effects of varying response requirements on reinforcer potency

The current study evaluated the effects of a progressive fixed ratio (FR) schedule of reinforcement on response rate. This study also attempted to identify the optimal schedule of reinforcement to maintain high rates of responding while avoiding satiation for two children diagnosed with autism and o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2047/d20003241
id ndltd-NEU--neu-1002
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-NEU--neu-10022021-05-25T05:09:20Zeffects of varying response requirements on reinforcer potencyThe current study evaluated the effects of a progressive fixed ratio (FR) schedule of reinforcement on response rate. This study also attempted to identify the optimal schedule of reinforcement to maintain high rates of responding while avoiding satiation for two children diagnosed with autism and one typically developing child. Following a paired stimulus preference assessment a progressive ratio reinforcer assessment was conducted. Ratio strain was observed for two participants. An unexpected result was observed for the third participant, a decreasing rate of response during the FR20 condition suggests habituation. A dishabituation probe that led to an increase in responding was conducted supporting this conclusion.http://hdl.handle.net/2047/d20003241
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
description The current study evaluated the effects of a progressive fixed ratio (FR) schedule of reinforcement on response rate. This study also attempted to identify the optimal schedule of reinforcement to maintain high rates of responding while avoiding satiation for two children diagnosed with autism and one typically developing child. Following a paired stimulus preference assessment a progressive ratio reinforcer assessment was conducted. Ratio strain was observed for two participants. An unexpected result was observed for the third participant, a decreasing rate of response during the FR20 condition suggests habituation. A dishabituation probe that led to an increase in responding was conducted supporting this conclusion.
title effects of varying response requirements on reinforcer potency
spellingShingle effects of varying response requirements on reinforcer potency
title_short effects of varying response requirements on reinforcer potency
title_full effects of varying response requirements on reinforcer potency
title_fullStr effects of varying response requirements on reinforcer potency
title_full_unstemmed effects of varying response requirements on reinforcer potency
title_sort effects of varying response requirements on reinforcer potency
publishDate
url http://hdl.handle.net/2047/d20003241
_version_ 1719405645490290688