Pedagogy & Space

Thesis: M. Arch., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Architecture, 2019 === Cataloged from PDF version of thesis. Page 106 blank. === Includes bibliographical references (page 105). === With a Secretary of Education mandating school choice, advocating for more religious and charter...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Garcia, Daniel Joe.
Other Authors: Sheila Kennedy.
Format: Others
Language:English
Published: Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/121871
id ndltd-MIT-oai-dspace.mit.edu-1721.1-121871
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-MIT-oai-dspace.mit.edu-1721.1-1218712019-11-23T03:51:16Z Pedagogy & Space Pedagogy and Space Garcia, Daniel Joe. Sheila Kennedy. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Architecture. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Architecture Architecture. Thesis: M. Arch., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Architecture, 2019 Cataloged from PDF version of thesis. Page 106 blank. Includes bibliographical references (page 105). With a Secretary of Education mandating school choice, advocating for more religious and charter private schools, how does this address the towns that do not have the population to support more than one school? With populations ranging from 500 to 5,000 people, rural towns have to provide public schools that are accessible to everyone in their community. The public school system though is far from perfect. Programs such as "No Child Left Behind" have burdened public schools with meeting standards, leading to multiple choice testing and teaching from standardized textbooks. This has resulted in the standardized architectures of schools which do not address shifts in education towards inventive learning. This culminates in a context where rural towns who do not have the tax base to fund typical new school construction are pushed to go rogue and build a new type of public school. A school designed not by standardized spaces of the past, but by different scales of inventive learning environments that can produce unique spaces for planned and unplanned learning. This opens an opportunity for a new type of architectural practice that can work with rural towns to reimagine a school that is not dedicated to providing consistent spaces to children, with desks in classrooms, but a school that offers variability. The first thing that emerges in rural towns located on the railroad are their large agricultural facilities with grain silos and warehouses. However, with the storage and production of grain moving to larger regional facilities, the silos and warehouses of these towns are moving towards obsolescence. Yet these structures are centrally located and adjacent to residential areas, suggesting an opportunity to adapt the silos and warehouses into typologies for a new type of school. Thus, the first project of the school becomes its own construction, managed by the architect and utilizing the skills of the town, to adapt their rural archetypes from grain production to brain production. by Daniel Joe Garcia. M. Arch. M.Arch. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Architecture 2019-07-22T19:31:51Z 2019-07-22T19:31:51Z 2019 2019 Thesis https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/121871 1102595426 eng MIT theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed, downloaded, or printed from this source but further reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582 106 pages application/pdf Massachusetts Institute of Technology
collection NDLTD
language English
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Architecture.
spellingShingle Architecture.
Garcia, Daniel Joe.
Pedagogy & Space
description Thesis: M. Arch., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Architecture, 2019 === Cataloged from PDF version of thesis. Page 106 blank. === Includes bibliographical references (page 105). === With a Secretary of Education mandating school choice, advocating for more religious and charter private schools, how does this address the towns that do not have the population to support more than one school? With populations ranging from 500 to 5,000 people, rural towns have to provide public schools that are accessible to everyone in their community. The public school system though is far from perfect. Programs such as "No Child Left Behind" have burdened public schools with meeting standards, leading to multiple choice testing and teaching from standardized textbooks. This has resulted in the standardized architectures of schools which do not address shifts in education towards inventive learning. This culminates in a context where rural towns who do not have the tax base to fund typical new school construction are pushed to go rogue and build a new type of public school. === A school designed not by standardized spaces of the past, but by different scales of inventive learning environments that can produce unique spaces for planned and unplanned learning. This opens an opportunity for a new type of architectural practice that can work with rural towns to reimagine a school that is not dedicated to providing consistent spaces to children, with desks in classrooms, but a school that offers variability. The first thing that emerges in rural towns located on the railroad are their large agricultural facilities with grain silos and warehouses. However, with the storage and production of grain moving to larger regional facilities, the silos and warehouses of these towns are moving towards obsolescence. Yet these structures are centrally located and adjacent to residential areas, suggesting an opportunity to adapt the silos and warehouses into typologies for a new type of school. === Thus, the first project of the school becomes its own construction, managed by the architect and utilizing the skills of the town, to adapt their rural archetypes from grain production to brain production. === by Daniel Joe Garcia. === M. Arch. === M.Arch. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Architecture
author2 Sheila Kennedy.
author_facet Sheila Kennedy.
Garcia, Daniel Joe.
author Garcia, Daniel Joe.
author_sort Garcia, Daniel Joe.
title Pedagogy & Space
title_short Pedagogy & Space
title_full Pedagogy & Space
title_fullStr Pedagogy & Space
title_full_unstemmed Pedagogy & Space
title_sort pedagogy & space
publisher Massachusetts Institute of Technology
publishDate 2019
url https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/121871
work_keys_str_mv AT garciadanieljoe pedagogyspace
AT garciadanieljoe pedagogyandspace
_version_ 1719295297019969536