Sustainable cropping systems for the Northern Great Plains: energetic and economic considerations

Reliance on non-renewable resources is among the fundamental challenges to agricultural sustainability. Quantification of inputs in units of embodied fossil energy offers insight into sustainable use of these resources. Metrics of intensity, efficiency of non-renewable energy inputs to agriculture h...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Burgess, Macdonald Hugh
Language:en
Published: 2012
Online Access:http://etd.lib.montana.edu/etd/2012/burgess/BurgessMH0512.pdf
id ndltd-MONTSTATE-http---etd.lib.montana.edu-etd-2012-burgess-BurgessMH0512.pdf
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-MONTSTATE-http---etd.lib.montana.edu-etd-2012-burgess-BurgessMH0512.pdf2012-07-10T03:10:39Z Sustainable cropping systems for the Northern Great Plains: energetic and economic considerations Burgess, Macdonald Hugh Reliance on non-renewable resources is among the fundamental challenges to agricultural sustainability. Quantification of inputs in units of embodied fossil energy offers insight into sustainable use of these resources. Metrics of intensity, efficiency of non-renewable energy inputs to agriculture have been proposed for optimization in search of sustainability in the face of energy scarcity. Such analyses have found controversial results however, and further theoretical understanding is necessary. The research presented here focuses on approaches to sustainability targeting the semiarid northern Great Plains of North America. The 4 million ha of cropland fallowed in this region every year represent both a challenge to sustainability and an opportunity to address that challenge. Long identified as unsustainable when accomplished by tillage and without fertilizer input, the summerfallow-wheat crop production system is also energy-efficient by definitions that do not account for changes in soil fertility. It is shown here that accounting for lost soil N as an energy input to crop production partially resolves this paradox, but no strategy for energetic valuation of systems that build soil quality is apparent. Alternatives to summerfallow considered here include pulse crops (e.g. pea and lentil) grown for grain, forage, or as cover crops. In research conducted on farms already growing pulses, the largest effect on cropping system energy productivity was due to increased wheat yield rather than a reduction of inputs. In plot-scale research addressing a wider variety of production practices, neither system-level energy intensity nor productivity provided more insight into energy price exposure than basic economic analyses. 'Co-authored by Perry R. Miller and Clain A. Jones.' 2012-05-15 Dissertation Montana State University en http://etd.lib.montana.edu/etd/2012/burgess/BurgessMH0512.pdf
collection NDLTD
language en
sources NDLTD
description Reliance on non-renewable resources is among the fundamental challenges to agricultural sustainability. Quantification of inputs in units of embodied fossil energy offers insight into sustainable use of these resources. Metrics of intensity, efficiency of non-renewable energy inputs to agriculture have been proposed for optimization in search of sustainability in the face of energy scarcity. Such analyses have found controversial results however, and further theoretical understanding is necessary. The research presented here focuses on approaches to sustainability targeting the semiarid northern Great Plains of North America. The 4 million ha of cropland fallowed in this region every year represent both a challenge to sustainability and an opportunity to address that challenge. Long identified as unsustainable when accomplished by tillage and without fertilizer input, the summerfallow-wheat crop production system is also energy-efficient by definitions that do not account for changes in soil fertility. It is shown here that accounting for lost soil N as an energy input to crop production partially resolves this paradox, but no strategy for energetic valuation of systems that build soil quality is apparent. Alternatives to summerfallow considered here include pulse crops (e.g. pea and lentil) grown for grain, forage, or as cover crops. In research conducted on farms already growing pulses, the largest effect on cropping system energy productivity was due to increased wheat yield rather than a reduction of inputs. In plot-scale research addressing a wider variety of production practices, neither system-level energy intensity nor productivity provided more insight into energy price exposure than basic economic analyses. 'Co-authored by Perry R. Miller and Clain A. Jones.'
author Burgess, Macdonald Hugh
spellingShingle Burgess, Macdonald Hugh
Sustainable cropping systems for the Northern Great Plains: energetic and economic considerations
author_facet Burgess, Macdonald Hugh
author_sort Burgess, Macdonald Hugh
title Sustainable cropping systems for the Northern Great Plains: energetic and economic considerations
title_short Sustainable cropping systems for the Northern Great Plains: energetic and economic considerations
title_full Sustainable cropping systems for the Northern Great Plains: energetic and economic considerations
title_fullStr Sustainable cropping systems for the Northern Great Plains: energetic and economic considerations
title_full_unstemmed Sustainable cropping systems for the Northern Great Plains: energetic and economic considerations
title_sort sustainable cropping systems for the northern great plains: energetic and economic considerations
publishDate 2012
url http://etd.lib.montana.edu/etd/2012/burgess/BurgessMH0512.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT burgessmacdonaldhugh sustainablecroppingsystemsforthenortherngreatplainsenergeticandeconomicconsiderations
_version_ 1716392305585291264