Religious language within Jürgen Habermas and cognitive linguistics

Religious language has been theorized in multiple ways. I will look at how religious language has been theorized in the work of Jürgen Habermas and in the field of cognitive linguistics. I will compare these approaches to religious language and assess the results. In doing so, I will indirectly a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Derkson, Kyle
Other Authors: MacKendrick, Kenneth (Religion) Janzen, Terry (Linguistics)
Published: 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1993/24048
id ndltd-MANITOBA-oai-mspace.lib.umanitoba.ca-1993-24048
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-MANITOBA-oai-mspace.lib.umanitoba.ca-1993-240482015-01-24T03:48:11Z Religious language within Jürgen Habermas and cognitive linguistics Derkson, Kyle MacKendrick, Kenneth (Religion) Janzen, Terry (Linguistics) Lewis, Justin (Religion) Axelrod, Charles (Sociology) cognitive linguistics religious language Jürgen Habermas George Lakoff religion Mark Johnson Formal Pragmatics Ritual Praxis Linguistification of the Sacred Metaphor Image Schema Moral Metaphors Religious language has been theorized in multiple ways. I will look at how religious language has been theorized in the work of Jürgen Habermas and in the field of cognitive linguistics. I will compare these approaches to religious language and assess the results. In doing so, I will indirectly assess the confluence of these two theoretical approaches. My conclusion is that even with the similarities between these theoretical frames, religion is thematized differently under each method. Jürgen Habermas’s definition of religion as the output of ritual praxis is not compatible with the normative place of religious language found in cognitive linguistics. 2014-09-16T21:01:36Z 2014-09-16T21:01:36Z 2014-09-16 http://hdl.handle.net/1993/24048
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
topic cognitive linguistics
religious language
Jürgen Habermas
George Lakoff
religion
Mark Johnson
Formal Pragmatics
Ritual Praxis
Linguistification of the Sacred
Metaphor
Image Schema
Moral Metaphors
spellingShingle cognitive linguistics
religious language
Jürgen Habermas
George Lakoff
religion
Mark Johnson
Formal Pragmatics
Ritual Praxis
Linguistification of the Sacred
Metaphor
Image Schema
Moral Metaphors
Derkson, Kyle
Religious language within Jürgen Habermas and cognitive linguistics
description Religious language has been theorized in multiple ways. I will look at how religious language has been theorized in the work of Jürgen Habermas and in the field of cognitive linguistics. I will compare these approaches to religious language and assess the results. In doing so, I will indirectly assess the confluence of these two theoretical approaches. My conclusion is that even with the similarities between these theoretical frames, religion is thematized differently under each method. Jürgen Habermas’s definition of religion as the output of ritual praxis is not compatible with the normative place of religious language found in cognitive linguistics.
author2 MacKendrick, Kenneth (Religion) Janzen, Terry (Linguistics)
author_facet MacKendrick, Kenneth (Religion) Janzen, Terry (Linguistics)
Derkson, Kyle
author Derkson, Kyle
author_sort Derkson, Kyle
title Religious language within Jürgen Habermas and cognitive linguistics
title_short Religious language within Jürgen Habermas and cognitive linguistics
title_full Religious language within Jürgen Habermas and cognitive linguistics
title_fullStr Religious language within Jürgen Habermas and cognitive linguistics
title_full_unstemmed Religious language within Jürgen Habermas and cognitive linguistics
title_sort religious language within jürgen habermas and cognitive linguistics
publishDate 2014
url http://hdl.handle.net/1993/24048
work_keys_str_mv AT derksonkyle religiouslanguagewithinjurgenhabermasandcognitivelinguistics
_version_ 1716728217438519296