Comparing two systems of sow group-housing: animal welfare and economics

The objective was to devise a simulation model that could economically compare two group-housing systems for sow operations, a conventional system (CONV) that uses partial-slatted concrete flooring and an alternative system (ALT) that uses straw-covered concrete. Further, the research aimed to deter...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Fynn, Mark Andrew
Other Authors: Johnson, Gary (Agribusiness and Agricultural Economics)
Language:en_US
Published: 2010
Subjects:
sow
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1993/4219
id ndltd-MANITOBA-oai-mspace.lib.umanitoba.ca-1993-4219
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-MANITOBA-oai-mspace.lib.umanitoba.ca-1993-42192014-01-31T03:32:11Z Comparing two systems of sow group-housing: animal welfare and economics Fynn, Mark Andrew Johnson, Gary (Agribusiness and Agricultural Economics) Brewin, Derek (Agribusiness and Agricultural Economics) Connor, Laurie (Animal Science) Andersson, Hans (Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences) sow group-housing economics The objective was to devise a simulation model that could economically compare two group-housing systems for sow operations, a conventional system (CONV) that uses partial-slatted concrete flooring and an alternative system (ALT) that uses straw-covered concrete. Further, the research aimed to determine the optimal parity in which to terminally cull sows. Data were collected on 121 sows between two experimental barns for 7 parities. These data were used to estimate a production function and a culling function. These functions, along with economic data, were used to create an economic simulation model. Production was best predicted by parity and lactation feed intake, and culling was best predicted by parity, weight, and gait score. Optimal terminal culling occurred after parity 6 in ALT and after parity 7 in CONV. Overall, ALT was more profitable than CONV. 2010-09-22T14:57:33Z 2010-09-22T14:57:33Z 2010-09-22T14:57:33Z http://hdl.handle.net/1993/4219 en_US
collection NDLTD
language en_US
sources NDLTD
topic sow
group-housing
economics
spellingShingle sow
group-housing
economics
Fynn, Mark Andrew
Comparing two systems of sow group-housing: animal welfare and economics
description The objective was to devise a simulation model that could economically compare two group-housing systems for sow operations, a conventional system (CONV) that uses partial-slatted concrete flooring and an alternative system (ALT) that uses straw-covered concrete. Further, the research aimed to determine the optimal parity in which to terminally cull sows. Data were collected on 121 sows between two experimental barns for 7 parities. These data were used to estimate a production function and a culling function. These functions, along with economic data, were used to create an economic simulation model. Production was best predicted by parity and lactation feed intake, and culling was best predicted by parity, weight, and gait score. Optimal terminal culling occurred after parity 6 in ALT and after parity 7 in CONV. Overall, ALT was more profitable than CONV.
author2 Johnson, Gary (Agribusiness and Agricultural Economics)
author_facet Johnson, Gary (Agribusiness and Agricultural Economics)
Fynn, Mark Andrew
author Fynn, Mark Andrew
author_sort Fynn, Mark Andrew
title Comparing two systems of sow group-housing: animal welfare and economics
title_short Comparing two systems of sow group-housing: animal welfare and economics
title_full Comparing two systems of sow group-housing: animal welfare and economics
title_fullStr Comparing two systems of sow group-housing: animal welfare and economics
title_full_unstemmed Comparing two systems of sow group-housing: animal welfare and economics
title_sort comparing two systems of sow group-housing: animal welfare and economics
publishDate 2010
url http://hdl.handle.net/1993/4219
work_keys_str_mv AT fynnmarkandrew comparingtwosystemsofsowgrouphousinganimalwelfareandeconomics
_version_ 1716628894185947136