Helmet-mounted display symbology for ground collision avoidance in fighter aircraft

Thesis (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 1998. === Includes bibliographical references (p. 81-82). === A two-part experimental simulation study was performed to examine ways of improving Ground Collision Avoidance Systems (GCAS) for fighter aircraf...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Taylor, Jonathan B. (Jonathan Brett), 1974-
Other Authors: James Kuchar.
Format: Others
Language:English
Published: Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/47670
id ndltd-MIT-oai-dspace.mit.edu-1721.1-47670
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-MIT-oai-dspace.mit.edu-1721.1-476702020-08-04T05:07:18Z Helmet-mounted display symbology for ground collision avoidance in fighter aircraft Taylor, Jonathan B. (Jonathan Brett), 1974- James Kuchar. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics Aeronautics and Astronautics Thesis (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 1998. Includes bibliographical references (p. 81-82). A two-part experimental simulation study was performed to examine ways of improving Ground Collision Avoidance Systems (GCAS) for fighter aircraft through the use of Helmet-Mounted Display (HMD) symbology. Modality and information presentation issues were addressed through the design and testing of five display formats. An audio alert with no visual symbology was used as a baseline. The addition of visual alert symbology was tested using a head-fixed iconic alerting cue. Formats for additional recovery information were tested using an aircraft-fixed guidance cue, a head-fixed guidance cue, and a head-fixed guidance cue with a pitch ladder. Subjects were given audio and visual side tasks and then responded to GCAS alerts. Recovery performance and subjective ratings of the displays were recorded. Lower reaction times were observed when a head-fixed visual alert was given in addition to the standard audio alert. No significant differences were seen in subject recovery performance, measured by altitude loss and response times. However, subject head motion varied significantly with display type. Subjects tended to fixate on guidance and state symbology when it was provided. This led to cases where pilots performed entire recoveries with their heads offboresight when using head-fixed guidance symbology. Subjects varied in their preference of symbology, but head-fixed guidance and state information was preferred over the other display categories using the Analytical Hierarchy Process. by 1Lt Jonathan B. Taylor, USAF. S.M. 2009-10-01T15:30:56Z 2009-10-01T15:30:56Z 1998 1998 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/47670 42241735 eng M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission. http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582 126 p. application/pdf Massachusetts Institute of Technology
collection NDLTD
language English
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Aeronautics and Astronautics
spellingShingle Aeronautics and Astronautics
Taylor, Jonathan B. (Jonathan Brett), 1974-
Helmet-mounted display symbology for ground collision avoidance in fighter aircraft
description Thesis (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 1998. === Includes bibliographical references (p. 81-82). === A two-part experimental simulation study was performed to examine ways of improving Ground Collision Avoidance Systems (GCAS) for fighter aircraft through the use of Helmet-Mounted Display (HMD) symbology. Modality and information presentation issues were addressed through the design and testing of five display formats. An audio alert with no visual symbology was used as a baseline. The addition of visual alert symbology was tested using a head-fixed iconic alerting cue. Formats for additional recovery information were tested using an aircraft-fixed guidance cue, a head-fixed guidance cue, and a head-fixed guidance cue with a pitch ladder. Subjects were given audio and visual side tasks and then responded to GCAS alerts. Recovery performance and subjective ratings of the displays were recorded. Lower reaction times were observed when a head-fixed visual alert was given in addition to the standard audio alert. No significant differences were seen in subject recovery performance, measured by altitude loss and response times. However, subject head motion varied significantly with display type. Subjects tended to fixate on guidance and state symbology when it was provided. This led to cases where pilots performed entire recoveries with their heads offboresight when using head-fixed guidance symbology. Subjects varied in their preference of symbology, but head-fixed guidance and state information was preferred over the other display categories using the Analytical Hierarchy Process. === by 1Lt Jonathan B. Taylor, USAF. === S.M.
author2 James Kuchar.
author_facet James Kuchar.
Taylor, Jonathan B. (Jonathan Brett), 1974-
author Taylor, Jonathan B. (Jonathan Brett), 1974-
author_sort Taylor, Jonathan B. (Jonathan Brett), 1974-
title Helmet-mounted display symbology for ground collision avoidance in fighter aircraft
title_short Helmet-mounted display symbology for ground collision avoidance in fighter aircraft
title_full Helmet-mounted display symbology for ground collision avoidance in fighter aircraft
title_fullStr Helmet-mounted display symbology for ground collision avoidance in fighter aircraft
title_full_unstemmed Helmet-mounted display symbology for ground collision avoidance in fighter aircraft
title_sort helmet-mounted display symbology for ground collision avoidance in fighter aircraft
publisher Massachusetts Institute of Technology
publishDate 2009
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/47670
work_keys_str_mv AT taylorjonathanbjonathanbrett1974 helmetmounteddisplaysymbologyforgroundcollisionavoidanceinfighteraircraft
_version_ 1719336599046586368