Solidere : the battle for Beirut's Central District

Thesis (M.C.P.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Urban Studies and Planning, 2004. === Includes bibliographical references (p. 141-148). === The Beirut Central District was destroyed during the Lebanese Civil War which extended from 1975 to 1990. Unable to reconstruct the center itse...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mango, Tamam, 1981-
Other Authors: Robert M. Fogelson.
Format: Others
Language:English
Published: Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2006
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/30107
id ndltd-MIT-oai-dspace.mit.edu-1721.1-30107
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-MIT-oai-dspace.mit.edu-1721.1-301072019-05-02T16:13:12Z Solidere : the battle for Beirut's Central District Battle for Beirut's Central District Mango, Tamam, 1981- Robert M. Fogelson. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Urban Studies and Planning. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Urban Studies and Planning. Urban Studies and Planning. Thesis (M.C.P.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Urban Studies and Planning, 2004. Includes bibliographical references (p. 141-148). The Beirut Central District was destroyed during the Lebanese Civil War which extended from 1975 to 1990. Unable to reconstruct the center itself, the Lebanese government turned to a private Real Estate Holding Company (REHCO), known by the acronym Solidere, to take over the task of rebuilding. In 1991 Solidere was granted expropriation rights over the Beirut Central District area, a space of approximately 150 hectares. The government's decision to mandate such a large private-to-private transfer was a controversial one that was unprecedented in Lebanese development history. Solidere has been characterized by two very different views. The company's proponents attributed the reconstruction of the city center solely to Solidere. The opposition denounced the firm as an illegal assault on property rights. This thesis traces the company's history. Its survival strategies, in terms of securing government endorsement and gaining public approval, are discussed. Solidere is examined through the lens of secular property rights, evaluating the firm in terms of the two conditions of contribution to the "public benefit," and the compensation provided to the original property owners. Solidere's case is also explored in the context of Islamic property rights, focusing on the concept of waqf. The thesis concludes by abstracting from Solidere to the broader concept of a REHCO, and begins to ask the necessary questions to develop a framework for the successful implementation of this development model. by Tamam Mango. M.C.P. 2006-03-24T18:20:07Z 2006-03-24T18:20:07Z 2004 2004 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/30107 55694744 eng M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission. http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582 148 p. 9869882 bytes 9869689 bytes application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf a-le--- Massachusetts Institute of Technology
collection NDLTD
language English
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Urban Studies and Planning.
spellingShingle Urban Studies and Planning.
Mango, Tamam, 1981-
Solidere : the battle for Beirut's Central District
description Thesis (M.C.P.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Urban Studies and Planning, 2004. === Includes bibliographical references (p. 141-148). === The Beirut Central District was destroyed during the Lebanese Civil War which extended from 1975 to 1990. Unable to reconstruct the center itself, the Lebanese government turned to a private Real Estate Holding Company (REHCO), known by the acronym Solidere, to take over the task of rebuilding. In 1991 Solidere was granted expropriation rights over the Beirut Central District area, a space of approximately 150 hectares. The government's decision to mandate such a large private-to-private transfer was a controversial one that was unprecedented in Lebanese development history. Solidere has been characterized by two very different views. The company's proponents attributed the reconstruction of the city center solely to Solidere. The opposition denounced the firm as an illegal assault on property rights. This thesis traces the company's history. Its survival strategies, in terms of securing government endorsement and gaining public approval, are discussed. Solidere is examined through the lens of secular property rights, evaluating the firm in terms of the two conditions of contribution to the "public benefit," and the compensation provided to the original property owners. Solidere's case is also explored in the context of Islamic property rights, focusing on the concept of waqf. The thesis concludes by abstracting from Solidere to the broader concept of a REHCO, and begins to ask the necessary questions to develop a framework for the successful implementation of this development model. === by Tamam Mango. === M.C.P.
author2 Robert M. Fogelson.
author_facet Robert M. Fogelson.
Mango, Tamam, 1981-
author Mango, Tamam, 1981-
author_sort Mango, Tamam, 1981-
title Solidere : the battle for Beirut's Central District
title_short Solidere : the battle for Beirut's Central District
title_full Solidere : the battle for Beirut's Central District
title_fullStr Solidere : the battle for Beirut's Central District
title_full_unstemmed Solidere : the battle for Beirut's Central District
title_sort solidere : the battle for beirut's central district
publisher Massachusetts Institute of Technology
publishDate 2006
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/30107
work_keys_str_mv AT mangotamam1981 soliderethebattleforbeirutscentraldistrict
AT mangotamam1981 battleforbeirutscentraldistrict
_version_ 1719036298817175552