Intellectual property in standards

Standards are complex phenomena that exist in almost every area of human life, whether in the form of language, stock scenes in literature and films, computer user interfaces or protocols that allow data transfer over the internet. They are important building blocks for any form of human activity...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Fraessdorf, Henning
Other Authors: Lametti, David (advisor)
Format: Others
Language:en
Published: McGill University 2002
Subjects:
Online Access:http://digitool.Library.McGill.CA:80/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=78214
id ndltd-LACETR-oai-collectionscanada.gc.ca-QMM.78214
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-LACETR-oai-collectionscanada.gc.ca-QMM.782142014-02-13T03:44:48ZIntellectual property in standardsFraessdorf, HenningStandardizationStandardization -- Law and legislationIndustrial propertyStandards are complex phenomena that exist in almost every area of human life, whether in the form of language, stock scenes in literature and films, computer user interfaces or protocols that allow data transfer over the internet. They are important building blocks for any form of human activity. Property rights in standards, provided by the laws of intellectual property, can foster their development by giving incentives to create technologies or works that are capable to become standards; but property rights can also impede further innovation since they allow the owner to exclude others from the use of the protected standard. Furthermore, standards are perceived to offer higher returns in form of royalties than "regular" technologies. In this context, standardization has been used as an argument to reduce the scope of protection for standard technologies with respect to computer user interfaces.The thesis evaluates the soundness of a general argument of standardization for weaker protection in intellectual property law. It elaborates the arguments that are put forward to justify weaker protection in standards regarding the characteristics of standards and standardization as well as the justifications for intellectual property. It analyses the applicability of trademark, copyright and patent law to both already existing as well as developing standards. In particular, the concepts of genericness and descriptiveness in trademark law, the merger and scenes a faire doctrines in copyright law and the doctrines of patent misuse and patent abuse in patent law are discussed.McGill UniversityLametti, David (advisor)2002Electronic Thesis or Dissertationapplication/pdfenalephsysno: 001983350proquestno: AAIMQ88121Theses scanned by UMI/ProQuest.All items in eScholarship@McGill are protected by copyright with all rights reserved unless otherwise indicated.Master of Laws (Institute of Comparative Law.) http://digitool.Library.McGill.CA:80/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=78214
collection NDLTD
language en
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Standardization
Standardization -- Law and legislation
Industrial property
spellingShingle Standardization
Standardization -- Law and legislation
Industrial property
Fraessdorf, Henning
Intellectual property in standards
description Standards are complex phenomena that exist in almost every area of human life, whether in the form of language, stock scenes in literature and films, computer user interfaces or protocols that allow data transfer over the internet. They are important building blocks for any form of human activity. Property rights in standards, provided by the laws of intellectual property, can foster their development by giving incentives to create technologies or works that are capable to become standards; but property rights can also impede further innovation since they allow the owner to exclude others from the use of the protected standard. Furthermore, standards are perceived to offer higher returns in form of royalties than "regular" technologies. In this context, standardization has been used as an argument to reduce the scope of protection for standard technologies with respect to computer user interfaces. === The thesis evaluates the soundness of a general argument of standardization for weaker protection in intellectual property law. It elaborates the arguments that are put forward to justify weaker protection in standards regarding the characteristics of standards and standardization as well as the justifications for intellectual property. It analyses the applicability of trademark, copyright and patent law to both already existing as well as developing standards. In particular, the concepts of genericness and descriptiveness in trademark law, the merger and scenes a faire doctrines in copyright law and the doctrines of patent misuse and patent abuse in patent law are discussed.
author2 Lametti, David (advisor)
author_facet Lametti, David (advisor)
Fraessdorf, Henning
author Fraessdorf, Henning
author_sort Fraessdorf, Henning
title Intellectual property in standards
title_short Intellectual property in standards
title_full Intellectual property in standards
title_fullStr Intellectual property in standards
title_full_unstemmed Intellectual property in standards
title_sort intellectual property in standards
publisher McGill University
publishDate 2002
url http://digitool.Library.McGill.CA:80/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=78214
work_keys_str_mv AT fraessdorfhenning intellectualpropertyinstandards
_version_ 1716638210581331968