Examining the Boundary Conditions between Cognitive Control and Interference Derived from Stimulus-based and Response-based Conflict

Cognitive control is a broad construct that defines a set of processes involved in maintaining task goals in response to interference. Working memory capacity (WMC) is a similarly defined construct that shares many overlapping functions with cognitive control. The studies presented used controlled f...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tall, Jonathan D.
Other Authors: Mathews, Robert
Format: Others
Language:en
Published: LSU 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://etd.lsu.edu/docs/available/etd-01082014-124806/
id ndltd-LSU-oai-etd.lsu.edu-etd-01082014-124806
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-LSU-oai-etd.lsu.edu-etd-01082014-1248062014-01-23T03:39:01Z Examining the Boundary Conditions between Cognitive Control and Interference Derived from Stimulus-based and Response-based Conflict Tall, Jonathan D. Psychology Cognitive control is a broad construct that defines a set of processes involved in maintaining task goals in response to interference. Working memory capacity (WMC) is a similarly defined construct that shares many overlapping functions with cognitive control. The studies presented used controlled forms of interference to identify limits, or boundary conditions, that could help clarify the relationship between cognitive control and WMC. Experiment 1 used context effects to manipulate how interference and cognitive control could overlap. A spatial Stroop/Simon task was used in which proportion congruency for each subset (e.g., Simon or spatial Stroop) was manipulated to produce a 2 x 2 arrangement. Error rates, reaction times (RT), post-error slowing, and conflict adaptation were measured. A composite WMC score was formed from multiple working memory tasks. The results demonstrate that WMC is recruited globally by proactive control processes to help maintain context-specific control and that conflict adaptation effects are not always context-specific. Experiment 2 used isolated forms of interference to examine cognitive control responses in a more structured, but limited, task. The spatial Stroop and Simon components were separated and assessed 48hrs apart. The same variables were measured. Results showed that Simon and spatial Stroop differ in proactive control, but not reactive control measures. No correlation with WMC was found in Experiment 2. Mathews, Robert Elliott, Emily Lane, Sean Hicks, Jason Wilks, Scott LSU 2014-01-22 text application/pdf http://etd.lsu.edu/docs/available/etd-01082014-124806/ http://etd.lsu.edu/docs/available/etd-01082014-124806/ en unrestricted I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached herein a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to LSU or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below and in appropriate University policies, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report.
collection NDLTD
language en
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Psychology
spellingShingle Psychology
Tall, Jonathan D.
Examining the Boundary Conditions between Cognitive Control and Interference Derived from Stimulus-based and Response-based Conflict
description Cognitive control is a broad construct that defines a set of processes involved in maintaining task goals in response to interference. Working memory capacity (WMC) is a similarly defined construct that shares many overlapping functions with cognitive control. The studies presented used controlled forms of interference to identify limits, or boundary conditions, that could help clarify the relationship between cognitive control and WMC. Experiment 1 used context effects to manipulate how interference and cognitive control could overlap. A spatial Stroop/Simon task was used in which proportion congruency for each subset (e.g., Simon or spatial Stroop) was manipulated to produce a 2 x 2 arrangement. Error rates, reaction times (RT), post-error slowing, and conflict adaptation were measured. A composite WMC score was formed from multiple working memory tasks. The results demonstrate that WMC is recruited globally by proactive control processes to help maintain context-specific control and that conflict adaptation effects are not always context-specific. Experiment 2 used isolated forms of interference to examine cognitive control responses in a more structured, but limited, task. The spatial Stroop and Simon components were separated and assessed 48hrs apart. The same variables were measured. Results showed that Simon and spatial Stroop differ in proactive control, but not reactive control measures. No correlation with WMC was found in Experiment 2.
author2 Mathews, Robert
author_facet Mathews, Robert
Tall, Jonathan D.
author Tall, Jonathan D.
author_sort Tall, Jonathan D.
title Examining the Boundary Conditions between Cognitive Control and Interference Derived from Stimulus-based and Response-based Conflict
title_short Examining the Boundary Conditions between Cognitive Control and Interference Derived from Stimulus-based and Response-based Conflict
title_full Examining the Boundary Conditions between Cognitive Control and Interference Derived from Stimulus-based and Response-based Conflict
title_fullStr Examining the Boundary Conditions between Cognitive Control and Interference Derived from Stimulus-based and Response-based Conflict
title_full_unstemmed Examining the Boundary Conditions between Cognitive Control and Interference Derived from Stimulus-based and Response-based Conflict
title_sort examining the boundary conditions between cognitive control and interference derived from stimulus-based and response-based conflict
publisher LSU
publishDate 2014
url http://etd.lsu.edu/docs/available/etd-01082014-124806/
work_keys_str_mv AT talljonathand examiningtheboundaryconditionsbetweencognitivecontrolandinterferencederivedfromstimulusbasedandresponsebasedconflict
_version_ 1716627235893411840