The more the merrier? : understanding the effect of group size on collective intelligence

Thesis: Ph. D., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sloan School of Management, 2017. === Cataloged from PDF version of thesis. === Includes bibliographical references (pages 87-104). === This dissertation explores how group size affects collective intelligence. It is composed of three quantitati...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hashmi, Nada
Other Authors: Thomas W. Malone.
Format: Others
Language:English
Published: Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/113957
id ndltd-MIT-oai-dspace.mit.edu-1721.1-113957
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-MIT-oai-dspace.mit.edu-1721.1-1139572019-05-02T15:57:53Z The more the merrier? : understanding the effect of group size on collective intelligence Hashmi, Nada Thomas W. Malone. Sloan School of Management. Sloan School of Management. Sloan School of Management. Thesis: Ph. D., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sloan School of Management, 2017. Cataloged from PDF version of thesis. Includes bibliographical references (pages 87-104). This dissertation explores how group size affects collective intelligence. It is composed of three quantitative studies. The first study explores how time pressure in small groups (size 4) and large groups (size 20) affected collective intelligence. The results showed that the large groups significantly and consistently outperformed the small groups in different time pressure conditions. This led to the second study which explored whether the collaboration tool used in the first study might have provided unexpected benefits for large groups that counteracted any process loss in the large groups. While the results from the second study confirmed that the collaboration tool did indeed significantly improve the collective intelligence score of groups, one surprising result was that this effect occurred, not only in large groups (size 20), but also in small ones (size 4). The final study then set out to explore this surprising result in further detail by including a variety of group sizes (sizes 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35 and 40) in both the collaboration conditions. It was hypothesized that by including more group sizes, the study would determine whether a curvilinear (inverted-U) relationship existed. The results not only confirmed the curvilinear (inverted-U) relationship but also suggested an optimal group size of about 30 for groups with the collaboration tool and 25 for groups without the collaboration tool. by Nada Hashmi. Ph. D. 2018-03-02T22:20:32Z 2018-03-02T22:20:32Z 2017 2017 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/113957 1023435153 eng MIT theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed, downloaded, or printed from this source but further reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582 104 pages application/pdf Massachusetts Institute of Technology
collection NDLTD
language English
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Sloan School of Management.
spellingShingle Sloan School of Management.
Hashmi, Nada
The more the merrier? : understanding the effect of group size on collective intelligence
description Thesis: Ph. D., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sloan School of Management, 2017. === Cataloged from PDF version of thesis. === Includes bibliographical references (pages 87-104). === This dissertation explores how group size affects collective intelligence. It is composed of three quantitative studies. The first study explores how time pressure in small groups (size 4) and large groups (size 20) affected collective intelligence. The results showed that the large groups significantly and consistently outperformed the small groups in different time pressure conditions. This led to the second study which explored whether the collaboration tool used in the first study might have provided unexpected benefits for large groups that counteracted any process loss in the large groups. While the results from the second study confirmed that the collaboration tool did indeed significantly improve the collective intelligence score of groups, one surprising result was that this effect occurred, not only in large groups (size 20), but also in small ones (size 4). The final study then set out to explore this surprising result in further detail by including a variety of group sizes (sizes 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35 and 40) in both the collaboration conditions. It was hypothesized that by including more group sizes, the study would determine whether a curvilinear (inverted-U) relationship existed. The results not only confirmed the curvilinear (inverted-U) relationship but also suggested an optimal group size of about 30 for groups with the collaboration tool and 25 for groups without the collaboration tool. === by Nada Hashmi. === Ph. D.
author2 Thomas W. Malone.
author_facet Thomas W. Malone.
Hashmi, Nada
author Hashmi, Nada
author_sort Hashmi, Nada
title The more the merrier? : understanding the effect of group size on collective intelligence
title_short The more the merrier? : understanding the effect of group size on collective intelligence
title_full The more the merrier? : understanding the effect of group size on collective intelligence
title_fullStr The more the merrier? : understanding the effect of group size on collective intelligence
title_full_unstemmed The more the merrier? : understanding the effect of group size on collective intelligence
title_sort more the merrier? : understanding the effect of group size on collective intelligence
publisher Massachusetts Institute of Technology
publishDate 2018
url http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/113957
work_keys_str_mv AT hashminada themorethemerrierunderstandingtheeffectofgroupsizeoncollectiveintelligence
AT hashminada morethemerrierunderstandingtheeffectofgroupsizeoncollectiveintelligence
_version_ 1719031651996008448