The Body Morph Assessment Version 2.0 (BMA 2.0): A Psychometric Study

A computerized procedure for assessing body image, called the Body Morph Assessment Version 2.0 (BMA 2.0), was developed to serve as reliable and valid measure of body image. The BMA 2.0 is an extention of an earlier prototype called the Body Morph Assessment (BMA; Stewart, Williamson, Smeets, &...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Stewart, Tiffany M.
Other Authors: Donald A. Williamson
Format: Others
Language:en
Published: LSU 2002
Subjects:
Online Access:http://etd.lsu.edu/docs/available/etd-1023102-140854/
id ndltd-LSU-oai-etd.lsu.edu-etd-1023102-140854
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-LSU-oai-etd.lsu.edu-etd-1023102-1408542013-01-07T22:48:07Z The Body Morph Assessment Version 2.0 (BMA 2.0): A Psychometric Study Stewart, Tiffany M. Psychology A computerized procedure for assessing body image, called the Body Morph Assessment Version 2.0 (BMA 2.0), was developed to serve as reliable and valid measure of body image. The BMA 2.0 is an extention of an earlier prototype called the Body Morph Assessment (BMA; Stewart, Williamson, Smeets, & Greenway, 2000). Although flexible in its uses, the BMA 2.0 targets the measurement of body image in people ranging in body size from very thin to very obese. The BMA was evaluated in terms of its psychometric characteristics. A sample of 217 subjects, composed of four distinct groups classified by gender and ethnicity [(White females (n= 107), White males (n=38 ), Black females (n=57) and Black males (n= 15)], were recruited. The lower and upper limit of BMI for the sample was 17.78 and 56.68. Validity studies were conducted to assess the content, convergent and discriminant validity of the BMA 2.0. A study of convergent validity was conducted to assess the BMA 2.0s association with measures designed to assess body image. Measures that were utilized for this purpose were; Body Image Assessment-Obesity (BIA-O: Williamson, 1997), and the Body Satisfaction Scale (BSS; Slade, Dewey, Newton, Brodie & Keimle, 1990). A study of discriminant validity was conducted to assess the proposed measures association with the restraint scale of the Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ; Stunkard & Messick, 1985). The BMA 2.0 was found to have good convergent and discriminant validity. Test-retest reliability was found to be adequate. The study also investigated the association between perceived BMI and BMA goals. The BMA 2.0 can be used for the prediction of success in the task of weight loss, and in treatment outcome studies for eating disorders and obesity. Donald A. Williamson Paula Geiselman Amy Copeland Robert Wood Lily Allen LSU 2002-10-25 text application/pdf http://etd.lsu.edu/docs/available/etd-1023102-140854/ http://etd.lsu.edu/docs/available/etd-1023102-140854/ en unrestricted I hereby grant to LSU or its agents the right to archive and to make available my thesis or dissertation in whole or in part in the University Libraries in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all proprietary rights, such as patent rights. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis or dissertation.
collection NDLTD
language en
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Psychology
spellingShingle Psychology
Stewart, Tiffany M.
The Body Morph Assessment Version 2.0 (BMA 2.0): A Psychometric Study
description A computerized procedure for assessing body image, called the Body Morph Assessment Version 2.0 (BMA 2.0), was developed to serve as reliable and valid measure of body image. The BMA 2.0 is an extention of an earlier prototype called the Body Morph Assessment (BMA; Stewart, Williamson, Smeets, & Greenway, 2000). Although flexible in its uses, the BMA 2.0 targets the measurement of body image in people ranging in body size from very thin to very obese. The BMA was evaluated in terms of its psychometric characteristics. A sample of 217 subjects, composed of four distinct groups classified by gender and ethnicity [(White females (n= 107), White males (n=38 ), Black females (n=57) and Black males (n= 15)], were recruited. The lower and upper limit of BMI for the sample was 17.78 and 56.68. Validity studies were conducted to assess the content, convergent and discriminant validity of the BMA 2.0. A study of convergent validity was conducted to assess the BMA 2.0s association with measures designed to assess body image. Measures that were utilized for this purpose were; Body Image Assessment-Obesity (BIA-O: Williamson, 1997), and the Body Satisfaction Scale (BSS; Slade, Dewey, Newton, Brodie & Keimle, 1990). A study of discriminant validity was conducted to assess the proposed measures association with the restraint scale of the Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ; Stunkard & Messick, 1985). The BMA 2.0 was found to have good convergent and discriminant validity. Test-retest reliability was found to be adequate. The study also investigated the association between perceived BMI and BMA goals. The BMA 2.0 can be used for the prediction of success in the task of weight loss, and in treatment outcome studies for eating disorders and obesity.
author2 Donald A. Williamson
author_facet Donald A. Williamson
Stewart, Tiffany M.
author Stewart, Tiffany M.
author_sort Stewart, Tiffany M.
title The Body Morph Assessment Version 2.0 (BMA 2.0): A Psychometric Study
title_short The Body Morph Assessment Version 2.0 (BMA 2.0): A Psychometric Study
title_full The Body Morph Assessment Version 2.0 (BMA 2.0): A Psychometric Study
title_fullStr The Body Morph Assessment Version 2.0 (BMA 2.0): A Psychometric Study
title_full_unstemmed The Body Morph Assessment Version 2.0 (BMA 2.0): A Psychometric Study
title_sort body morph assessment version 2.0 (bma 2.0): a psychometric study
publisher LSU
publishDate 2002
url http://etd.lsu.edu/docs/available/etd-1023102-140854/
work_keys_str_mv AT stewarttiffanym thebodymorphassessmentversion20bma20apsychometricstudy
AT stewarttiffanym bodymorphassessmentversion20bma20apsychometricstudy
_version_ 1716476680188461056