Brief Interventions for Heavy College Drinkers: Randomized Clinical Trial to Investigate Comparable Efficacy of Two Active Conditions
Brief interventions for college heavy drinkers have shown promise in reducing drinking and related negative consequences. However, since duration of the intervention, content, method of delivery, and duration of the follow up period vary across studies, we do not know whether length of the intervent...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Language: | en |
Published: |
LSU
2011
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://etd.lsu.edu/docs/available/etd-06282011-161247/ |
id |
ndltd-LSU-oai-etd.lsu.edu-etd-06282011-161247 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-LSU-oai-etd.lsu.edu-etd-06282011-1612472013-01-07T22:53:26Z Brief Interventions for Heavy College Drinkers: Randomized Clinical Trial to Investigate Comparable Efficacy of Two Active Conditions Kulesza, Magdalena Psychology Brief interventions for college heavy drinkers have shown promise in reducing drinking and related negative consequences. However, since duration of the intervention, content, method of delivery, and duration of the follow up period vary across studies, we do not know whether length of the intervention has an impact on its effectiveness. In the present study, we conducted a randomized trial systematically evaluating efficacy of two brief interventions aimed at reducing alcohol use and consequences among college student drinkers. In addition, we evaluated treatment mediators and moderators. We randomly assigned 278 heavy drinking students to a 10-minute brief intervention, a 50-minute brief intervention, or attention-control group. Both interventions were provided by clinical graduate students trained in Brief Alcohol Screening and Intervention for College Students (BASICS) and included personalized feedback on alcohol consumption including information about norms, effects of alcohol and advice on ways to reduce risks associated with drinking. As hypothesized, both active conditions were more efficacious than the control in reduction of alcohol consumption. However, we did not achieve the same results for alcohol-related problems. In addition, hypothesized mediators of intervention efficacy were partially supported. Specifically while our results supported alcohol drinking norms and coping behavioral strategies as mediators, we did not find support for self-efficacy nor for alcohol expectancies. Moreover, hypothesized moderators of interventions efficacy (i.e. gender, readiness to change, and drinking motives) were not supported either. Given the preliminary nature of our investigation, more research is warranted in this area. Elliott, Emily Guin, Cecile C. Gouvier, William Drew Copeland,, Amy L.. Cohen, Alex LSU 2011-07-01 text application/pdf http://etd.lsu.edu/docs/available/etd-06282011-161247/ http://etd.lsu.edu/docs/available/etd-06282011-161247/ en unrestricted I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached herein a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to LSU or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below and in appropriate University policies, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report. |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
en |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
Psychology |
spellingShingle |
Psychology Kulesza, Magdalena Brief Interventions for Heavy College Drinkers: Randomized Clinical Trial to Investigate Comparable Efficacy of Two Active Conditions |
description |
Brief interventions for college heavy drinkers have shown promise in reducing drinking and related negative consequences. However, since duration of the intervention, content, method of delivery, and duration of the follow up period vary across studies, we do not know whether length of the intervention has an impact on its effectiveness. In the present study, we conducted a randomized trial systematically evaluating efficacy of two brief interventions aimed at reducing alcohol use and consequences among college student drinkers. In addition, we evaluated treatment mediators and moderators. We randomly assigned 278 heavy drinking students to a 10-minute brief intervention, a 50-minute brief intervention, or attention-control group. Both interventions were provided by clinical graduate students trained in Brief Alcohol Screening and Intervention for College Students (BASICS) and included personalized feedback on alcohol consumption including information about norms, effects of alcohol and advice on ways to reduce risks associated with drinking. As hypothesized, both active conditions were more efficacious than the control in reduction of alcohol consumption. However, we did not achieve the same results for alcohol-related problems. In addition, hypothesized mediators of intervention efficacy were partially supported. Specifically while our results supported alcohol drinking norms and coping behavioral strategies as mediators, we did not find support for self-efficacy nor for alcohol expectancies. Moreover, hypothesized moderators of interventions efficacy (i.e. gender, readiness to change, and drinking motives) were not supported either. Given the preliminary nature of our investigation, more research is warranted in this area. |
author2 |
Elliott, Emily |
author_facet |
Elliott, Emily Kulesza, Magdalena |
author |
Kulesza, Magdalena |
author_sort |
Kulesza, Magdalena |
title |
Brief Interventions for Heavy College Drinkers: Randomized Clinical Trial to Investigate Comparable Efficacy of Two Active Conditions |
title_short |
Brief Interventions for Heavy College Drinkers: Randomized Clinical Trial to Investigate Comparable Efficacy of Two Active Conditions |
title_full |
Brief Interventions for Heavy College Drinkers: Randomized Clinical Trial to Investigate Comparable Efficacy of Two Active Conditions |
title_fullStr |
Brief Interventions for Heavy College Drinkers: Randomized Clinical Trial to Investigate Comparable Efficacy of Two Active Conditions |
title_full_unstemmed |
Brief Interventions for Heavy College Drinkers: Randomized Clinical Trial to Investigate Comparable Efficacy of Two Active Conditions |
title_sort |
brief interventions for heavy college drinkers: randomized clinical trial to investigate comparable efficacy of two active conditions |
publisher |
LSU |
publishDate |
2011 |
url |
http://etd.lsu.edu/docs/available/etd-06282011-161247/ |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT kuleszamagdalena briefinterventionsforheavycollegedrinkersrandomizedclinicaltrialtoinvestigatecomparableefficacyoftwoactiveconditions |
_version_ |
1716478143818104832 |