Factors Affecting the Efficacy of Feedback Use During Source Monitoring

The current study considers how individual differences in working memory capacity (WMC) affect feedback effectiveness. Participants, selected to have high and low WMC, first watched a video of a crime. Subsequently, a post-test questionnaire was administered concerning events taken from the video an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Groft, Stephanie
Other Authors: Lane, Sean M
Format: Others
Language:en
Published: LSU 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:http://etd.lsu.edu/docs/available/etd-04062009-231810/
id ndltd-LSU-oai-etd.lsu.edu-etd-04062009-231810
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-LSU-oai-etd.lsu.edu-etd-04062009-2318102013-01-07T22:52:08Z Factors Affecting the Efficacy of Feedback Use During Source Monitoring Groft, Stephanie Psychology The current study considers how individual differences in working memory capacity (WMC) affect feedback effectiveness. Participants, selected to have high and low WMC, first watched a video of a crime. Subsequently, a post-test questionnaire was administered concerning events taken from the video and additional information suggested to have occurred in the video. After a 10 minute filler task, participants were given a two-part memory test requiring them to identify the source of the information presented in the test statements. During the training portion of the test, half of the participants received feedback as to the accuracy of their source decisions. On the second (assessment) portion of the test, participants did not receive any feedback. Both high and low WMC participants benefited equally from the presentation of feedback; both groups significantly reduced their misattributions of suggested items to the video. There was also a trend toward better source monitoring performance on suggested items in high WMC than low WMC participants, regardless of whether they received feedback. These findings suggest that feedback may be used to improve memory accuracy without requiring substantial executive resources. Lane, Sean M Elliott, Emily Marie Hicks, Jason Mathews, Robert C LSU 2009-04-14 text application/pdf http://etd.lsu.edu/docs/available/etd-04062009-231810/ http://etd.lsu.edu/docs/available/etd-04062009-231810/ en unrestricted I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached herein a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to LSU or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below and in appropriate University policies, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report.
collection NDLTD
language en
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Psychology
spellingShingle Psychology
Groft, Stephanie
Factors Affecting the Efficacy of Feedback Use During Source Monitoring
description The current study considers how individual differences in working memory capacity (WMC) affect feedback effectiveness. Participants, selected to have high and low WMC, first watched a video of a crime. Subsequently, a post-test questionnaire was administered concerning events taken from the video and additional information suggested to have occurred in the video. After a 10 minute filler task, participants were given a two-part memory test requiring them to identify the source of the information presented in the test statements. During the training portion of the test, half of the participants received feedback as to the accuracy of their source decisions. On the second (assessment) portion of the test, participants did not receive any feedback. Both high and low WMC participants benefited equally from the presentation of feedback; both groups significantly reduced their misattributions of suggested items to the video. There was also a trend toward better source monitoring performance on suggested items in high WMC than low WMC participants, regardless of whether they received feedback. These findings suggest that feedback may be used to improve memory accuracy without requiring substantial executive resources.
author2 Lane, Sean M
author_facet Lane, Sean M
Groft, Stephanie
author Groft, Stephanie
author_sort Groft, Stephanie
title Factors Affecting the Efficacy of Feedback Use During Source Monitoring
title_short Factors Affecting the Efficacy of Feedback Use During Source Monitoring
title_full Factors Affecting the Efficacy of Feedback Use During Source Monitoring
title_fullStr Factors Affecting the Efficacy of Feedback Use During Source Monitoring
title_full_unstemmed Factors Affecting the Efficacy of Feedback Use During Source Monitoring
title_sort factors affecting the efficacy of feedback use during source monitoring
publisher LSU
publishDate 2009
url http://etd.lsu.edu/docs/available/etd-04062009-231810/
work_keys_str_mv AT groftstephanie factorsaffectingtheefficacyoffeedbackuseduringsourcemonitoring
_version_ 1716477616755572736