Performance of upland cotton (<I>Gossypium hirusutum</I>) in reniform (<I>Rotylenchulus reniformis</I>) nematode infested soils as affected by variety and seed treatment

<p>Reniform nematode (<I>Rotylenchulus reniformis</I> Linford and Oliveira) currently infests about 36% of the Mississippi <I>G. hirsutum</I> acres causing economic losses of $130 million annually. For more than 40 years nematodes, including <I>R. reniformis</I...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Smith, Harry Randall
Other Authors: David J. Lang
Format: Others
Language:en
Published: MSSTATE 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:http://sun.library.msstate.edu/ETD-db/theses/available/etd-03212016-182734/
id ndltd-MSSTATE-oai-library.msstate.edu-etd-03212016-182734
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-MSSTATE-oai-library.msstate.edu-etd-03212016-1827342016-07-15T15:48:16Z Performance of upland cotton (<I>Gossypium hirusutum</I>) in reniform (<I>Rotylenchulus reniformis</I>) nematode infested soils as affected by variety and seed treatment Smith, Harry Randall Plant and Soil Sciences <p>Reniform nematode (<I>Rotylenchulus reniformis</I> Linford and Oliveira) currently infests about 36% of the Mississippi <I>G. hirsutum</I> acres causing economic losses of $130 million annually. For more than 40 years nematodes, including <I>R. reniformis</I>, have been managed using an at-planting treatment of Temik 15G or with soil fumigants like Telone II. With the label loss of Temik 15G and expense of soil fumigants, there is a need to develop an integrated nematode management program centered around nematicide seed treatments (NST) with and without foliar applications of Vydate C-LV. In addition there is a need to better understand how new cotton cultivars provide improved growth, development and yield in nematode infested fields. Results from research at Auburn and Mississippi State Universities revealed tested varieties responded positively to NST and improved growth and yield without NST was variety specific especially early in G. hirsutum development (between nodes 1-9). Cutivars Phy 499, FM 1740 and Stv 5458 showed the greatest nematode tolerance while Phy 375 WRF had the least tolerance, benefitting greatly from NST. Trials involving NST with and without Vydate C-LV indicated yield of plants treated with Temik 15G was greater than plants treated with NST treatments. Aeris + Votivo with and without Vydate C-LV provided better plant growth and yield than Aeris alone or with Vydate C-LV. Relative to yield Vydate C-LV treatments increased pounds of lint cotton/acre across all treatments. There were no differences in fruit retention at fruiting site one during the square period with fruit loss primarily occurring between bloom and open boll. Vydate C-LV treatments increased overall fruit retention compared to all nematicide seed treatments making them comparable to Temik 15G. </p> David J. Lang Patricia R. Knight Michael S. Cox Kathy S. Lawrence Richard L. Harkess Gary W. Lawrence MSSTATE 2016-04-18 text application/pdf http://sun.library.msstate.edu/ETD-db/theses/available/etd-03212016-182734/ http://sun.library.msstate.edu/ETD-db/theses/available/etd-03212016-182734/ en unrestricted I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, Dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to Mississippi State University Libraries or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, Dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, Dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, Dissertation, or project report.
collection NDLTD
language en
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Plant and Soil Sciences
spellingShingle Plant and Soil Sciences
Smith, Harry Randall
Performance of upland cotton (<I>Gossypium hirusutum</I>) in reniform (<I>Rotylenchulus reniformis</I>) nematode infested soils as affected by variety and seed treatment
description <p>Reniform nematode (<I>Rotylenchulus reniformis</I> Linford and Oliveira) currently infests about 36% of the Mississippi <I>G. hirsutum</I> acres causing economic losses of $130 million annually. For more than 40 years nematodes, including <I>R. reniformis</I>, have been managed using an at-planting treatment of Temik 15G or with soil fumigants like Telone II. With the label loss of Temik 15G and expense of soil fumigants, there is a need to develop an integrated nematode management program centered around nematicide seed treatments (NST) with and without foliar applications of Vydate C-LV. In addition there is a need to better understand how new cotton cultivars provide improved growth, development and yield in nematode infested fields. Results from research at Auburn and Mississippi State Universities revealed tested varieties responded positively to NST and improved growth and yield without NST was variety specific especially early in G. hirsutum development (between nodes 1-9). Cutivars Phy 499, FM 1740 and Stv 5458 showed the greatest nematode tolerance while Phy 375 WRF had the least tolerance, benefitting greatly from NST. Trials involving NST with and without Vydate C-LV indicated yield of plants treated with Temik 15G was greater than plants treated with NST treatments. Aeris + Votivo with and without Vydate C-LV provided better plant growth and yield than Aeris alone or with Vydate C-LV. Relative to yield Vydate C-LV treatments increased pounds of lint cotton/acre across all treatments. There were no differences in fruit retention at fruiting site one during the square period with fruit loss primarily occurring between bloom and open boll. Vydate C-LV treatments increased overall fruit retention compared to all nematicide seed treatments making them comparable to Temik 15G. </p>
author2 David J. Lang
author_facet David J. Lang
Smith, Harry Randall
author Smith, Harry Randall
author_sort Smith, Harry Randall
title Performance of upland cotton (<I>Gossypium hirusutum</I>) in reniform (<I>Rotylenchulus reniformis</I>) nematode infested soils as affected by variety and seed treatment
title_short Performance of upland cotton (<I>Gossypium hirusutum</I>) in reniform (<I>Rotylenchulus reniformis</I>) nematode infested soils as affected by variety and seed treatment
title_full Performance of upland cotton (<I>Gossypium hirusutum</I>) in reniform (<I>Rotylenchulus reniformis</I>) nematode infested soils as affected by variety and seed treatment
title_fullStr Performance of upland cotton (<I>Gossypium hirusutum</I>) in reniform (<I>Rotylenchulus reniformis</I>) nematode infested soils as affected by variety and seed treatment
title_full_unstemmed Performance of upland cotton (<I>Gossypium hirusutum</I>) in reniform (<I>Rotylenchulus reniformis</I>) nematode infested soils as affected by variety and seed treatment
title_sort performance of upland cotton (<i>gossypium hirusutum</i>) in reniform (<i>rotylenchulus reniformis</i>) nematode infested soils as affected by variety and seed treatment
publisher MSSTATE
publishDate 2016
url http://sun.library.msstate.edu/ETD-db/theses/available/etd-03212016-182734/
work_keys_str_mv AT smithharryrandall performanceofuplandcottonigossypiumhirusutumiinreniformirotylenchulusreniformisinematodeinfestedsoilsasaffectedbyvarietyandseedtreatment
_version_ 1718350058260267008