Summation characteristics of the neural network subserving self-stimulation reward

This research examines the summation characteristics of the neural network subserving self-stimulation reward. The data show that the neural network has two integrators that sum the signals produced by brain stimulation. The time constant of the first integrator is approximately 450 msec, whereas th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mason, Patrick Alan.
Format: Others
Language:en
Published: McGill University 1984
Subjects:
Online Access:http://digitool.Library.McGill.CA:80/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=72006
id ndltd-LACETR-oai-collectionscanada.gc.ca-QMM.72006
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-LACETR-oai-collectionscanada.gc.ca-QMM.720062014-02-13T04:08:15ZSummation characteristics of the neural network subserving self-stimulation rewardMason, Patrick Alan.Brain stimulation.Reinforcement (Psychology)Reward (Psychology)This research examines the summation characteristics of the neural network subserving self-stimulation reward. The data show that the neural network has two integrators that sum the signals produced by brain stimulation. The time constant of the first integrator is approximately 450 msec, whereas that of the second integrator is approximately 6.5 sec. Furthermore, these integrators are sensitive to the spatiotemporal arrival of the signals.When prolonged stimulation is delivered at a high pulse frequency, the initial pulses contribute the most to the rewarding effect. Later pulses are affected by the reduced ability of the neurons or synapses to transmit signals along the neural network due to fatigue.A fatigue effect may be dissipated by splitting a pulse train into two parts by an interval of no stimulation. This should increase the rewarding effectiveness of the pulse train. However, the rewarding effectiveness is dependent upon the duration of the interval of no stimulation and the magnitude of the two pulse-train halves. A long interval of no stimulation combined with a low stimulation magnitude may cause a frustration response and a decay in memory of the associations between the response, first pulse-train half, and second pulse-train half. These would make the rewarding effectiveness of the two pulse-train halves lower than that of a continuous pulse train.Previous models of summation are unable to predict the present results. The data are explained in terms of a newly developed model of summation involving two central integrators and fatigue.McGill University1984Electronic Thesis or Dissertationapplication/pdfenalephsysno: 000220755proquestno: AAINL20870Theses scanned by UMI/ProQuest.All items in eScholarship@McGill are protected by copyright with all rights reserved unless otherwise indicated.Doctor of Philosophy (Department of Psychology.) http://digitool.Library.McGill.CA:80/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=72006
collection NDLTD
language en
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Brain stimulation.
Reinforcement (Psychology)
Reward (Psychology)
spellingShingle Brain stimulation.
Reinforcement (Psychology)
Reward (Psychology)
Mason, Patrick Alan.
Summation characteristics of the neural network subserving self-stimulation reward
description This research examines the summation characteristics of the neural network subserving self-stimulation reward. The data show that the neural network has two integrators that sum the signals produced by brain stimulation. The time constant of the first integrator is approximately 450 msec, whereas that of the second integrator is approximately 6.5 sec. Furthermore, these integrators are sensitive to the spatiotemporal arrival of the signals. === When prolonged stimulation is delivered at a high pulse frequency, the initial pulses contribute the most to the rewarding effect. Later pulses are affected by the reduced ability of the neurons or synapses to transmit signals along the neural network due to fatigue. === A fatigue effect may be dissipated by splitting a pulse train into two parts by an interval of no stimulation. This should increase the rewarding effectiveness of the pulse train. However, the rewarding effectiveness is dependent upon the duration of the interval of no stimulation and the magnitude of the two pulse-train halves. A long interval of no stimulation combined with a low stimulation magnitude may cause a frustration response and a decay in memory of the associations between the response, first pulse-train half, and second pulse-train half. These would make the rewarding effectiveness of the two pulse-train halves lower than that of a continuous pulse train. === Previous models of summation are unable to predict the present results. The data are explained in terms of a newly developed model of summation involving two central integrators and fatigue.
author Mason, Patrick Alan.
author_facet Mason, Patrick Alan.
author_sort Mason, Patrick Alan.
title Summation characteristics of the neural network subserving self-stimulation reward
title_short Summation characteristics of the neural network subserving self-stimulation reward
title_full Summation characteristics of the neural network subserving self-stimulation reward
title_fullStr Summation characteristics of the neural network subserving self-stimulation reward
title_full_unstemmed Summation characteristics of the neural network subserving self-stimulation reward
title_sort summation characteristics of the neural network subserving self-stimulation reward
publisher McGill University
publishDate 1984
url http://digitool.Library.McGill.CA:80/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=72006
work_keys_str_mv AT masonpatrickalan summationcharacteristicsoftheneuralnetworksubservingselfstimulationreward
_version_ 1716646011435220992