The Apologia of Franchino Gafurio: A Critical Edition and Translation
Franchino Gafurios Apologia (Turin, 1520) is one musical treatise in a series of works that constituted the famous pamphlet war between he and Giovanni Spataro. The dispute originated with the publication of Bartholomeo Ramis de Pareias Musica practica (Bologna, 1482). Unconventional and unapologet...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Language: | en |
Published: |
LSU
2007
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://etd.lsu.edu/docs/available/etd-08312007-102354/ |
id |
ndltd-LSU-oai-etd.lsu.edu-etd-08312007-102354 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-LSU-oai-etd.lsu.edu-etd-08312007-1023542013-01-07T22:51:19Z The Apologia of Franchino Gafurio: A Critical Edition and Translation Kaufman, Patrick Joseph Music Franchino Gafurios Apologia (Turin, 1520) is one musical treatise in a series of works that constituted the famous pamphlet war between he and Giovanni Spataro. The dispute originated with the publication of Bartholomeo Ramis de Pareias Musica practica (Bologna, 1482). Unconventional and unapologetically critical, Ramis rejected venerated musical traditions in an attempt to align music theory with contemporary music practice. He opposed the Pythagorean division of the monochord and Guidonian solmization syllables, and instead proposed a division which produced pure thirds, and a solmization system based on the octave. His iconoclastic proposals and his highly sarcastic tone called forth a firestorm of backlash. Gafurio entered the debate as an opponent of Ramis, though his main focus was on Spataro: his Apologia, Epistula prima in solutiones obiectorum Io. Vaginarii Bononiensis (Milan, 1521), and Epistula secunda apologetica (Milan, 1521) all respond to claims made by Spataro. Gafurio and Spataro then engaged in a private correspondence lasting a quarter century, of which many of the letters are now lost. Thus, the works of Gafurio serve to frame the entire course of the controversy. This fifty year period was very important in the development of music. The changes proposed by Ramis and later defended by Spataro constitute a distinct shift in the way in which earlier theoretical ideas were valued. Seemingly indisputable laws concerning the practice and composition of music were now re-examined under the lens of humanistic empiricism. This new edition of Gafurios Apologia will be a contribution to the larger body of research on Gafurio and his role in the controversy. Of Gafurios nine printed works, only three, Theorica musice (Milan, 1492), Practica musice (Milan, 1496), and De harmonia musicorum instrumentorum opus (Milan, 1518), exist in English translation. The theorists involved in the controversy were of the first generation to see their works printed, and of them, Gafurio was arguably the most influential. Jan W. Herlinger Alison McFarland Andreas Giger LSU 2007-09-04 text application/pdf http://etd.lsu.edu/docs/available/etd-08312007-102354/ http://etd.lsu.edu/docs/available/etd-08312007-102354/ en unrestricted I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached herein a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to LSU or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below and in appropriate University policies, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report. |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
en |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
Music |
spellingShingle |
Music Kaufman, Patrick Joseph The Apologia of Franchino Gafurio: A Critical Edition and Translation |
description |
Franchino Gafurios Apologia (Turin, 1520) is one musical treatise in a series of works that constituted the famous pamphlet war between he and Giovanni Spataro. The dispute originated with the publication of Bartholomeo Ramis de Pareias Musica practica (Bologna, 1482). Unconventional and unapologetically critical, Ramis rejected venerated musical traditions in an attempt to align music theory with contemporary music practice. He opposed the Pythagorean division of the monochord and Guidonian solmization syllables, and instead proposed a division which produced pure thirds, and a solmization system based on the octave. His iconoclastic proposals and his highly sarcastic tone called forth a firestorm of backlash.
Gafurio entered the debate as an opponent of Ramis, though his main focus was on Spataro: his Apologia, Epistula prima in solutiones obiectorum Io. Vaginarii Bononiensis (Milan, 1521), and Epistula secunda apologetica (Milan, 1521) all respond to claims made by Spataro. Gafurio and Spataro then engaged in a private correspondence lasting a quarter century, of which many of the letters are now lost. Thus, the works of Gafurio serve to frame the entire course of the controversy.
This fifty year period was very important in the development of music. The changes proposed by Ramis and later defended by Spataro constitute a distinct shift in the way in which earlier theoretical ideas were valued. Seemingly indisputable laws concerning the practice and composition of music were now re-examined under the lens of humanistic empiricism.
This new edition of Gafurios Apologia will be a contribution to the larger body of research on Gafurio and his role in the controversy. Of Gafurios nine printed works, only three, Theorica musice (Milan, 1492), Practica musice (Milan, 1496), and De harmonia musicorum instrumentorum opus (Milan, 1518), exist in English translation. The theorists involved in the controversy were of the first generation to see their works printed, and of them, Gafurio was arguably the most influential.
|
author2 |
Jan W. Herlinger |
author_facet |
Jan W. Herlinger Kaufman, Patrick Joseph |
author |
Kaufman, Patrick Joseph |
author_sort |
Kaufman, Patrick Joseph |
title |
The Apologia of Franchino Gafurio: A Critical Edition and Translation |
title_short |
The Apologia of Franchino Gafurio: A Critical Edition and Translation |
title_full |
The Apologia of Franchino Gafurio: A Critical Edition and Translation |
title_fullStr |
The Apologia of Franchino Gafurio: A Critical Edition and Translation |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Apologia of Franchino Gafurio: A Critical Edition and Translation |
title_sort |
apologia of franchino gafurio: a critical edition and translation |
publisher |
LSU |
publishDate |
2007 |
url |
http://etd.lsu.edu/docs/available/etd-08312007-102354/ |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT kaufmanpatrickjoseph theapologiaoffranchinogafurioacriticaleditionandtranslation AT kaufmanpatrickjoseph apologiaoffranchinogafurioacriticaleditionandtranslation |
_version_ |
1716477422246821888 |