Rationality without representation

Thesis (Ph. D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Linguistics and Philosophy, 2011. === Cataloged from PDF version of thesis. === Includes bibliographical references (p. 103-109). === This dissertation is about whether and how non-representational attitudes could play a role in our th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Pérez Carballo, Alejandro
Other Authors: Robert C. Stalnaker and Stephen Yablo.
Format: Others
Language:English
Published: Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/68519
id ndltd-MIT-oai-dspace.mit.edu-1721.1-68519
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-MIT-oai-dspace.mit.edu-1721.1-685192019-05-02T15:33:27Z Rationality without representation Pérez Carballo, Alejandro Robert C. Stalnaker and Stephen Yablo. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Linguistics and Philosophy. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Linguistics and Philosophy. Linguistics and Philosophy. Thesis (Ph. D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Linguistics and Philosophy, 2011. Cataloged from PDF version of thesis. Includes bibliographical references (p. 103-109). This dissertation is about whether and how non-representational attitudes could play a role in our theories of rationality. In Chapter 1 ('Negation, expressivism, and intentionality') I argue that the best explanation for why two mental states are inconsistent need not presuppose that such states are representational-that they have, in the jargon, truth-conditions. I use this to provide a solution to the 'negation problem' for metaethical expressivism. In Chapter 2 ('Structuring logical space') I sketch an account of mathematical practice along non-representational lines. I show how it can do justice to the applicability of mathematics, and propose ways in which one's epistemic goals can impose substantial constraints on which mathematical theories to accept. Chapter 3 ('Good questions') provides a general account of the way in which rationality constrains changes in our hypothesis space. In particular, I show how some such changes can be better than others by placing the discussion within a general framework of rational dynamics, on which rational epistemic change involves maximizing expected epistemic utility. by Alejandro Perez Carballo. Ph.D. 2012-01-12T19:34:15Z 2012-01-12T19:34:15Z 2011 2011 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/68519 770749232 eng M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission. http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582 109 p. application/pdf Massachusetts Institute of Technology
collection NDLTD
language English
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Linguistics and Philosophy.
spellingShingle Linguistics and Philosophy.
Pérez Carballo, Alejandro
Rationality without representation
description Thesis (Ph. D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Linguistics and Philosophy, 2011. === Cataloged from PDF version of thesis. === Includes bibliographical references (p. 103-109). === This dissertation is about whether and how non-representational attitudes could play a role in our theories of rationality. In Chapter 1 ('Negation, expressivism, and intentionality') I argue that the best explanation for why two mental states are inconsistent need not presuppose that such states are representational-that they have, in the jargon, truth-conditions. I use this to provide a solution to the 'negation problem' for metaethical expressivism. In Chapter 2 ('Structuring logical space') I sketch an account of mathematical practice along non-representational lines. I show how it can do justice to the applicability of mathematics, and propose ways in which one's epistemic goals can impose substantial constraints on which mathematical theories to accept. Chapter 3 ('Good questions') provides a general account of the way in which rationality constrains changes in our hypothesis space. In particular, I show how some such changes can be better than others by placing the discussion within a general framework of rational dynamics, on which rational epistemic change involves maximizing expected epistemic utility. === by Alejandro Perez Carballo. === Ph.D.
author2 Robert C. Stalnaker and Stephen Yablo.
author_facet Robert C. Stalnaker and Stephen Yablo.
Pérez Carballo, Alejandro
author Pérez Carballo, Alejandro
author_sort Pérez Carballo, Alejandro
title Rationality without representation
title_short Rationality without representation
title_full Rationality without representation
title_fullStr Rationality without representation
title_full_unstemmed Rationality without representation
title_sort rationality without representation
publisher Massachusetts Institute of Technology
publishDate 2012
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/68519
work_keys_str_mv AT perezcarballoalejandro rationalitywithoutrepresentation
_version_ 1719023763743309824