Gender differences in self-assessments at the application interface

Thesis: S.M. in Management Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sloan School of Management, September 2013. === "September 2013." Some pages printed in landscape orientation. Cataloged from PDF version of thesis. === Includes bibliographical references (pages 30-33). === Past s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Campero Molina, Santiago
Other Authors: Roberto M. Fernandez
Format: Others
Language:English
Published: Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/86262
id ndltd-MIT-oai-dspace.mit.edu-1721.1-86262
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-MIT-oai-dspace.mit.edu-1721.1-862622019-05-02T16:22:18Z Gender differences in self-assessments at the application interface Campero Molina, Santiago Roberto M. Fernandez Sloan School of Management. Sloan School of Management. Sloan School of Management. Thesis: S.M. in Management Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sloan School of Management, September 2013. "September 2013." Some pages printed in landscape orientation. Cataloged from PDF version of thesis. Includes bibliographical references (pages 30-33). Past studies have shown that supply side sorting processes at the job application interface contribute to both vertical and horizontal gender job segregation. A prominent set of theories focused on the supply side stress the role of biased self-assessments in inducing gendered career choices (Correll 2001, 2004). In essence, females are posited to be less likely to pursue positions in male-dominated fields because they have downwardly biased views of their competence in those fields due to male-favoring cultural associations of competence. I examine the presence of biased self-assessments in the case of labor market job applicants. Female applicants in my sample generally self-assess their career level lower than males with the same level of education and experience. Consistent with Correll (2001, 2004), there are also differences in the extent of this bias with respect to the gender type of the job pursued. Female applicants report significantly lower self-assessments than comparable males when pursuing jobs in male typed departments but not when pursuing jobs in gender neutral departments. Across the organizational hierarchy, the extent of self-assessment bias favoring males increases as you move up levels of the hierarchy. However, I find no gender self-assessment bias among applicants to departments with female competence associations. This suggests the limits of Correll's "cultural beliefs" explanation of biased self-assessments beyond the case of stereotypically male fields. by Santiago Campero Molina. S.M. in Management Research 2014-04-25T15:47:27Z 2014-04-25T15:47:27Z 2013 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/86262 874130784 eng M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission. http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582 43 pages application/pdf Massachusetts Institute of Technology
collection NDLTD
language English
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Sloan School of Management.
spellingShingle Sloan School of Management.
Campero Molina, Santiago
Gender differences in self-assessments at the application interface
description Thesis: S.M. in Management Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sloan School of Management, September 2013. === "September 2013." Some pages printed in landscape orientation. Cataloged from PDF version of thesis. === Includes bibliographical references (pages 30-33). === Past studies have shown that supply side sorting processes at the job application interface contribute to both vertical and horizontal gender job segregation. A prominent set of theories focused on the supply side stress the role of biased self-assessments in inducing gendered career choices (Correll 2001, 2004). In essence, females are posited to be less likely to pursue positions in male-dominated fields because they have downwardly biased views of their competence in those fields due to male-favoring cultural associations of competence. I examine the presence of biased self-assessments in the case of labor market job applicants. Female applicants in my sample generally self-assess their career level lower than males with the same level of education and experience. Consistent with Correll (2001, 2004), there are also differences in the extent of this bias with respect to the gender type of the job pursued. Female applicants report significantly lower self-assessments than comparable males when pursuing jobs in male typed departments but not when pursuing jobs in gender neutral departments. Across the organizational hierarchy, the extent of self-assessment bias favoring males increases as you move up levels of the hierarchy. However, I find no gender self-assessment bias among applicants to departments with female competence associations. This suggests the limits of Correll's "cultural beliefs" explanation of biased self-assessments beyond the case of stereotypically male fields. === by Santiago Campero Molina. === S.M. in Management Research
author2 Roberto M. Fernandez
author_facet Roberto M. Fernandez
Campero Molina, Santiago
author Campero Molina, Santiago
author_sort Campero Molina, Santiago
title Gender differences in self-assessments at the application interface
title_short Gender differences in self-assessments at the application interface
title_full Gender differences in self-assessments at the application interface
title_fullStr Gender differences in self-assessments at the application interface
title_full_unstemmed Gender differences in self-assessments at the application interface
title_sort gender differences in self-assessments at the application interface
publisher Massachusetts Institute of Technology
publishDate 2014
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/86262
work_keys_str_mv AT camperomolinasantiago genderdifferencesinselfassessmentsattheapplicationinterface
_version_ 1719039600637247488