Infants' ability to associate different motion trajectories with animals and vehicles

Researchers have postulated that infants use motion cues (e.g., line of trajectory) to distinguish between animate and inanimate objects. However, little empirical research has addressed whether infants associate particular motion cues with object kinds. The present study examined infants' abi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Demke, Tamara
Format: Others
Published: 2002
Online Access:http://spectrum.library.concordia.ca/1827/1/MQ72857.pdf
Demke, Tamara <http://spectrum.library.concordia.ca/view/creators/Demke=3ATamara=3A=3A.html> (2002) Infants' ability to associate different motion trajectories with animals and vehicles. Masters thesis, Concordia University.
id ndltd-LACETR-oai-collectionscanada.gc.ca-QMG.1827
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-LACETR-oai-collectionscanada.gc.ca-QMG.18272013-10-22T03:41:55Z Infants' ability to associate different motion trajectories with animals and vehicles Demke, Tamara Researchers have postulated that infants use motion cues (e.g., line of trajectory) to distinguish between animate and inanimate objects. However, little empirical research has addressed whether infants associate particular motion cues with object kinds. The present study examined infants' ability to associate jumping over an obstacle with animals, and hitting an obstacle and rebounding with vehicles. An infant-controlled habituation procedure was used. Sixteen- and 20-month-old infants were habituated to two category-congruent motion events: an animal jumping over a wall and a vehicle hitting a wall and rebounding backwards. During the habituation events, a stationary animal or vehicle was placed on one side of the screen to control for novelty effect of the exemplar in the test events (e.g., if an animal was jumping over the wall, then a vehicle was stationary). Subsequently, infants were presented with two test events. In the congruent test event, the stationary animal or vehicle from the habituation events engaged in the expected motion (i.e., animal jumping or vehicle rebounding). In the incongruent event, the stationary animal or vehicle from the habituation events violated the expected motion path (i.e., an animal rebounding or a vehicle jumping). The results revealed that by 16 months of age, infants can associate different lines of trajectory with different object kinds, and are surprised when this association is violated. The results are discussed in the context of the recent developmental literature, and infants' conceptualization of animates and inanimates. 2002 Thesis NonPeerReviewed application/pdf http://spectrum.library.concordia.ca/1827/1/MQ72857.pdf Demke, Tamara <http://spectrum.library.concordia.ca/view/creators/Demke=3ATamara=3A=3A.html> (2002) Infants' ability to associate different motion trajectories with animals and vehicles. Masters thesis, Concordia University. http://spectrum.library.concordia.ca/1827/
collection NDLTD
format Others
sources NDLTD
description Researchers have postulated that infants use motion cues (e.g., line of trajectory) to distinguish between animate and inanimate objects. However, little empirical research has addressed whether infants associate particular motion cues with object kinds. The present study examined infants' ability to associate jumping over an obstacle with animals, and hitting an obstacle and rebounding with vehicles. An infant-controlled habituation procedure was used. Sixteen- and 20-month-old infants were habituated to two category-congruent motion events: an animal jumping over a wall and a vehicle hitting a wall and rebounding backwards. During the habituation events, a stationary animal or vehicle was placed on one side of the screen to control for novelty effect of the exemplar in the test events (e.g., if an animal was jumping over the wall, then a vehicle was stationary). Subsequently, infants were presented with two test events. In the congruent test event, the stationary animal or vehicle from the habituation events engaged in the expected motion (i.e., animal jumping or vehicle rebounding). In the incongruent event, the stationary animal or vehicle from the habituation events violated the expected motion path (i.e., an animal rebounding or a vehicle jumping). The results revealed that by 16 months of age, infants can associate different lines of trajectory with different object kinds, and are surprised when this association is violated. The results are discussed in the context of the recent developmental literature, and infants' conceptualization of animates and inanimates.
author Demke, Tamara
spellingShingle Demke, Tamara
Infants' ability to associate different motion trajectories with animals and vehicles
author_facet Demke, Tamara
author_sort Demke, Tamara
title Infants' ability to associate different motion trajectories with animals and vehicles
title_short Infants' ability to associate different motion trajectories with animals and vehicles
title_full Infants' ability to associate different motion trajectories with animals and vehicles
title_fullStr Infants' ability to associate different motion trajectories with animals and vehicles
title_full_unstemmed Infants' ability to associate different motion trajectories with animals and vehicles
title_sort infants' ability to associate different motion trajectories with animals and vehicles
publishDate 2002
url http://spectrum.library.concordia.ca/1827/1/MQ72857.pdf
Demke, Tamara <http://spectrum.library.concordia.ca/view/creators/Demke=3ATamara=3A=3A.html> (2002) Infants' ability to associate different motion trajectories with animals and vehicles. Masters thesis, Concordia University.
work_keys_str_mv AT demketamara infantsabilitytoassociatedifferentmotiontrajectorieswithanimalsandvehicles
_version_ 1716605672304410624