Through mimesis and methodology

Thesis (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Architecture, 2008. === Leaf 58 blank. === Includes bibliographical references (leaves 54-55). === The goal of this document is to outline the trajectory in which I have been working the past several years. I would like to comment and de...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Pedroza, Edgar
Other Authors: Krzysztof Wodiczko.
Format: Others
Language:English
Published: Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/44284
id ndltd-MIT-oai-dspace.mit.edu-1721.1-44284
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-MIT-oai-dspace.mit.edu-1721.1-442842019-05-23T03:12:16Z Through mimesis and methodology Pedroza, Edgar Krzysztof Wodiczko. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Architecture. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Architecture. Architecture. Thesis (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Architecture, 2008. Leaf 58 blank. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 54-55). The goal of this document is to outline the trajectory in which I have been working the past several years. I would like to comment and detail the production of several projects, including Site Nine: Indefensible Structures, Text 11: Site Translations, Study For Casablanca: Maps For Access And Improvised Housing, and Lavon, Texas - Levittown, New York. The reach of the projects, and it is perpetually adaptive to new concerns, is not to assign a space between art, architecture, and planning. Even though there is certainly space which the works will invoke between these areas. This document and the projects would question why there should be such a space and what it could achieve. It may be possible to see at such a point that assigning nomenclature can be considered a quick task and the value is the content of a word, not by the name by which it is called. This is not to say meaning and context cannot be derived from the title of disciplines or fields, they in fact provide considerable insight. The aforementioned projects, and those to follow, would look into the social climates of a location and only after considerations of the political, economic, and communicative indicators, courses of intervention would be developed. I would like to note, ever more in the continuation of these works, the implementation of intervention becomes less so. The projects, in chronology, quietly move from methods of production to methods of research. This was due to an increasing appeal to the cultural sensitivity of any and all methods of production, in both domestic and foreign capacities. by Edgar Pedroza. S.M. 2009-01-30T16:28:03Z 2009-01-30T16:28:03Z 2008 2008 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/44284 269366414 eng M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission. http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582 58 leaves application/pdf Massachusetts Institute of Technology
collection NDLTD
language English
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Architecture.
spellingShingle Architecture.
Pedroza, Edgar
Through mimesis and methodology
description Thesis (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Architecture, 2008. === Leaf 58 blank. === Includes bibliographical references (leaves 54-55). === The goal of this document is to outline the trajectory in which I have been working the past several years. I would like to comment and detail the production of several projects, including Site Nine: Indefensible Structures, Text 11: Site Translations, Study For Casablanca: Maps For Access And Improvised Housing, and Lavon, Texas - Levittown, New York. The reach of the projects, and it is perpetually adaptive to new concerns, is not to assign a space between art, architecture, and planning. Even though there is certainly space which the works will invoke between these areas. This document and the projects would question why there should be such a space and what it could achieve. It may be possible to see at such a point that assigning nomenclature can be considered a quick task and the value is the content of a word, not by the name by which it is called. This is not to say meaning and context cannot be derived from the title of disciplines or fields, they in fact provide considerable insight. The aforementioned projects, and those to follow, would look into the social climates of a location and only after considerations of the political, economic, and communicative indicators, courses of intervention would be developed. I would like to note, ever more in the continuation of these works, the implementation of intervention becomes less so. The projects, in chronology, quietly move from methods of production to methods of research. This was due to an increasing appeal to the cultural sensitivity of any and all methods of production, in both domestic and foreign capacities. === by Edgar Pedroza. === S.M.
author2 Krzysztof Wodiczko.
author_facet Krzysztof Wodiczko.
Pedroza, Edgar
author Pedroza, Edgar
author_sort Pedroza, Edgar
title Through mimesis and methodology
title_short Through mimesis and methodology
title_full Through mimesis and methodology
title_fullStr Through mimesis and methodology
title_full_unstemmed Through mimesis and methodology
title_sort through mimesis and methodology
publisher Massachusetts Institute of Technology
publishDate 2009
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/44284
work_keys_str_mv AT pedrozaedgar throughmimesisandmethodology
_version_ 1719191854993375232