Brief Interventions for Heavy College Drinkers: Randomized Clinical Trial to Investigate Comparable Efficacy of Two Active Conditions

Brief interventions for college heavy drinkers have shown promise in reducing drinking and related negative consequences. However, since duration of the intervention, content, method of delivery, and duration of the follow up period vary across studies, we do not know whether length of the intervent...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kulesza, Magdalena
Other Authors: Elliott, Emily
Format: Others
Language:en
Published: LSU 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:http://etd.lsu.edu/docs/available/etd-06282011-161247/
id ndltd-LSU-oai-etd.lsu.edu-etd-06282011-161247
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-LSU-oai-etd.lsu.edu-etd-06282011-1612472013-01-07T22:53:26Z Brief Interventions for Heavy College Drinkers: Randomized Clinical Trial to Investigate Comparable Efficacy of Two Active Conditions Kulesza, Magdalena Psychology Brief interventions for college heavy drinkers have shown promise in reducing drinking and related negative consequences. However, since duration of the intervention, content, method of delivery, and duration of the follow up period vary across studies, we do not know whether length of the intervention has an impact on its effectiveness. In the present study, we conducted a randomized trial systematically evaluating efficacy of two brief interventions aimed at reducing alcohol use and consequences among college student drinkers. In addition, we evaluated treatment mediators and moderators. We randomly assigned 278 heavy drinking students to a 10-minute brief intervention, a 50-minute brief intervention, or attention-control group. Both interventions were provided by clinical graduate students trained in Brief Alcohol Screening and Intervention for College Students (BASICS) and included personalized feedback on alcohol consumption including information about norms, effects of alcohol and advice on ways to reduce risks associated with drinking. As hypothesized, both active conditions were more efficacious than the control in reduction of alcohol consumption. However, we did not achieve the same results for alcohol-related problems. In addition, hypothesized mediators of intervention efficacy were partially supported. Specifically while our results supported alcohol drinking norms and coping behavioral strategies as mediators, we did not find support for self-efficacy nor for alcohol expectancies. Moreover, hypothesized moderators of interventions efficacy (i.e. gender, readiness to change, and drinking motives) were not supported either. Given the preliminary nature of our investigation, more research is warranted in this area. Elliott, Emily Guin, Cecile C. Gouvier, William Drew Copeland,, Amy L.. Cohen, Alex LSU 2011-07-01 text application/pdf http://etd.lsu.edu/docs/available/etd-06282011-161247/ http://etd.lsu.edu/docs/available/etd-06282011-161247/ en unrestricted I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached herein a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to LSU or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below and in appropriate University policies, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report.
collection NDLTD
language en
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Psychology
spellingShingle Psychology
Kulesza, Magdalena
Brief Interventions for Heavy College Drinkers: Randomized Clinical Trial to Investigate Comparable Efficacy of Two Active Conditions
description Brief interventions for college heavy drinkers have shown promise in reducing drinking and related negative consequences. However, since duration of the intervention, content, method of delivery, and duration of the follow up period vary across studies, we do not know whether length of the intervention has an impact on its effectiveness. In the present study, we conducted a randomized trial systematically evaluating efficacy of two brief interventions aimed at reducing alcohol use and consequences among college student drinkers. In addition, we evaluated treatment mediators and moderators. We randomly assigned 278 heavy drinking students to a 10-minute brief intervention, a 50-minute brief intervention, or attention-control group. Both interventions were provided by clinical graduate students trained in Brief Alcohol Screening and Intervention for College Students (BASICS) and included personalized feedback on alcohol consumption including information about norms, effects of alcohol and advice on ways to reduce risks associated with drinking. As hypothesized, both active conditions were more efficacious than the control in reduction of alcohol consumption. However, we did not achieve the same results for alcohol-related problems. In addition, hypothesized mediators of intervention efficacy were partially supported. Specifically while our results supported alcohol drinking norms and coping behavioral strategies as mediators, we did not find support for self-efficacy nor for alcohol expectancies. Moreover, hypothesized moderators of interventions efficacy (i.e. gender, readiness to change, and drinking motives) were not supported either. Given the preliminary nature of our investigation, more research is warranted in this area.
author2 Elliott, Emily
author_facet Elliott, Emily
Kulesza, Magdalena
author Kulesza, Magdalena
author_sort Kulesza, Magdalena
title Brief Interventions for Heavy College Drinkers: Randomized Clinical Trial to Investigate Comparable Efficacy of Two Active Conditions
title_short Brief Interventions for Heavy College Drinkers: Randomized Clinical Trial to Investigate Comparable Efficacy of Two Active Conditions
title_full Brief Interventions for Heavy College Drinkers: Randomized Clinical Trial to Investigate Comparable Efficacy of Two Active Conditions
title_fullStr Brief Interventions for Heavy College Drinkers: Randomized Clinical Trial to Investigate Comparable Efficacy of Two Active Conditions
title_full_unstemmed Brief Interventions for Heavy College Drinkers: Randomized Clinical Trial to Investigate Comparable Efficacy of Two Active Conditions
title_sort brief interventions for heavy college drinkers: randomized clinical trial to investigate comparable efficacy of two active conditions
publisher LSU
publishDate 2011
url http://etd.lsu.edu/docs/available/etd-06282011-161247/
work_keys_str_mv AT kuleszamagdalena briefinterventionsforheavycollegedrinkersrandomizedclinicaltrialtoinvestigatecomparableefficacyoftwoactiveconditions
_version_ 1716478143818104832