Heidegger, Metaphor, and the Essence of Language
In this thesis, I address the question of Heideggers rejection of metaphor, alleging most of the commentary on this rejection has failed to confront its substance. In particular, I focus on two different interpretations, one given by Paul Ricoeur and the other by Jacques Derrida. Both of these acco...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Language: | en |
Published: |
LSU
2014
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://etd.lsu.edu/docs/available/etd-04102014-135536/ |
id |
ndltd-LSU-oai-etd.lsu.edu-etd-04102014-135536 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-LSU-oai-etd.lsu.edu-etd-04102014-1355362014-04-30T03:43:22Z Heidegger, Metaphor, and the Essence of Language Meservy, Joel Philosophy & Religious Studies In this thesis, I address the question of Heideggers rejection of metaphor, alleging most of the commentary on this rejection has failed to confront its substance. In particular, I focus on two different interpretations, one given by Paul Ricoeur and the other by Jacques Derrida. Both of these accounts place Heideggers rejection in a model of language structured by the sign relation; however, I contend Heidegger rejects metaphor precisely in order to overcome this model of language. Heidegger's few references to metaphor occur within attempts to rethink the very nature of our being-in-the-world and our relationship to language; that is, he hopes to think the co-belonging of language and body. As such, metaphor is not the best avenue to interpret Heidegger's peculiar language, particularly when such language occurs during the course of his thinking of the bodily articulation of speech. Likewise, it is most appropriate to locate Heideggers rejection of metaphor in the context of a thinking of the co-belonging of language and body. Neither Ricoeur nor Derrida take this into account, focusing instead on the status of Heideggers language in general. But Heidegger does not claim that we are never to read any of his language as metaphorical or figurative, only not to do so when he is engaged in thinking the co-belonging of body and language (the essence of language). As such, it is impossible to make a blanket assertion regarding the status of the whole range of Heideggers language. Heidegger takes pains to make clear we are not to understand his statements regarding the relationship of body and language as metaphorical, since this would retain the very model of language and body he hopes to overcome and think beyond. Ultimately, we see that Heideggers rejection of metaphor is linked to his attempt to rethink the essence of language and the human beings relationship to it; in the process, he provides a point of departure for a radical rethinking of human experience. Schufreider, Gregory Raffoul, François Sirridge, Mary LSU 2014-04-29 text application/pdf http://etd.lsu.edu/docs/available/etd-04102014-135536/ http://etd.lsu.edu/docs/available/etd-04102014-135536/ en unrestricted I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached herein a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to LSU or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below and in appropriate University policies, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report. |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
en |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
Philosophy & Religious Studies |
spellingShingle |
Philosophy & Religious Studies Meservy, Joel Heidegger, Metaphor, and the Essence of Language |
description |
In this thesis, I address the question of Heideggers rejection of metaphor, alleging most of the commentary on this rejection has failed to confront its substance. In particular, I focus on two different interpretations, one given by Paul Ricoeur and the other by Jacques Derrida. Both of these accounts place Heideggers rejection in a model of language structured by the sign relation; however, I contend Heidegger rejects metaphor precisely in order to overcome this model of language. Heidegger's few references to metaphor occur within attempts to rethink the very nature of our being-in-the-world and our relationship to language; that is, he hopes to think the co-belonging of language and body. As such, metaphor is not the best avenue to interpret Heidegger's peculiar language, particularly when such language occurs during the course of his thinking of the bodily articulation of speech.
Likewise, it is most appropriate to locate Heideggers rejection of metaphor in the context of a thinking of the co-belonging of language and body. Neither Ricoeur nor Derrida take this into account, focusing instead on the status of Heideggers language in general. But Heidegger does not claim that we are never to read any of his language as metaphorical or figurative, only not to do so when he is engaged in thinking the co-belonging of body and language (the essence of language). As such, it is impossible to make a blanket assertion regarding the status of the whole range of Heideggers language.
Heidegger takes pains to make clear we are not to understand his statements regarding the relationship of body and language as metaphorical, since this would retain the very model of language and body he hopes to overcome and think beyond. Ultimately, we see that Heideggers rejection of metaphor is linked to his attempt to rethink the essence of language and the human beings relationship to it; in the process, he provides a point of departure for a radical rethinking of human experience.
|
author2 |
Schufreider, Gregory |
author_facet |
Schufreider, Gregory Meservy, Joel |
author |
Meservy, Joel |
author_sort |
Meservy, Joel |
title |
Heidegger, Metaphor, and the Essence of Language |
title_short |
Heidegger, Metaphor, and the Essence of Language |
title_full |
Heidegger, Metaphor, and the Essence of Language |
title_fullStr |
Heidegger, Metaphor, and the Essence of Language |
title_full_unstemmed |
Heidegger, Metaphor, and the Essence of Language |
title_sort |
heidegger, metaphor, and the essence of language |
publisher |
LSU |
publishDate |
2014 |
url |
http://etd.lsu.edu/docs/available/etd-04102014-135536/ |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT meservyjoel heideggermetaphorandtheessenceoflanguage |
_version_ |
1716666301642964992 |