Archaeology Database Management: A Case Study in the Solution of Incompatibility Issues between Different Archaeological Databases.

Archaeologists tend to use computerized databases to record data recovered from excavations. These databases contain large collections of information that can aid archaeologists in making educated decisions, interpretations, and test hypotheses from the recovered data. As time passed, databases beca...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Scherr, Nathaniel
Other Authors: Dr. Douglas H. MacDonald
Format: Others
Language:en
Published: The University of Montana 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:http://etd.lib.umt.edu/theses/available/etd-12172012-144513/
id ndltd-MONTANA-oai-etd.lib.umt.edu-etd-12172012-144513
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-MONTANA-oai-etd.lib.umt.edu-etd-12172012-1445132013-02-05T03:29:27Z Archaeology Database Management: A Case Study in the Solution of Incompatibility Issues between Different Archaeological Databases. Scherr, Nathaniel Anthropology Archaeologists tend to use computerized databases to record data recovered from excavations. These databases contain large collections of information that can aid archaeologists in making educated decisions, interpretations, and test hypotheses from the recovered data. As time passed, databases became bigger and varied in the information that can be stored. As a result, more data could be recorded from the field that in turn can be used to ask more complicated questions of archaeological remains. However, the use of computerized archaeological databases does not come without its own problems. For example, since each archaeological project can be governed by different goals the information is often collected and classified by using different methods. This can create problems with compatibility within the data set and the database program. This problem is faced by many archaeologists, which limits academic collaboration and use of recovered data from archaeological sites. The understanding of the problems will help to create the solution. The following will explore how the problem of data compatibility was solved between the University Montana's archaeological database and the National Park Service's Heritage Center Database. This study presents a three-phase process that allows the data to be converted from Microsoft Access to Excel, and from Excel to the National Park Service's database program. The goal of this project was to decrease the amount of time needed for the conversion of data, to automate the process as much as possible, and to explain in easy-to-follow step-by-step process of conversion process. This project also led to the creation of a computer program to simplify the conversion process. This program will be useful to any archaeologists working within any Department of the Interior agency. Dr. Douglas H. MacDonald The University of Montana 2013-02-04 text application/pdf http://etd.lib.umt.edu/theses/available/etd-12172012-144513/ http://etd.lib.umt.edu/theses/available/etd-12172012-144513/ en unrestricted I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to University of Montana or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report.
collection NDLTD
language en
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Anthropology
spellingShingle Anthropology
Scherr, Nathaniel
Archaeology Database Management: A Case Study in the Solution of Incompatibility Issues between Different Archaeological Databases.
description Archaeologists tend to use computerized databases to record data recovered from excavations. These databases contain large collections of information that can aid archaeologists in making educated decisions, interpretations, and test hypotheses from the recovered data. As time passed, databases became bigger and varied in the information that can be stored. As a result, more data could be recorded from the field that in turn can be used to ask more complicated questions of archaeological remains. However, the use of computerized archaeological databases does not come without its own problems. For example, since each archaeological project can be governed by different goals the information is often collected and classified by using different methods. This can create problems with compatibility within the data set and the database program. This problem is faced by many archaeologists, which limits academic collaboration and use of recovered data from archaeological sites. The understanding of the problems will help to create the solution. The following will explore how the problem of data compatibility was solved between the University Montana's archaeological database and the National Park Service's Heritage Center Database. This study presents a three-phase process that allows the data to be converted from Microsoft Access to Excel, and from Excel to the National Park Service's database program. The goal of this project was to decrease the amount of time needed for the conversion of data, to automate the process as much as possible, and to explain in easy-to-follow step-by-step process of conversion process. This project also led to the creation of a computer program to simplify the conversion process. This program will be useful to any archaeologists working within any Department of the Interior agency.
author2 Dr. Douglas H. MacDonald
author_facet Dr. Douglas H. MacDonald
Scherr, Nathaniel
author Scherr, Nathaniel
author_sort Scherr, Nathaniel
title Archaeology Database Management: A Case Study in the Solution of Incompatibility Issues between Different Archaeological Databases.
title_short Archaeology Database Management: A Case Study in the Solution of Incompatibility Issues between Different Archaeological Databases.
title_full Archaeology Database Management: A Case Study in the Solution of Incompatibility Issues between Different Archaeological Databases.
title_fullStr Archaeology Database Management: A Case Study in the Solution of Incompatibility Issues between Different Archaeological Databases.
title_full_unstemmed Archaeology Database Management: A Case Study in the Solution of Incompatibility Issues between Different Archaeological Databases.
title_sort archaeology database management: a case study in the solution of incompatibility issues between different archaeological databases.
publisher The University of Montana
publishDate 2013
url http://etd.lib.umt.edu/theses/available/etd-12172012-144513/
work_keys_str_mv AT scherrnathaniel archaeologydatabasemanagementacasestudyinthesolutionofincompatibilityissuesbetweendifferentarchaeologicaldatabases
_version_ 1716576144909664256