independent and empowered judiciary is central to the rule of law. This dissertation examines the construction of judicial power in emerging democracies through addressing the paradoxical presence of strong judicial power in weak and volatile democracies. I argue that we must unpack our assumptions about democracy and move beyond regime based theories of judicial behavior. I find that existing strategic decision-making theories do not adequately account for the emergence of judicial power in sub-Saharan Africa. Instead this study finds that variation in level of judicial institutionalization or viability accounts for the presence of strong judicial power in weak democracies. A judiciary with a high level of institutional viability is able to withstand the frequent exogenous shocks typically present in sub-Saharan Africa's neopatrimonial regimes.http://hdl.handle.net/2047/d10016120
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
description It is broadly accepted that an independent and empowered judiciary is central to the rule of law. This dissertation examines the construction of judicial power in emerging democracies through addressing the paradoxical presence of strong judicial power in weak and volatile democracies. I argue that we must unpack our assumptions about democracy and move beyond regime based theories of judicial behavior. I find that existing strategic decision-making theories do not adequately account for the emergence of judicial power in sub-Saharan Africa. Instead this study finds that variation in level of judicial institutionalization or viability accounts for the presence of strong judicial power in weak democracies. A judiciary with a high level of institutional viability is able to withstand the frequent exogenous shocks typically present in sub-Saharan Africa's neopatrimonial regimes.
title Emerging judicial power in transitional democracies: Malawi, Tanzania and Uganda.
spellingShingle Emerging judicial power in transitional democracies: Malawi, Tanzania and Uganda.
title_short Emerging judicial power in transitional democracies: Malawi, Tanzania and Uganda.
title_full Emerging judicial power in transitional democracies: Malawi, Tanzania and Uganda.
title_fullStr Emerging judicial power in transitional democracies: Malawi, Tanzania and Uganda.
title_full_unstemmed Emerging judicial power in transitional democracies: Malawi, Tanzania and Uganda.
title_sort emerging judicial power in transitional democracies: malawi, tanzania and uganda.
publishDate
url http://hdl.handle.net/2047/d10016120
_version_ 1719406114876948480