Le renouveau du traitement des entreprises communes en droit européen de la concurrence /

The assessment of joint venture appears to be one of the most difficult issues in European competition law. A rational and well-balanced treatment is long awaited. Indeed, the artificial distinction between co-operative and concentrative joint ventures was based on complex and contradictory criteria...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nouvel, Laurent.
Other Authors: Winter, J. A. (advisor)
Format: Others
Language:fr
Published: McGill University 2000
Subjects:
Online Access:http://digitool.Library.McGill.CA:80/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=30803
id ndltd-LACETR-oai-collectionscanada.gc.ca-QMM.30803
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-LACETR-oai-collectionscanada.gc.ca-QMM.308032014-02-13T03:46:18ZLe renouveau du traitement des entreprises communes en droit européen de la concurrence /Nouvel, Laurent.Joint ventures -- European Union countries.Consolidation and merger of corporations -- European Union countries.Antitrust law -- European Union countries.The assessment of joint venture appears to be one of the most difficult issues in European competition law. A rational and well-balanced treatment is long awaited. Indeed, the artificial distinction between co-operative and concentrative joint ventures was based on complex and contradictory criteria. The European Commission applied them flexibly at the expense of predictability, damaging the legal certainty that is so necessary for these transactions. The existence of two distinct regimes, one for concentrative and one for co-operative joint ventures, with more favourable treatment for the former, explains why firms wished to subject their transactions to the Merger Regulation rather than article 81 of the Treaty. The reform of the Merger Regulation, which entered into force in 1998, modifies the boundaries between the different types of joint ventures, now focusing on structural criterion. It gives birth to a new distinction between structural and behavioural joint ventures. This simplification of the qualification phase, however, raises new questions relating to the content and the relevance of the chosen criterion. (Abstract shortened by UMI.)McGill UniversityWinter, J. A. (advisor)2000Electronic Thesis or Dissertationapplication/pdffralephsysno: 001783995proquestno: MQ70355Theses scanned by UMI/ProQuest.All items in eScholarship@McGill are protected by copyright with all rights reserved unless otherwise indicated.Master of Laws (Institute of Comparative Law.) http://digitool.Library.McGill.CA:80/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=30803
collection NDLTD
language fr
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Joint ventures -- European Union countries.
Consolidation and merger of corporations -- European Union countries.
Antitrust law -- European Union countries.
spellingShingle Joint ventures -- European Union countries.
Consolidation and merger of corporations -- European Union countries.
Antitrust law -- European Union countries.
Nouvel, Laurent.
Le renouveau du traitement des entreprises communes en droit européen de la concurrence /
description The assessment of joint venture appears to be one of the most difficult issues in European competition law. A rational and well-balanced treatment is long awaited. Indeed, the artificial distinction between co-operative and concentrative joint ventures was based on complex and contradictory criteria. The European Commission applied them flexibly at the expense of predictability, damaging the legal certainty that is so necessary for these transactions. The existence of two distinct regimes, one for concentrative and one for co-operative joint ventures, with more favourable treatment for the former, explains why firms wished to subject their transactions to the Merger Regulation rather than article 81 of the Treaty. The reform of the Merger Regulation, which entered into force in 1998, modifies the boundaries between the different types of joint ventures, now focusing on structural criterion. It gives birth to a new distinction between structural and behavioural joint ventures. This simplification of the qualification phase, however, raises new questions relating to the content and the relevance of the chosen criterion. (Abstract shortened by UMI.)
author2 Winter, J. A. (advisor)
author_facet Winter, J. A. (advisor)
Nouvel, Laurent.
author Nouvel, Laurent.
author_sort Nouvel, Laurent.
title Le renouveau du traitement des entreprises communes en droit européen de la concurrence /
title_short Le renouveau du traitement des entreprises communes en droit européen de la concurrence /
title_full Le renouveau du traitement des entreprises communes en droit européen de la concurrence /
title_fullStr Le renouveau du traitement des entreprises communes en droit européen de la concurrence /
title_full_unstemmed Le renouveau du traitement des entreprises communes en droit européen de la concurrence /
title_sort le renouveau du traitement des entreprises communes en droit européen de la concurrence /
publisher McGill University
publishDate 2000
url http://digitool.Library.McGill.CA:80/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=30803
work_keys_str_mv AT nouvellaurent lerenouveaudutraitementdesentreprisescommunesendroiteuropeendelaconcurrence
_version_ 1716638720366477312