Quantifying a daily light integral for warm-season putting green species

<p>A major constraint for ultradwarf bermudagrass (<i>Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers. x C. transvaalensis</i>) putting green cultivars is poor performance under reduced light environments (RLEs) due to the overall poor shade tolerance of bermudagrass. The objectives of this research we...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hodges, Benton Prichard
Other Authors: Christian Baldwin
Format: Others
Language:en
Published: MSSTATE 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://sun.library.msstate.edu/ETD-db/theses/available/etd-10272014-144026/
id ndltd-MSSTATE-oai-library.msstate.edu-etd-10272014-144026
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-MSSTATE-oai-library.msstate.edu-etd-10272014-1440262015-03-17T15:55:00Z Quantifying a daily light integral for warm-season putting green species Hodges, Benton Prichard Plant and Soil Sciences <p>A major constraint for ultradwarf bermudagrass (<i>Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers. x C. transvaalensis</i>) putting green cultivars is poor performance under reduced light environments (RLEs) due to the overall poor shade tolerance of bermudagrass. The objectives of this research were to quantify a daily light integral (DLI) requirement for warm-season putting green cultivar establishment, quantify a DLI requirement for established warm-season putting green cultivars, and identify differences in plant responses of warm-season putting green cultivars under RLEs during establishment and for established turf stands, as well. Using regression analysis, DLI requirements were generated to quantify the amount of light needed to reach 70% cover during warm-season putting green cultivar establishment, and to quantify the amount of light needed to maintain commercially acceptable turf quality for established warm-season putting green cultivars. Other plant responses were measured under various light regimes for each study.</p> Christian Baldwin Barry Stewart James McCurdy Maria Tomaso-Peterson Eugene Blythe MSSTATE 2014-11-24 text application/pdf http://sun.library.msstate.edu/ETD-db/theses/available/etd-10272014-144026/ http://sun.library.msstate.edu/ETD-db/theses/available/etd-10272014-144026/ en unrestricted I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, Dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to Mississippi State University Libraries or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, Dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, Dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, Dissertation, or project report.
collection NDLTD
language en
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Plant and Soil Sciences
spellingShingle Plant and Soil Sciences
Hodges, Benton Prichard
Quantifying a daily light integral for warm-season putting green species
description <p>A major constraint for ultradwarf bermudagrass (<i>Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers. x C. transvaalensis</i>) putting green cultivars is poor performance under reduced light environments (RLEs) due to the overall poor shade tolerance of bermudagrass. The objectives of this research were to quantify a daily light integral (DLI) requirement for warm-season putting green cultivar establishment, quantify a DLI requirement for established warm-season putting green cultivars, and identify differences in plant responses of warm-season putting green cultivars under RLEs during establishment and for established turf stands, as well. Using regression analysis, DLI requirements were generated to quantify the amount of light needed to reach 70% cover during warm-season putting green cultivar establishment, and to quantify the amount of light needed to maintain commercially acceptable turf quality for established warm-season putting green cultivars. Other plant responses were measured under various light regimes for each study.</p>
author2 Christian Baldwin
author_facet Christian Baldwin
Hodges, Benton Prichard
author Hodges, Benton Prichard
author_sort Hodges, Benton Prichard
title Quantifying a daily light integral for warm-season putting green species
title_short Quantifying a daily light integral for warm-season putting green species
title_full Quantifying a daily light integral for warm-season putting green species
title_fullStr Quantifying a daily light integral for warm-season putting green species
title_full_unstemmed Quantifying a daily light integral for warm-season putting green species
title_sort quantifying a daily light integral for warm-season putting green species
publisher MSSTATE
publishDate 2014
url http://sun.library.msstate.edu/ETD-db/theses/available/etd-10272014-144026/
work_keys_str_mv AT hodgesbentonprichard quantifyingadailylightintegralforwarmseasonputtinggreenspecies
_version_ 1716732253820682240