General method of moments bias and specification tests for quantile regression
Thesis (Ph. D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Economics, 2003. === Includes bibliographical references (leaves 74-75). === Chapter 1: This chapter looks at a dynamic panel data model with fixed effects. Estimating the model with GMM is consistent but suffers from small sample bias...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
2005
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/17628 |
id |
ndltd-MIT-oai-dspace.mit.edu-1721.1-17628 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-MIT-oai-dspace.mit.edu-1721.1-176282019-05-02T16:32:24Z General method of moments bias and specification tests for quantile regression Nejmeldeen, Ziad H. (Ziad Hassan), 1976- Whitney Newey. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Economics. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Economics. Economics. Thesis (Ph. D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Economics, 2003. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 74-75). Chapter 1: This chapter looks at a dynamic panel data model with fixed effects. Estimating the model with GMM is consistent but suffers from small sample bias. We apply Helmert's transformation to the model, assume that error terms and nuisance parameters are homoskedastic and independent across observations and of one another, and utilize the GMM bias calculation of Newey & Smith (2001). This leads to a closed form expression for the GMM bias applied to AR(1) model. Chapter 2: This chapter develops specification tests for quantile regression under various data types. We consider what happens to the quantile regression estimator under local and global misspecification and design specification tests that handle a wide range of data types. We consider how to carry out such tests in practice and present Monte Carlo results to show the effectiveness of such tests. Chapter 3: Through a Taylor expansion, We compute the bias of a general GMM model where the weighting matrix A of the moment conditions g(z, β) is left unspecified, except for some general conditions. Our bias results are compared to those of Newey and West (2003). An important case of GMM estimation with a general weighting matrix A is when A is a function of a vector of parameters with fixed dimension. Arellano's IVE estimator is an example of this type of estimator--we consider the bias properties of Arellano's IVE estimator in the AR(1) setting and compare them to our results from Chapter 1. by Ziad H. Nejmeldeen. Ph.D. 2005-06-02T16:27:48Z 2005-06-02T16:27:48Z 2003 2003 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/17628 54771126 eng M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission. http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582 78 leaves 2134899 bytes 2134706 bytes application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf Massachusetts Institute of Technology |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
English |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
Economics. |
spellingShingle |
Economics. Nejmeldeen, Ziad H. (Ziad Hassan), 1976- General method of moments bias and specification tests for quantile regression |
description |
Thesis (Ph. D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Economics, 2003. === Includes bibliographical references (leaves 74-75). === Chapter 1: This chapter looks at a dynamic panel data model with fixed effects. Estimating the model with GMM is consistent but suffers from small sample bias. We apply Helmert's transformation to the model, assume that error terms and nuisance parameters are homoskedastic and independent across observations and of one another, and utilize the GMM bias calculation of Newey & Smith (2001). This leads to a closed form expression for the GMM bias applied to AR(1) model. Chapter 2: This chapter develops specification tests for quantile regression under various data types. We consider what happens to the quantile regression estimator under local and global misspecification and design specification tests that handle a wide range of data types. We consider how to carry out such tests in practice and present Monte Carlo results to show the effectiveness of such tests. Chapter 3: Through a Taylor expansion, We compute the bias of a general GMM model where the weighting matrix A of the moment conditions g(z, β) is left unspecified, except for some general conditions. Our bias results are compared to those of Newey and West (2003). An important case of GMM estimation with a general weighting matrix A is when A is a function of a vector of parameters with fixed dimension. Arellano's IVE estimator is an example of this type of estimator--we consider the bias properties of Arellano's IVE estimator in the AR(1) setting and compare them to our results from Chapter 1. === by Ziad H. Nejmeldeen. === Ph.D. |
author2 |
Whitney Newey. |
author_facet |
Whitney Newey. Nejmeldeen, Ziad H. (Ziad Hassan), 1976- |
author |
Nejmeldeen, Ziad H. (Ziad Hassan), 1976- |
author_sort |
Nejmeldeen, Ziad H. (Ziad Hassan), 1976- |
title |
General method of moments bias and specification tests for quantile regression |
title_short |
General method of moments bias and specification tests for quantile regression |
title_full |
General method of moments bias and specification tests for quantile regression |
title_fullStr |
General method of moments bias and specification tests for quantile regression |
title_full_unstemmed |
General method of moments bias and specification tests for quantile regression |
title_sort |
general method of moments bias and specification tests for quantile regression |
publisher |
Massachusetts Institute of Technology |
publishDate |
2005 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/17628 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT nejmeldeenziadhziadhassan1976 generalmethodofmomentsbiasandspecificationtestsforquantileregression |
_version_ |
1719042311468351488 |