CO₂ compression for capture-enabled power systems

Thesis (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Chemical Engineering, 2009. === Includes bibliographical references (leaves 182-185). === The objective of this thesis is to evaluate a new carbon dioxide compression technology - shock compression - applied specifically to capture-enabl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Suri, Rajat
Other Authors: Gregory J. McRae.
Format: Others
Language:English
Published: Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/46616
id ndltd-MIT-oai-dspace.mit.edu-1721.1-46616
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-MIT-oai-dspace.mit.edu-1721.1-466162019-05-02T15:52:42Z CO₂ compression for capture-enabled power systems Carbon dioxide compression for capture-enabled power systems Suri, Rajat Gregory J. McRae. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Chemical Engineering. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Chemical Engineering. Chemical Engineering. Thesis (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Chemical Engineering, 2009. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 182-185). The objective of this thesis is to evaluate a new carbon dioxide compression technology - shock compression - applied specifically to capture-enabled power plants. Global warming has increased public interest in carbon capture and sequestration technologies (CCS), but these technologies add significant capital and operating cost at present, which creates a significant barrier to adoption. Carbon dioxide compression technology makes up a high proportion of the additional cost required, making it a focal point for engineering efforts to improve the economic feasibility of carbon capture. To this effect, shock compressors have the potential to reduce both operating and capital costs with supporting compression ratios of up to 10:1, requiring less stages and theoretically allowing for the possibility of heat integration with the rest of the plant, allowing waste heat to be recovered from hot interstage compressed carbon dioxide. This thesis first presents a technical context for carbon dioxide compression by providing an overview of capture technologies to build an understanding of the different options being investigated for efficient removal of carbon dioxide from power plant emissions. It then examines conventional compression technologies, and how they have each evolved over time. Sample engineering calculations are performed to model gas streams processed by these conventional compressors. An analysis of shock compression is carried out by first building a background in compressible flow theory, and then using this as a foundation for understanding shock wave theory, especially oblique shocks. The shock compressor design is carefully analyzed using patent information, and a simulation of the physics of the shock compressor is created using equations from the theory section described earlier. (cont.) A heat integration analysis is carried out to compare how conventional compressor technologies compare against the new shock compressor in terms of cooling duty and power recovery when integrated with the carbon dioxide capture unit. Both precombustion IGCC using Selexol and post-combustion MEA configurations are considered and compared. Finally an economic analysis is conducted to determine whether shock compression technology should be attractive to investors and plant managers deciding to support it. Key factors such as market, macroeconomic and technical risk are analyzed for investors, whereas a comparison of capital and operating cost is carried out for plant managers. Relevant risks associated with new compression technologies are also analyzed. It is found that there is no significant operating cost benefit to the shock compressor over the conventional compressor, both costing $3,700/hr for an IGCC plant. Power recovery is simply too low to justify the high power requirements in operating a shock compressor with a 10:1 ratio. The technical claims of the shock compressor (such as projected discharge temperature and pressures) seem reasonable after basic modeling, which shows a higher temperature and pressure than claimed by Ramgen. by Rajat Suri. S.M. 2009-08-26T17:04:17Z 2009-08-26T17:04:17Z 2009 2009 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/46616 426039923 eng M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission. http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582 185 leaves application/pdf Massachusetts Institute of Technology
collection NDLTD
language English
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Chemical Engineering.
spellingShingle Chemical Engineering.
Suri, Rajat
CO₂ compression for capture-enabled power systems
description Thesis (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Chemical Engineering, 2009. === Includes bibliographical references (leaves 182-185). === The objective of this thesis is to evaluate a new carbon dioxide compression technology - shock compression - applied specifically to capture-enabled power plants. Global warming has increased public interest in carbon capture and sequestration technologies (CCS), but these technologies add significant capital and operating cost at present, which creates a significant barrier to adoption. Carbon dioxide compression technology makes up a high proportion of the additional cost required, making it a focal point for engineering efforts to improve the economic feasibility of carbon capture. To this effect, shock compressors have the potential to reduce both operating and capital costs with supporting compression ratios of up to 10:1, requiring less stages and theoretically allowing for the possibility of heat integration with the rest of the plant, allowing waste heat to be recovered from hot interstage compressed carbon dioxide. This thesis first presents a technical context for carbon dioxide compression by providing an overview of capture technologies to build an understanding of the different options being investigated for efficient removal of carbon dioxide from power plant emissions. It then examines conventional compression technologies, and how they have each evolved over time. Sample engineering calculations are performed to model gas streams processed by these conventional compressors. An analysis of shock compression is carried out by first building a background in compressible flow theory, and then using this as a foundation for understanding shock wave theory, especially oblique shocks. The shock compressor design is carefully analyzed using patent information, and a simulation of the physics of the shock compressor is created using equations from the theory section described earlier. === (cont.) A heat integration analysis is carried out to compare how conventional compressor technologies compare against the new shock compressor in terms of cooling duty and power recovery when integrated with the carbon dioxide capture unit. Both precombustion IGCC using Selexol and post-combustion MEA configurations are considered and compared. Finally an economic analysis is conducted to determine whether shock compression technology should be attractive to investors and plant managers deciding to support it. Key factors such as market, macroeconomic and technical risk are analyzed for investors, whereas a comparison of capital and operating cost is carried out for plant managers. Relevant risks associated with new compression technologies are also analyzed. It is found that there is no significant operating cost benefit to the shock compressor over the conventional compressor, both costing $3,700/hr for an IGCC plant. Power recovery is simply too low to justify the high power requirements in operating a shock compressor with a 10:1 ratio. The technical claims of the shock compressor (such as projected discharge temperature and pressures) seem reasonable after basic modeling, which shows a higher temperature and pressure than claimed by Ramgen. === by Rajat Suri. === S.M.
author2 Gregory J. McRae.
author_facet Gregory J. McRae.
Suri, Rajat
author Suri, Rajat
author_sort Suri, Rajat
title CO₂ compression for capture-enabled power systems
title_short CO₂ compression for capture-enabled power systems
title_full CO₂ compression for capture-enabled power systems
title_fullStr CO₂ compression for capture-enabled power systems
title_full_unstemmed CO₂ compression for capture-enabled power systems
title_sort co₂ compression for capture-enabled power systems
publisher Massachusetts Institute of Technology
publishDate 2009
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/46616
work_keys_str_mv AT surirajat co2compressionforcaptureenabledpowersystems
AT surirajat carbondioxidecompressionforcaptureenabledpowersystems
_version_ 1719030126943928320