There's no justice in transit! : transit equity, land use, and air quality in Boston
Thesis (M.C.P.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Urban Studies and Planning, 2007. === Includes bibliographical references (p. 103-111). === As a result of air pollution created by the Central Artery/Tunnel Project (CA/T), aka "the Big Dig," transit and other air quality mi...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
2008
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/39942 |
id |
ndltd-MIT-oai-dspace.mit.edu-1721.1-39942 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-MIT-oai-dspace.mit.edu-1721.1-399422019-05-02T16:38:20Z There's no justice in transit! : transit equity, land use, and air quality in Boston There is no justice in transit! : transit equity, land use, and air quality in Boston Machala, Laura Beth James Hamilton. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Urban Studies and Planning. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Urban Studies and Planning. Urban Studies and Planning. Thesis (M.C.P.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Urban Studies and Planning, 2007. Includes bibliographical references (p. 103-111). As a result of air pollution created by the Central Artery/Tunnel Project (CA/T), aka "the Big Dig," transit and other air quality mitigation projects were incorporated into the State Implementation Plan (SIP). The SIP is mandated by the Clean Air Act (CAA) for areas that do not attain or need to maintain air quality above federally mandated levels. Originally, the transit commitments that were made to mitigate the effects of the Big Dig were located :in urban and suburban areas. However, while an urban/suburban balance was arguably intended in the SIP, over the years, the urban SIP commitments have been largely neglected. As a result, transit justice in Greater Boston has been negatively effected. If the SIP is truly meant to improve air quality, its focus should be on making cities more viable and healthy places to live and on curtailing sprawling suburban land use. Furthermore, SIP requirements should change to influence a more equitable distribution of transit investment in Boston and other metropolitan areas. by Laura Beth Machala. M.C.P. 2008-01-10T16:05:10Z 2008-01-10T16:05:10Z 2007 2007 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/39942 182858122 eng M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission. http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582 120 p. application/pdf Massachusetts Institute of Technology |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
English |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
Urban Studies and Planning. |
spellingShingle |
Urban Studies and Planning. Machala, Laura Beth There's no justice in transit! : transit equity, land use, and air quality in Boston |
description |
Thesis (M.C.P.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Urban Studies and Planning, 2007. === Includes bibliographical references (p. 103-111). === As a result of air pollution created by the Central Artery/Tunnel Project (CA/T), aka "the Big Dig," transit and other air quality mitigation projects were incorporated into the State Implementation Plan (SIP). The SIP is mandated by the Clean Air Act (CAA) for areas that do not attain or need to maintain air quality above federally mandated levels. Originally, the transit commitments that were made to mitigate the effects of the Big Dig were located :in urban and suburban areas. However, while an urban/suburban balance was arguably intended in the SIP, over the years, the urban SIP commitments have been largely neglected. As a result, transit justice in Greater Boston has been negatively effected. If the SIP is truly meant to improve air quality, its focus should be on making cities more viable and healthy places to live and on curtailing sprawling suburban land use. Furthermore, SIP requirements should change to influence a more equitable distribution of transit investment in Boston and other metropolitan areas. === by Laura Beth Machala. === M.C.P. |
author2 |
James Hamilton. |
author_facet |
James Hamilton. Machala, Laura Beth |
author |
Machala, Laura Beth |
author_sort |
Machala, Laura Beth |
title |
There's no justice in transit! : transit equity, land use, and air quality in Boston |
title_short |
There's no justice in transit! : transit equity, land use, and air quality in Boston |
title_full |
There's no justice in transit! : transit equity, land use, and air quality in Boston |
title_fullStr |
There's no justice in transit! : transit equity, land use, and air quality in Boston |
title_full_unstemmed |
There's no justice in transit! : transit equity, land use, and air quality in Boston |
title_sort |
there's no justice in transit! : transit equity, land use, and air quality in boston |
publisher |
Massachusetts Institute of Technology |
publishDate |
2008 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/39942 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT machalalaurabeth theresnojusticeintransittransitequitylanduseandairqualityinboston AT machalalaurabeth thereisnojusticeintransittransitequitylanduseandairqualityinboston |
_version_ |
1719044327425966080 |