An economic analysis for subsurface irrigation of maize in Quebec /
The purposes of this thesis are to examine experimental results obtained with subsurface irrigation of maize in 1988, and to provide preliminary plans and an economic analysis for the subsurface irrigation of maize in Richelieu County, Quebec. A mean increase in maize yield of 3.7 % was observed in...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Others |
Language: | en |
Published: |
McGill University
1989
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://digitool.Library.McGill.CA:80/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=59547 |
id |
ndltd-LACETR-oai-collectionscanada.gc.ca-QMM.59547 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-LACETR-oai-collectionscanada.gc.ca-QMM.595472014-02-13T04:04:27ZAn economic analysis for subsurface irrigation of maize in Quebec /Drouet, Marc PhilippeCorn -- Irrigation -- Québec (Province).Irrigation farming -- Economic aspects -- Québec (Province).Subirrigation -- Economic aspects -- Québec (Province).The purposes of this thesis are to examine experimental results obtained with subsurface irrigation of maize in 1988, and to provide preliminary plans and an economic analysis for the subsurface irrigation of maize in Richelieu County, Quebec. A mean increase in maize yield of 3.7 % was observed in 1988 on experimental plots with subsurface irrigation at the Charbonneau farm. However, a review of results obtained at the same experimental site from 1982 to 1988 indicated that the mean increase in maize yield with subsurface irrigation was 29 %.Plans for two possible water supply systems designed to provide 180 mm a year of irrigation water for the subsurface irrigation of 1,250 ha in Richelieu County were considered. An economic analysis indicates that subsurface irrigation using groundwater has the greatest net benefits with an internal rate of return of 22.92 % and benefit to cost ratios of 1.90, 1.72 and 1.56 for discount rates of 8 %, 10 % and 12 % respectively. However, much of the groundwater in this region is saline and its use for irrigation may need to be restricted. Subsurface Irrigation using surface water from the Yamaska River was also profitable with an internal rate of return of 17.31 % and benefit to cost ratios of 1.66, 1.46 and 1.30 for the same discount rates.McGill University1989Electronic Thesis or Dissertationapplication/pdfenalephsysno: 001070635proquestno: AAIMM63685Theses scanned by UMI/ProQuest.All items in eScholarship@McGill are protected by copyright with all rights reserved unless otherwise indicated.Master of Science (Department of Agricultural Engineering.) http://digitool.Library.McGill.CA:80/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=59547 |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
en |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
Corn -- Irrigation -- Québec (Province). Irrigation farming -- Economic aspects -- Québec (Province). Subirrigation -- Economic aspects -- Québec (Province). |
spellingShingle |
Corn -- Irrigation -- Québec (Province). Irrigation farming -- Economic aspects -- Québec (Province). Subirrigation -- Economic aspects -- Québec (Province). Drouet, Marc Philippe An economic analysis for subsurface irrigation of maize in Quebec / |
description |
The purposes of this thesis are to examine experimental results obtained with subsurface irrigation of maize in 1988, and to provide preliminary plans and an economic analysis for the subsurface irrigation of maize in Richelieu County, Quebec. A mean increase in maize yield of 3.7 % was observed in 1988 on experimental plots with subsurface irrigation at the Charbonneau farm. However, a review of results obtained at the same experimental site from 1982 to 1988 indicated that the mean increase in maize yield with subsurface irrigation was 29 %. === Plans for two possible water supply systems designed to provide 180 mm a year of irrigation water for the subsurface irrigation of 1,250 ha in Richelieu County were considered. An economic analysis indicates that subsurface irrigation using groundwater has the greatest net benefits with an internal rate of return of 22.92 % and benefit to cost ratios of 1.90, 1.72 and 1.56 for discount rates of 8 %, 10 % and 12 % respectively. However, much of the groundwater in this region is saline and its use for irrigation may need to be restricted. Subsurface Irrigation using surface water from the Yamaska River was also profitable with an internal rate of return of 17.31 % and benefit to cost ratios of 1.66, 1.46 and 1.30 for the same discount rates. |
author |
Drouet, Marc Philippe |
author_facet |
Drouet, Marc Philippe |
author_sort |
Drouet, Marc Philippe |
title |
An economic analysis for subsurface irrigation of maize in Quebec / |
title_short |
An economic analysis for subsurface irrigation of maize in Quebec / |
title_full |
An economic analysis for subsurface irrigation of maize in Quebec / |
title_fullStr |
An economic analysis for subsurface irrigation of maize in Quebec / |
title_full_unstemmed |
An economic analysis for subsurface irrigation of maize in Quebec / |
title_sort |
economic analysis for subsurface irrigation of maize in quebec / |
publisher |
McGill University |
publishDate |
1989 |
url |
http://digitool.Library.McGill.CA:80/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=59547 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT drouetmarcphilippe aneconomicanalysisforsubsurfaceirrigationofmaizeinquebec AT drouetmarcphilippe economicanalysisforsubsurfaceirrigationofmaizeinquebec |
_version_ |
1716644631939121152 |