Catalysts of conflict : how refugee crises lead to the spread of civil war

Thesis (Ph. D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Political Science, 2002. === Includes bibliographical references (p. 328-364). === The spread of civil war due to refugee crises has occurred repeatedly throughout history. In some refugee crises, the sending state pursues the refugees...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lischer, Sarah Kenyon
Other Authors: Stephen Van Evera.
Format: Others
Language:English
Published: Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2005
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/8175
id ndltd-MIT-oai-dspace.mit.edu-1721.1-8175
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-MIT-oai-dspace.mit.edu-1721.1-81752019-05-02T15:50:01Z Catalysts of conflict : how refugee crises lead to the spread of civil war Lischer, Sarah Kenyon Stephen Van Evera. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Political Science. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Political Science. Political Science. Thesis (Ph. D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Political Science, 2002. Includes bibliographical references (p. 328-364). The spread of civil war due to refugee crises has occurred repeatedly throughout history. In some refugee crises, the sending state pursues the refugees, subjecting them to military attack. In other cases, militant exiles use the refugee camps as rear bases in their attacks on the sending state. As the cross-border attacks escalate, the risk of international war grows. The refugee crisis spawned by the 1994 genocide in Rwanda provides the most extreme example of this phenomenon. The militant actions of the Rwandan Hutu refugees in Zaire eventually sparked two international wars that led to further massive population displacement in the region. The recurring pattern of violent refugee crises, prompts the following three questions: 1) How widespread is the phenomenon of political violence involving refugees? 2) Under what conditions do refugee crises cause a civil war to spread across borders? 3) What role can international actors, such as the United Nations or the United States government, play in preventing the spread of violence? To answer the above questions, this dissertation presents new time series data on refugee-related political violence and also systematically compares violent and non-violent crises involving Rwandan, Bosnian, and Afghan refugees. This dissertation advances a political explanation for the spread of civil war in refugee crises and tests it against the prevailing socioeconomic explanation. According to the political explanation, three factors combine to cause the spread of civil war. 1) Strong political cohesion among the group before exile determines initial refugee militancy. (cont.) 2) A refugee hosting state that lacks the capability and/or willingness to secure borders and demilitarize refugees facilitates the spread of war. 3) Third party states and non-state actors that intentionally or inadvertently contribute resources to combatants expand the conflict. The humanitarian assistance literature and the policy community routinely offer socioeconomic explanations that ignore the political context of the crisis. According to those explanations, camps near the border, large populations in camps, the presence of bored young men, and poor living conditions cause cross-border violence. This dissertation finds that none of those four socioeconomic propositions satisfactorily explain the spread of civil war. by Sarah Kenyon Lischer. Ph.D. 2005-08-24T20:58:59Z 2005-08-24T20:58:59Z 2002 2002 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/8175 51933855 eng M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission. http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582 364 p. 30450345 bytes 30450103 bytes application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf Massachusetts Institute of Technology
collection NDLTD
language English
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Political Science.
spellingShingle Political Science.
Lischer, Sarah Kenyon
Catalysts of conflict : how refugee crises lead to the spread of civil war
description Thesis (Ph. D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Political Science, 2002. === Includes bibliographical references (p. 328-364). === The spread of civil war due to refugee crises has occurred repeatedly throughout history. In some refugee crises, the sending state pursues the refugees, subjecting them to military attack. In other cases, militant exiles use the refugee camps as rear bases in their attacks on the sending state. As the cross-border attacks escalate, the risk of international war grows. The refugee crisis spawned by the 1994 genocide in Rwanda provides the most extreme example of this phenomenon. The militant actions of the Rwandan Hutu refugees in Zaire eventually sparked two international wars that led to further massive population displacement in the region. The recurring pattern of violent refugee crises, prompts the following three questions: 1) How widespread is the phenomenon of political violence involving refugees? 2) Under what conditions do refugee crises cause a civil war to spread across borders? 3) What role can international actors, such as the United Nations or the United States government, play in preventing the spread of violence? To answer the above questions, this dissertation presents new time series data on refugee-related political violence and also systematically compares violent and non-violent crises involving Rwandan, Bosnian, and Afghan refugees. This dissertation advances a political explanation for the spread of civil war in refugee crises and tests it against the prevailing socioeconomic explanation. According to the political explanation, three factors combine to cause the spread of civil war. 1) Strong political cohesion among the group before exile determines initial refugee militancy. === (cont.) 2) A refugee hosting state that lacks the capability and/or willingness to secure borders and demilitarize refugees facilitates the spread of war. 3) Third party states and non-state actors that intentionally or inadvertently contribute resources to combatants expand the conflict. The humanitarian assistance literature and the policy community routinely offer socioeconomic explanations that ignore the political context of the crisis. According to those explanations, camps near the border, large populations in camps, the presence of bored young men, and poor living conditions cause cross-border violence. This dissertation finds that none of those four socioeconomic propositions satisfactorily explain the spread of civil war. === by Sarah Kenyon Lischer. === Ph.D.
author2 Stephen Van Evera.
author_facet Stephen Van Evera.
Lischer, Sarah Kenyon
author Lischer, Sarah Kenyon
author_sort Lischer, Sarah Kenyon
title Catalysts of conflict : how refugee crises lead to the spread of civil war
title_short Catalysts of conflict : how refugee crises lead to the spread of civil war
title_full Catalysts of conflict : how refugee crises lead to the spread of civil war
title_fullStr Catalysts of conflict : how refugee crises lead to the spread of civil war
title_full_unstemmed Catalysts of conflict : how refugee crises lead to the spread of civil war
title_sort catalysts of conflict : how refugee crises lead to the spread of civil war
publisher Massachusetts Institute of Technology
publishDate 2005
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/8175
work_keys_str_mv AT lischersarahkenyon catalystsofconflicthowrefugeecrisesleadtothespreadofcivilwar
_version_ 1719029691951611904