Density, viscosity and surface area relationship in grinding.

The first attempts to rationalize comminution were made by Rittinger in 1867 and Kick in 1885 (1, 2, 3, 4). Rittinger postulated that: “The increase of the surfaces exposed is directly proportional to the force required.” Kick countered that: “The energy needed for producing analogous changes of con...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sirois, Louis. L.
Other Authors: Salman, T. (Supervisor)
Format: Others
Language:en
Published: McGill University 1961
Subjects:
Online Access:http://digitool.Library.McGill.CA:80/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=113529
id ndltd-LACETR-oai-collectionscanada.gc.ca-QMM.113529
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-LACETR-oai-collectionscanada.gc.ca-QMM.1135292014-02-13T03:45:50ZDensity, viscosity and surface area relationship in grinding.Sirois, Louis. L.Mining Engineering.The first attempts to rationalize comminution were made by Rittinger in 1867 and Kick in 1885 (1, 2, 3, 4). Rittinger postulated that: “The increase of the surfaces exposed is directly proportional to the force required.” Kick countered that: “The energy needed for producing analogous changes of configuration in geometrically similar bodies of equal technological state varies as the volumes or weights of these bodies.” According to Rittinger, since the surface formed in each stage is double, the energy required to produce each successive stage increases in geometric progression, the ratio being two.McGill UniversitySalman, T. (Supervisor)1961Electronic Thesis or Dissertationapplication/pdfenalephsysno: NNNNNNNNNTheses scanned by McGill Library.All items in eScholarship@McGill are protected by copyright with all rights reserved unless otherwise indicated.Master of Engineering. (Department of Engineering.) http://digitool.Library.McGill.CA:80/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=113529
collection NDLTD
language en
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Mining Engineering.
spellingShingle Mining Engineering.
Sirois, Louis. L.
Density, viscosity and surface area relationship in grinding.
description The first attempts to rationalize comminution were made by Rittinger in 1867 and Kick in 1885 (1, 2, 3, 4). Rittinger postulated that: “The increase of the surfaces exposed is directly proportional to the force required.” Kick countered that: “The energy needed for producing analogous changes of configuration in geometrically similar bodies of equal technological state varies as the volumes or weights of these bodies.” According to Rittinger, since the surface formed in each stage is double, the energy required to produce each successive stage increases in geometric progression, the ratio being two.
author2 Salman, T. (Supervisor)
author_facet Salman, T. (Supervisor)
Sirois, Louis. L.
author Sirois, Louis. L.
author_sort Sirois, Louis. L.
title Density, viscosity and surface area relationship in grinding.
title_short Density, viscosity and surface area relationship in grinding.
title_full Density, viscosity and surface area relationship in grinding.
title_fullStr Density, viscosity and surface area relationship in grinding.
title_full_unstemmed Density, viscosity and surface area relationship in grinding.
title_sort density, viscosity and surface area relationship in grinding.
publisher McGill University
publishDate 1961
url http://digitool.Library.McGill.CA:80/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=113529
work_keys_str_mv AT siroislouisl densityviscosityandsurfacearearelationshipingrinding
_version_ 1716638446845427712