Deception and Arousal in Texas Hold ‘em Poker

In our pilot study investigating Texas Hold ‘em poker, we found that players bluffing (with a losing hand) elicits a similar physiological arousal response (as measured by skin conductance levels) to those in a position of strength and poised to win. Since arousal has been suggested to be a reinforc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lee, Jackey, Ting Hin
Language:en
Published: 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10012/7500
id ndltd-LACETR-oai-collectionscanada.gc.ca-OWTU.10012-7500
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-LACETR-oai-collectionscanada.gc.ca-OWTU.10012-75002013-10-04T04:12:25ZLee, Jackey, Ting Hin2013-04-30T20:03:50Z2013-04-30T20:03:50Z2013-04-30T20:03:50Z2013http://hdl.handle.net/10012/7500In our pilot study investigating Texas Hold ‘em poker, we found that players bluffing (with a losing hand) elicits a similar physiological arousal response (as measured by skin conductance levels) to those in a position of strength and poised to win. Since arousal has been suggested to be a reinforcing factor in problematic gambling behaviour, we sought to replicate the findings of our pilot study in the current investigation. We aimed to extend our previous findings further by: isolating truthful betting (strong betting) to disambiguate deception when players are in positions of strength (i.e. trapping), measuring subjective excitement levels and risk assessments, investigating the physiological arousal responses following wins versus losses, and finally, exploring group differences (i.e. problem gambling status, experience levels). 71 participants played 20 naturalistic rounds of Texas Hold ‘em poker for monetary rewards. We were able to replicate our previous findings that bluffing triggers a physiological arousal (as measured by skin conductance responses) similar to truthful strong betting. Trapping was also found to elicit a skin conductance response similar to both bluffing and strong betting. Measures of subjective excitement revealed a pattern that converged with physiological data. Furthermore, wins were found to be more arousing than losses. Finally, our exploratory analysis of group differences (i.e. problem gambling status, experience) proved to be an insignificant factor with all measures. We conclude that the effect of bluffing on physiological arousal is so powerful that it pervades all participants; which is problematic due to its risky nature and potential to be self-triggered. With its ever increasing popularity and availability, more research on Texas Hold ‘em poker is warranted for treatment implications.enDeceptionArousalTexas Hold 'emPokerDeception and Arousal in Texas Hold ‘em PokerThesis or DissertationPsychologyMaster of ArtsPsychology (Behavioural Neuroscience)
collection NDLTD
language en
sources NDLTD
topic Deception
Arousal
Texas Hold 'em
Poker
Psychology (Behavioural Neuroscience)
spellingShingle Deception
Arousal
Texas Hold 'em
Poker
Psychology (Behavioural Neuroscience)
Lee, Jackey, Ting Hin
Deception and Arousal in Texas Hold ‘em Poker
description In our pilot study investigating Texas Hold ‘em poker, we found that players bluffing (with a losing hand) elicits a similar physiological arousal response (as measured by skin conductance levels) to those in a position of strength and poised to win. Since arousal has been suggested to be a reinforcing factor in problematic gambling behaviour, we sought to replicate the findings of our pilot study in the current investigation. We aimed to extend our previous findings further by: isolating truthful betting (strong betting) to disambiguate deception when players are in positions of strength (i.e. trapping), measuring subjective excitement levels and risk assessments, investigating the physiological arousal responses following wins versus losses, and finally, exploring group differences (i.e. problem gambling status, experience levels). 71 participants played 20 naturalistic rounds of Texas Hold ‘em poker for monetary rewards. We were able to replicate our previous findings that bluffing triggers a physiological arousal (as measured by skin conductance responses) similar to truthful strong betting. Trapping was also found to elicit a skin conductance response similar to both bluffing and strong betting. Measures of subjective excitement revealed a pattern that converged with physiological data. Furthermore, wins were found to be more arousing than losses. Finally, our exploratory analysis of group differences (i.e. problem gambling status, experience) proved to be an insignificant factor with all measures. We conclude that the effect of bluffing on physiological arousal is so powerful that it pervades all participants; which is problematic due to its risky nature and potential to be self-triggered. With its ever increasing popularity and availability, more research on Texas Hold ‘em poker is warranted for treatment implications.
author Lee, Jackey, Ting Hin
author_facet Lee, Jackey, Ting Hin
author_sort Lee, Jackey, Ting Hin
title Deception and Arousal in Texas Hold ‘em Poker
title_short Deception and Arousal in Texas Hold ‘em Poker
title_full Deception and Arousal in Texas Hold ‘em Poker
title_fullStr Deception and Arousal in Texas Hold ‘em Poker
title_full_unstemmed Deception and Arousal in Texas Hold ‘em Poker
title_sort deception and arousal in texas hold ‘em poker
publishDate 2013
url http://hdl.handle.net/10012/7500
work_keys_str_mv AT leejackeytinghin deceptionandarousalintexasholdempoker
_version_ 1716601073804771328