Viewing Novels, Reading Films: Stanley Kubrick and the Art of Adaptation as Interpretation
Greg Jenkins has observed that adaptation "is a presence that is woven into the very fabric of film culture." Although this statement is true, no definitive theory of adaptation exists. Critics and scholars ponder adaptation, yet cannot seem to agree on what makes an adaptation a success...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Language: | en |
Published: |
LSU
2006
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://etd.lsu.edu/docs/available/etd-07122006-171959/ |
id |
ndltd-LSU-oai-etd.lsu.edu-etd-07122006-171959 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-LSU-oai-etd.lsu.edu-etd-07122006-1719592013-01-07T22:50:44Z Viewing Novels, Reading Films: Stanley Kubrick and the Art of Adaptation as Interpretation Bane, Charles English Greg Jenkins has observed that adaptation "is a presence that is woven into the very fabric of film culture." Although this statement is true, no definitive theory of adaptation exists. Critics and scholars ponder adaptation, yet cannot seem to agree on what makes an adaptation a success or a failure. The problem of adaptation stems from many sources. What, if anything, does a film owe the novel on which it is based? How, if possible, does a film remain faithful to its source? Is a film a version of a story or its own autonomous work of art? Who is the author of this work? What is an Author? Which text is given primacy: the novel or the film? What is a Text? These questions, and many others, are at the heart of adaptation studies. This project does not pretend to address them all, nor does it claim to be the final answer to the question of adaptation. It does, however, provide a possible solution that is both theoretical and practical. It is theoretical in that it asks viewers to consider what a particular adaptation is doing with a film; practical in that it attempts to bring method to the madness by applying the theory to a sample case study: Stanley Kubrick. Kubrick is not an arbitrary choice as he encompasses the major questions of adaptation. Although all of Kubrick's major films were based on works of fiction, he fits into that highest echelon of filmmakers, the auteur. He is the unquestioned "author" of his canon. The range of Kubrick's films also proves useful for this study: most of Kubrick's adaptations are successful, a few are not; many of his films have surpassed their literary ancestors, others have elevated them to new heights; some stay rather faithful to the source text, others deviate greatly. This discussion will consider the films of Kubrick's canon that center on two of his recurring themes, love and war, by considering each novel's thematic appeal for Kubrick followed by an analysis of the film in terms of what it is doing with the text. John Mastrogianakos David Madden Brannon Costello Carl Freedman John R. May Rodger M. Payne LSU 2006-07-13 text application/pdf http://etd.lsu.edu/docs/available/etd-07122006-171959/ http://etd.lsu.edu/docs/available/etd-07122006-171959/ en unrestricted I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached herein a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to LSU or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below and in appropriate University policies, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report. |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
en |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
English |
spellingShingle |
English Bane, Charles Viewing Novels, Reading Films: Stanley Kubrick and the Art of Adaptation as Interpretation |
description |
Greg Jenkins has observed that adaptation "is a presence that is woven into the very fabric of film culture." Although this statement is true, no definitive theory of adaptation exists. Critics and scholars ponder adaptation, yet cannot seem to agree on what makes an adaptation a success or a failure. The problem of adaptation stems from many sources. What, if anything, does a film owe the novel on which it is based? How, if possible, does a film remain faithful to its source? Is a film a version of a story or its own autonomous work of art? Who is the author of this work? What is an Author? Which text is given primacy: the novel or the film? What is a Text?
These questions, and many others, are at the heart of adaptation studies. This project does not pretend to address them all, nor does it claim to be the final answer to the question of adaptation. It does, however, provide a possible solution that is both theoretical and practical. It is theoretical in that it asks viewers to consider what a particular adaptation is doing with a film; practical in that it attempts to bring method to the madness by applying the theory to a sample case study: Stanley Kubrick. Kubrick is not an arbitrary choice as he encompasses the major questions of adaptation. Although all of Kubrick's major films were based on works of fiction, he fits into that highest echelon of filmmakers, the auteur. He is the unquestioned "author" of his canon. The range of Kubrick's films also proves useful for this study: most of Kubrick's adaptations are successful, a few are not; many of his films have surpassed their literary ancestors, others have elevated them to new heights; some stay rather faithful to the source text, others deviate greatly. This discussion will consider the films of Kubrick's canon that center on two of his recurring themes, love and war, by considering each novel's thematic appeal for Kubrick followed by an analysis of the film in terms of what it is doing with the text. |
author2 |
John Mastrogianakos |
author_facet |
John Mastrogianakos Bane, Charles |
author |
Bane, Charles |
author_sort |
Bane, Charles |
title |
Viewing Novels, Reading Films: Stanley Kubrick and the Art of Adaptation as Interpretation |
title_short |
Viewing Novels, Reading Films: Stanley Kubrick and the Art of Adaptation as Interpretation |
title_full |
Viewing Novels, Reading Films: Stanley Kubrick and the Art of Adaptation as Interpretation |
title_fullStr |
Viewing Novels, Reading Films: Stanley Kubrick and the Art of Adaptation as Interpretation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Viewing Novels, Reading Films: Stanley Kubrick and the Art of Adaptation as Interpretation |
title_sort |
viewing novels, reading films: stanley kubrick and the art of adaptation as interpretation |
publisher |
LSU |
publishDate |
2006 |
url |
http://etd.lsu.edu/docs/available/etd-07122006-171959/ |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT banecharles viewingnovelsreadingfilmsstanleykubrickandtheartofadaptationasinterpretation |
_version_ |
1716477387510644736 |