Soil physical properties under the influence of different mechanical weeders

Mechanical weeders were tested on both mineral and organic soils in 1995 and in 1996, to measure their impact on soil physical properties. The weeders were tested in three crops, carrots in mineral and organic soil, beans in mineral soil, and lettuce in organic soil. Soil bulk density and water cont...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Richman, Jacinda.
Other Authors: Mehuys, G. R. (advisor)
Format: Others
Language:en
Published: McGill University 1997
Subjects:
Online Access:http://digitool.Library.McGill.CA:80/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=20280
id ndltd-LACETR-oai-collectionscanada.gc.ca-QMM.20280
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-LACETR-oai-collectionscanada.gc.ca-QMM.202802014-02-13T03:56:53ZSoil physical properties under the influence of different mechanical weedersRichman, Jacinda.Soil physics.Cultivators.Weeds -- Control -- Equipment and supplies.Mechanical weeders were tested on both mineral and organic soils in 1995 and in 1996, to measure their impact on soil physical properties. The weeders were tested in three crops, carrots in mineral and organic soil, beans in mineral soil, and lettuce in organic soil. Soil bulk density and water content were measured at regular intervals during the weeder trial period, and samples for soil structural analysis were collected in the mineral soil at the beginning and at the end of each season.No significant results were found in differences in mean weight diameters of dry and water-stable aggregates. Soil moisture did not vary significantly due to treatment. There was significant compaction caused by the first pass in the field (i.e., seeder) in all the crops at both sites in the 0--10 cm layer, and in some cases, to a depth of 25 cm. Additional field passes with the weeders caused some compaction in the tractor wheel at the 0--10 cm depth, and sometimes in the 10--25 cm layer, in all trials in mineral soil, yet no significant effects of treatments were detected in the trials at the organic soil site. No conclusions could be drawn as to the benefits and/or negative impacts of mechanical versus chemical weeding in mineral soil, with respect to the relative compaction caused by the mechanical weeders. This is because in this experiment spraying of herbicides did not involve tractor traffic in the field.McGill UniversityMehuys, G. R. (advisor)1997Electronic Thesis or Dissertationapplication/pdfenalephsysno: 001608582proquestno: MQ44259Theses scanned by UMI/ProQuest.All items in eScholarship@McGill are protected by copyright with all rights reserved unless otherwise indicated.Master of Science (Department of Natural Resource Sciences.) http://digitool.Library.McGill.CA:80/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=20280
collection NDLTD
language en
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Soil physics.
Cultivators.
Weeds -- Control -- Equipment and supplies.
spellingShingle Soil physics.
Cultivators.
Weeds -- Control -- Equipment and supplies.
Richman, Jacinda.
Soil physical properties under the influence of different mechanical weeders
description Mechanical weeders were tested on both mineral and organic soils in 1995 and in 1996, to measure their impact on soil physical properties. The weeders were tested in three crops, carrots in mineral and organic soil, beans in mineral soil, and lettuce in organic soil. Soil bulk density and water content were measured at regular intervals during the weeder trial period, and samples for soil structural analysis were collected in the mineral soil at the beginning and at the end of each season. === No significant results were found in differences in mean weight diameters of dry and water-stable aggregates. Soil moisture did not vary significantly due to treatment. There was significant compaction caused by the first pass in the field (i.e., seeder) in all the crops at both sites in the 0--10 cm layer, and in some cases, to a depth of 25 cm. Additional field passes with the weeders caused some compaction in the tractor wheel at the 0--10 cm depth, and sometimes in the 10--25 cm layer, in all trials in mineral soil, yet no significant effects of treatments were detected in the trials at the organic soil site. No conclusions could be drawn as to the benefits and/or negative impacts of mechanical versus chemical weeding in mineral soil, with respect to the relative compaction caused by the mechanical weeders. This is because in this experiment spraying of herbicides did not involve tractor traffic in the field.
author2 Mehuys, G. R. (advisor)
author_facet Mehuys, G. R. (advisor)
Richman, Jacinda.
author Richman, Jacinda.
author_sort Richman, Jacinda.
title Soil physical properties under the influence of different mechanical weeders
title_short Soil physical properties under the influence of different mechanical weeders
title_full Soil physical properties under the influence of different mechanical weeders
title_fullStr Soil physical properties under the influence of different mechanical weeders
title_full_unstemmed Soil physical properties under the influence of different mechanical weeders
title_sort soil physical properties under the influence of different mechanical weeders
publisher McGill University
publishDate 1997
url http://digitool.Library.McGill.CA:80/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=20280
work_keys_str_mv AT richmanjacinda soilphysicalpropertiesundertheinfluenceofdifferentmechanicalweeders
_version_ 1716641961201369088