The Rhetorical Myth of the Athlete as a Moral Hero: The Implications of Steroids in Sport and the Threatened Myth

This research analyzes changes in the rhetoric of a sustaining myth in order to better assess what happens when a myth is threatened. By examining American sport and its current struggle to withstand the widespread use of steroids, the author investigates how public discourse about the scandal turns...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hartman, Karen L.
Other Authors: Roland Mitchell
Format: Others
Language:en
Published: LSU 2008
Subjects:
Online Access:http://etd.lsu.edu/docs/available/etd-07102008-110841/
id ndltd-LSU-oai-etd.lsu.edu-etd-07102008-110841
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-LSU-oai-etd.lsu.edu-etd-07102008-1108412013-01-07T22:51:47Z The Rhetorical Myth of the Athlete as a Moral Hero: The Implications of Steroids in Sport and the Threatened Myth Hartman, Karen L. Communication Studies This research analyzes changes in the rhetoric of a sustaining myth in order to better assess what happens when a myth is threatened. By examining American sport and its current struggle to withstand the widespread use of steroids, the author investigates how public discourse about the scandal turns athletes from mythical heroes to cheaters. The author begins by explicating the rhetorical construction of the athlete as a moral hero in America and how this myth is perpetuated today. The author then examines how steroids threaten the myth of the moral athlete and uses Major League Baseball as a case study to illustrate the rhetorical justification of their use. Ultimately this research offers a cyclical method of mythical analysis as a new method to analyze threatened myths. Current research offers few methods to explain how myths develop and this cyclical method attempts to provide specificity for one-way myths can survive. It is argued that the cyclical method acts as a way to account for threats to the myth, as well as to allow for rhetorical shifts. Roland Mitchell Patrick McGee Ruth Bowman Stephanie Grey Andrew King LSU 2008-07-11 text application/pdf http://etd.lsu.edu/docs/available/etd-07102008-110841/ http://etd.lsu.edu/docs/available/etd-07102008-110841/ en unrestricted I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached herein a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to LSU or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below and in appropriate University policies, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report.
collection NDLTD
language en
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Communication Studies
spellingShingle Communication Studies
Hartman, Karen L.
The Rhetorical Myth of the Athlete as a Moral Hero: The Implications of Steroids in Sport and the Threatened Myth
description This research analyzes changes in the rhetoric of a sustaining myth in order to better assess what happens when a myth is threatened. By examining American sport and its current struggle to withstand the widespread use of steroids, the author investigates how public discourse about the scandal turns athletes from mythical heroes to cheaters. The author begins by explicating the rhetorical construction of the athlete as a moral hero in America and how this myth is perpetuated today. The author then examines how steroids threaten the myth of the moral athlete and uses Major League Baseball as a case study to illustrate the rhetorical justification of their use. Ultimately this research offers a cyclical method of mythical analysis as a new method to analyze threatened myths. Current research offers few methods to explain how myths develop and this cyclical method attempts to provide specificity for one-way myths can survive. It is argued that the cyclical method acts as a way to account for threats to the myth, as well as to allow for rhetorical shifts.
author2 Roland Mitchell
author_facet Roland Mitchell
Hartman, Karen L.
author Hartman, Karen L.
author_sort Hartman, Karen L.
title The Rhetorical Myth of the Athlete as a Moral Hero: The Implications of Steroids in Sport and the Threatened Myth
title_short The Rhetorical Myth of the Athlete as a Moral Hero: The Implications of Steroids in Sport and the Threatened Myth
title_full The Rhetorical Myth of the Athlete as a Moral Hero: The Implications of Steroids in Sport and the Threatened Myth
title_fullStr The Rhetorical Myth of the Athlete as a Moral Hero: The Implications of Steroids in Sport and the Threatened Myth
title_full_unstemmed The Rhetorical Myth of the Athlete as a Moral Hero: The Implications of Steroids in Sport and the Threatened Myth
title_sort rhetorical myth of the athlete as a moral hero: the implications of steroids in sport and the threatened myth
publisher LSU
publishDate 2008
url http://etd.lsu.edu/docs/available/etd-07102008-110841/
work_keys_str_mv AT hartmankarenl therhetoricalmythoftheathleteasamoralherotheimplicationsofsteroidsinsportandthethreatenedmyth
AT hartmankarenl rhetoricalmythoftheathleteasamoralherotheimplicationsofsteroidsinsportandthethreatenedmyth
_version_ 1716477366284320768