Impact of Watershed Delineation Detail on Hydrologic Process Modeling in Low Slope Areas

Ascension Parish, located along the Mississippi River in southern Louisiana, is a low-lying, low slope landscape that primarily drains into the tidally-influenced Lake Maurepas. The predominant method of drainage within the parish is gravity drainage. Ascension Parish is currently one of the fastest...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Braud, Jason Alexander
Other Authors: Roy Dokka
Format: Others
Language:en
Published: LSU 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:http://etd.lsu.edu/docs/available/etd-04152009-122340/
id ndltd-LSU-oai-etd.lsu.edu-etd-04152009-122340
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-LSU-oai-etd.lsu.edu-etd-04152009-1223402013-01-07T22:52:08Z Impact of Watershed Delineation Detail on Hydrologic Process Modeling in Low Slope Areas Braud, Jason Alexander Civil & Environmental Engineering Ascension Parish, located along the Mississippi River in southern Louisiana, is a low-lying, low slope landscape that primarily drains into the tidally-influenced Lake Maurepas. The predominant method of drainage within the parish is gravity drainage. Ascension Parish is currently one of the fastest growing areas in the United States. New developments have changed the areas hydrology along with its landscape. Proper watershed delineation within the parish is critical for the management of and future improvements to the parishs drainage infrastructure. Most of the recent drainage modeling in the parish has been performed using a light detection and ranging (LIDAR) digital elevation model (DEM). There are a number of software applications available which provide automated watershed delineation tools. Most automated watershed delineation tools only require a DEM as input; however, other data, such as a stream network shapefile, can be used to force the automated watershed delineation tool to consider certain known existing conditions. Stream network shapefiles can vary in the detail they provide. By running an automated watershed delineation tool using stream networks of varying detail, the effects of their detail on the watershed delineation process can be quantified. Results showed significant differences in watershed area and watershed orientation across the three different delineations completed using different stream network inputs. The detailed stream network breached inaccurate hydrologic barriers present in the DEM. These barriers were the main cause of differences between the three sets of watersheds. When delineating a watershed, the number of sub-basins that are created to represent the watershed is dependent on a user-defined stream threshold value. Watersheds may be represented in detail by many sub-basins or generally with only one sub-basin encompassing the entire delineated watershed area. Hydrologic models can be created using these different sub-basin delineations to represent the same physical area. The effects of different watershed sub-basin delineations on hydrologic process modeling can then be determined. Results showed significant differences in the model outputs across the three different sub-basin delineations used to represent the same watersheds; with an increase in sub-basin delineation detail, time to peak discharge decreased significantly while peak discharge rate increased significantly. Roy Dokka Frank Tsai Clinton Willson LSU 2009-04-17 text application/pdf http://etd.lsu.edu/docs/available/etd-04152009-122340/ http://etd.lsu.edu/docs/available/etd-04152009-122340/ en unrestricted I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached herein a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to LSU or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below and in appropriate University policies, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report.
collection NDLTD
language en
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Civil & Environmental Engineering
spellingShingle Civil & Environmental Engineering
Braud, Jason Alexander
Impact of Watershed Delineation Detail on Hydrologic Process Modeling in Low Slope Areas
description Ascension Parish, located along the Mississippi River in southern Louisiana, is a low-lying, low slope landscape that primarily drains into the tidally-influenced Lake Maurepas. The predominant method of drainage within the parish is gravity drainage. Ascension Parish is currently one of the fastest growing areas in the United States. New developments have changed the areas hydrology along with its landscape. Proper watershed delineation within the parish is critical for the management of and future improvements to the parishs drainage infrastructure. Most of the recent drainage modeling in the parish has been performed using a light detection and ranging (LIDAR) digital elevation model (DEM). There are a number of software applications available which provide automated watershed delineation tools. Most automated watershed delineation tools only require a DEM as input; however, other data, such as a stream network shapefile, can be used to force the automated watershed delineation tool to consider certain known existing conditions. Stream network shapefiles can vary in the detail they provide. By running an automated watershed delineation tool using stream networks of varying detail, the effects of their detail on the watershed delineation process can be quantified. Results showed significant differences in watershed area and watershed orientation across the three different delineations completed using different stream network inputs. The detailed stream network breached inaccurate hydrologic barriers present in the DEM. These barriers were the main cause of differences between the three sets of watersheds. When delineating a watershed, the number of sub-basins that are created to represent the watershed is dependent on a user-defined stream threshold value. Watersheds may be represented in detail by many sub-basins or generally with only one sub-basin encompassing the entire delineated watershed area. Hydrologic models can be created using these different sub-basin delineations to represent the same physical area. The effects of different watershed sub-basin delineations on hydrologic process modeling can then be determined. Results showed significant differences in the model outputs across the three different sub-basin delineations used to represent the same watersheds; with an increase in sub-basin delineation detail, time to peak discharge decreased significantly while peak discharge rate increased significantly.
author2 Roy Dokka
author_facet Roy Dokka
Braud, Jason Alexander
author Braud, Jason Alexander
author_sort Braud, Jason Alexander
title Impact of Watershed Delineation Detail on Hydrologic Process Modeling in Low Slope Areas
title_short Impact of Watershed Delineation Detail on Hydrologic Process Modeling in Low Slope Areas
title_full Impact of Watershed Delineation Detail on Hydrologic Process Modeling in Low Slope Areas
title_fullStr Impact of Watershed Delineation Detail on Hydrologic Process Modeling in Low Slope Areas
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Watershed Delineation Detail on Hydrologic Process Modeling in Low Slope Areas
title_sort impact of watershed delineation detail on hydrologic process modeling in low slope areas
publisher LSU
publishDate 2009
url http://etd.lsu.edu/docs/available/etd-04152009-122340/
work_keys_str_mv AT braudjasonalexander impactofwatersheddelineationdetailonhydrologicprocessmodelinginlowslopeareas
_version_ 1716477666554544128