Factors Affecting the Efficacy of Feedback Use During Source Monitoring
The current study considers how individual differences in working memory capacity (WMC) affect feedback effectiveness. Participants, selected to have high and low WMC, first watched a video of a crime. Subsequently, a post-test questionnaire was administered concerning events taken from the video an...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Language: | en |
Published: |
LSU
2009
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://etd.lsu.edu/docs/available/etd-04062009-231810/ |
id |
ndltd-LSU-oai-etd.lsu.edu-etd-04062009-231810 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-LSU-oai-etd.lsu.edu-etd-04062009-2318102013-01-07T22:52:08Z Factors Affecting the Efficacy of Feedback Use During Source Monitoring Groft, Stephanie Psychology The current study considers how individual differences in working memory capacity (WMC) affect feedback effectiveness. Participants, selected to have high and low WMC, first watched a video of a crime. Subsequently, a post-test questionnaire was administered concerning events taken from the video and additional information suggested to have occurred in the video. After a 10 minute filler task, participants were given a two-part memory test requiring them to identify the source of the information presented in the test statements. During the training portion of the test, half of the participants received feedback as to the accuracy of their source decisions. On the second (assessment) portion of the test, participants did not receive any feedback. Both high and low WMC participants benefited equally from the presentation of feedback; both groups significantly reduced their misattributions of suggested items to the video. There was also a trend toward better source monitoring performance on suggested items in high WMC than low WMC participants, regardless of whether they received feedback. These findings suggest that feedback may be used to improve memory accuracy without requiring substantial executive resources. Lane, Sean M Elliott, Emily Marie Hicks, Jason Mathews, Robert C LSU 2009-04-14 text application/pdf http://etd.lsu.edu/docs/available/etd-04062009-231810/ http://etd.lsu.edu/docs/available/etd-04062009-231810/ en unrestricted I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached herein a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to LSU or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below and in appropriate University policies, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report. |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
en |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
Psychology |
spellingShingle |
Psychology Groft, Stephanie Factors Affecting the Efficacy of Feedback Use During Source Monitoring |
description |
The current study considers how individual differences in working memory capacity (WMC) affect feedback effectiveness. Participants, selected to have high and low WMC, first watched a video of a crime. Subsequently, a post-test questionnaire was administered concerning events taken from the video and additional information suggested to have occurred in the video. After a 10 minute filler task, participants were given a two-part memory test requiring them to identify the source of the information presented in the test statements. During the training portion of the test, half of the participants received feedback as to the accuracy of their source decisions. On the second (assessment) portion of the test, participants did not receive any feedback. Both high and low WMC participants benefited equally from the presentation of feedback; both groups significantly reduced their misattributions of suggested items to the video. There was also a trend toward better source monitoring performance on suggested items in high WMC than low WMC participants, regardless of whether they received feedback. These findings suggest that feedback may be used to improve memory accuracy without requiring substantial executive resources. |
author2 |
Lane, Sean M |
author_facet |
Lane, Sean M Groft, Stephanie |
author |
Groft, Stephanie |
author_sort |
Groft, Stephanie |
title |
Factors Affecting the Efficacy of Feedback Use During Source Monitoring |
title_short |
Factors Affecting the Efficacy of Feedback Use During Source Monitoring |
title_full |
Factors Affecting the Efficacy of Feedback Use During Source Monitoring |
title_fullStr |
Factors Affecting the Efficacy of Feedback Use During Source Monitoring |
title_full_unstemmed |
Factors Affecting the Efficacy of Feedback Use During Source Monitoring |
title_sort |
factors affecting the efficacy of feedback use during source monitoring |
publisher |
LSU |
publishDate |
2009 |
url |
http://etd.lsu.edu/docs/available/etd-04062009-231810/ |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT groftstephanie factorsaffectingtheefficacyoffeedbackuseduringsourcemonitoring |
_version_ |
1716477616755572736 |