Strategy, implementation, and state-building: Why governance failed after the post-2011 drawdown of US forces from Iraq?

<p>In this thesis I argue that US Military and Civilian leadership in Iraq, while both well-trained and well-intentioned, implemented a failed strategy that sought to fill institutional gaps within various national and sub-national governmental entities. This strategy provided short-term gains...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Baxter, Charles Allen
Other Authors: Brian D. Shoup
Format: Others
Language:en
Published: MSSTATE 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:http://sun.library.msstate.edu/ETD-db/theses/available/etd-03142019-071328/
Description
Summary:<p>In this thesis I argue that US Military and Civilian leadership in Iraq, while both well-trained and well-intentioned, implemented a failed strategy that sought to fill institutional gaps within various national and sub-national governmental entities. This strategy provided short-term gains by increasing the capacity and capability of Iraqs government to deliver public goods and services to its citizens thereby improving government legitimacy. Yet, in the long-term, a largely decentralized approach to development, a maladaptive transition plan, and an illusory estimate of the capacity of the security apparatus within Iraq proved detrimental to the broader US strategic objectives and state-building efforts in Iraq.</p>