Knowledge Representation Acquired in a Dynamic Process Control Task

The dissociation between explicit and implicit knowledge has been shown in a number of previous studies utilizing the process control task, where participants would learn to control the system well, but not be able to verbally articulate their knowledge (Berry & Broadbent, 1984; Berry & Broa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Prattini, Robert
Other Authors: Robert Mathews
Format: Others
Language:en
Published: LSU 2006
Subjects:
Online Access:http://etd.lsu.edu/docs/available/etd-09252006-134408/
id ndltd-LSU-oai-etd.lsu.edu-etd-09252006-134408
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-LSU-oai-etd.lsu.edu-etd-09252006-1344082013-01-07T22:50:51Z Knowledge Representation Acquired in a Dynamic Process Control Task Prattini, Robert Psychology The dissociation between explicit and implicit knowledge has been shown in a number of previous studies utilizing the process control task, where participants would learn to control the system well, but not be able to verbally articulate their knowledge (Berry & Broadbent, 1984; Berry & Broadbent, 1988; Mathews, Buss, Stanley, Blanchard-Fields, Cho, & Druhan, 1989; Roussel, 1999; Sun & Mathews, 2005). This study attempts to advance this basic research in the area of implicit learning by examining the type of mental knowledge representation acquired in implicitly learned tasks, and also assess the transfer of that knowledge to conceptually similar tasks. Participants controlled a simulated nuclear reactor version of the process control task by inputting a selected number of fuel pellets to maintain a desired temperature on several tests over 2 one-hour sessions after receiving either instructions to perform the task through visual means, memorizing exemplars, receiving hints about how the task operates, or receiving no instruction. Results show that participants performance improves with experiential practice, even after memorizing the best responses on standard tests. Results from transfer tests (i.e., a novel target level and a different scale than previously practiced) suggest that explicit knowledge is less transferable than the implicit knowledge acquired through practice in this task. This study did not support that the process control task is normally learned through visual recognition of patterns of inputs and outputs across trials- however, the results neither support that the task is normally learned by the storage of exemplars in the form of a look-up table (Dienes & Fahey, 1995). Robert Mathews Sean Lane Tracey Rizzuto LSU 2006-09-26 text application/pdf http://etd.lsu.edu/docs/available/etd-09252006-134408/ http://etd.lsu.edu/docs/available/etd-09252006-134408/ en unrestricted I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached herein a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to LSU or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below and in appropriate University policies, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report.
collection NDLTD
language en
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Psychology
spellingShingle Psychology
Prattini, Robert
Knowledge Representation Acquired in a Dynamic Process Control Task
description The dissociation between explicit and implicit knowledge has been shown in a number of previous studies utilizing the process control task, where participants would learn to control the system well, but not be able to verbally articulate their knowledge (Berry & Broadbent, 1984; Berry & Broadbent, 1988; Mathews, Buss, Stanley, Blanchard-Fields, Cho, & Druhan, 1989; Roussel, 1999; Sun & Mathews, 2005). This study attempts to advance this basic research in the area of implicit learning by examining the type of mental knowledge representation acquired in implicitly learned tasks, and also assess the transfer of that knowledge to conceptually similar tasks. Participants controlled a simulated nuclear reactor version of the process control task by inputting a selected number of fuel pellets to maintain a desired temperature on several tests over 2 one-hour sessions after receiving either instructions to perform the task through visual means, memorizing exemplars, receiving hints about how the task operates, or receiving no instruction. Results show that participants performance improves with experiential practice, even after memorizing the best responses on standard tests. Results from transfer tests (i.e., a novel target level and a different scale than previously practiced) suggest that explicit knowledge is less transferable than the implicit knowledge acquired through practice in this task. This study did not support that the process control task is normally learned through visual recognition of patterns of inputs and outputs across trials- however, the results neither support that the task is normally learned by the storage of exemplars in the form of a look-up table (Dienes & Fahey, 1995).
author2 Robert Mathews
author_facet Robert Mathews
Prattini, Robert
author Prattini, Robert
author_sort Prattini, Robert
title Knowledge Representation Acquired in a Dynamic Process Control Task
title_short Knowledge Representation Acquired in a Dynamic Process Control Task
title_full Knowledge Representation Acquired in a Dynamic Process Control Task
title_fullStr Knowledge Representation Acquired in a Dynamic Process Control Task
title_full_unstemmed Knowledge Representation Acquired in a Dynamic Process Control Task
title_sort knowledge representation acquired in a dynamic process control task
publisher LSU
publishDate 2006
url http://etd.lsu.edu/docs/available/etd-09252006-134408/
work_keys_str_mv AT prattinirobert knowledgerepresentationacquiredinadynamicprocesscontroltask
_version_ 1716477435041546240