Cooperative learning in a secondary school physical education program

The purpose of this study was to describe and interpret cooperative learning in a secondary school physical education program. A multiple-method case study design was used to investigate the physical education environment. One eighth grade girls handball class in its first year of cooperative learni...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Strachan, Kevin.
Other Authors: Dyson, Ben P. (advisor)
Format: Others
Language:en
Published: McGill University 1996
Subjects:
Online Access:http://digitool.Library.McGill.CA:80/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=26760
id ndltd-LACETR-oai-collectionscanada.gc.ca-QMM.26760
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-LACETR-oai-collectionscanada.gc.ca-QMM.267602014-02-13T04:06:49ZCooperative learning in a secondary school physical education programStrachan, Kevin.Physical education and training -- Study and teaching (Secondary)Group work in education.The purpose of this study was to describe and interpret cooperative learning in a secondary school physical education program. A multiple-method case study design was used to investigate the physical education environment. One eighth grade girls handball class in its first year of cooperative learning was compared to an eleventh grade girls handball class in its fourth year of cooperative learning. The qualitative inquiry included interviewing the students and the physical education teacher, taking field notes, and analysing relevant documents. A modified version of the task structure observational system (Siedentop, 1994) was used as a quantitative measure of the instructional ecology of the two physical education classes. Data revealed that both classes had low management, transition, and wait times. The grade eleven class spent less time in instruction and more time in engagement than the grade eight class. Both classes showed a similar amount of opportunities to respond during activity, but the eleventh grade class exhibited higher successful student responses. The cognitive engagement was integral to the functioning of both units. This included time used by the students, instead of direct instruction by the teacher, for learning a skill, reviewing material learned, planning a strategy at the beginning of a game, implementing change in activity during the game, and reflecting on activity after the game. The study revealed that both teacher and students understood and could visibly see the benefits that cooperative learning offered to the physical education program. This example of cooperative learning in physical education incorporated the basic elements of positive interdependence, individual accountability, face-to-face interaction, social and interpersonal skills, and group processing, which are germane to effective cooperative learning.McGill UniversityDyson, Ben P. (advisor)1996Electronic Thesis or Dissertationapplication/pdfenalephsysno: 001556093proquestno: MQ29570Theses scanned by UMI/ProQuest.All items in eScholarship@McGill are protected by copyright with all rights reserved unless otherwise indicated.Master of Arts (Department of Physical Education.) http://digitool.Library.McGill.CA:80/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=26760
collection NDLTD
language en
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Physical education and training -- Study and teaching (Secondary)
Group work in education.
spellingShingle Physical education and training -- Study and teaching (Secondary)
Group work in education.
Strachan, Kevin.
Cooperative learning in a secondary school physical education program
description The purpose of this study was to describe and interpret cooperative learning in a secondary school physical education program. A multiple-method case study design was used to investigate the physical education environment. One eighth grade girls handball class in its first year of cooperative learning was compared to an eleventh grade girls handball class in its fourth year of cooperative learning. The qualitative inquiry included interviewing the students and the physical education teacher, taking field notes, and analysing relevant documents. A modified version of the task structure observational system (Siedentop, 1994) was used as a quantitative measure of the instructional ecology of the two physical education classes. Data revealed that both classes had low management, transition, and wait times. The grade eleven class spent less time in instruction and more time in engagement than the grade eight class. Both classes showed a similar amount of opportunities to respond during activity, but the eleventh grade class exhibited higher successful student responses. The cognitive engagement was integral to the functioning of both units. This included time used by the students, instead of direct instruction by the teacher, for learning a skill, reviewing material learned, planning a strategy at the beginning of a game, implementing change in activity during the game, and reflecting on activity after the game. The study revealed that both teacher and students understood and could visibly see the benefits that cooperative learning offered to the physical education program. This example of cooperative learning in physical education incorporated the basic elements of positive interdependence, individual accountability, face-to-face interaction, social and interpersonal skills, and group processing, which are germane to effective cooperative learning.
author2 Dyson, Ben P. (advisor)
author_facet Dyson, Ben P. (advisor)
Strachan, Kevin.
author Strachan, Kevin.
author_sort Strachan, Kevin.
title Cooperative learning in a secondary school physical education program
title_short Cooperative learning in a secondary school physical education program
title_full Cooperative learning in a secondary school physical education program
title_fullStr Cooperative learning in a secondary school physical education program
title_full_unstemmed Cooperative learning in a secondary school physical education program
title_sort cooperative learning in a secondary school physical education program
publisher McGill University
publishDate 1996
url http://digitool.Library.McGill.CA:80/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=26760
work_keys_str_mv AT strachankevin cooperativelearninginasecondaryschoolphysicaleducationprogram
_version_ 1716645382431178752