Numerical Methods for Optimal Trade Execution

Optimal trade execution aims at balancing price impact and timing risk. With respect to the mathematical formulation of the optimization problem, we primarily focus on Mean Variance (MV) optimization, in which the two conflicting objectives are maximizing expected revenue (the flip side of trading i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tse, Shu Tong
Language:en
Published: 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10012/6999
id ndltd-LACETR-oai-collectionscanada.gc.ca-OWTU.10012-6999
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-LACETR-oai-collectionscanada.gc.ca-OWTU.10012-69992013-10-04T04:11:53ZTse, Shu Tong2012-09-19T20:36:26Z2012-09-19T20:36:26Z2012-09-19T20:36:26Z2012http://hdl.handle.net/10012/6999Optimal trade execution aims at balancing price impact and timing risk. With respect to the mathematical formulation of the optimization problem, we primarily focus on Mean Variance (MV) optimization, in which the two conflicting objectives are maximizing expected revenue (the flip side of trading impact) and minimizing variance of revenue (a measure of timing risk). We also consider the use of expected quadratic variation of the portfolio value process as an alternative measure of timing risk, which leads to Mean Quadratic Variation (MQV) optimization. We demonstrate that MV-optimal strategies are quite different from MQV-optimal strategies in many aspects. These differences are in stark contrast to the common belief that MQV-optimal strategies are similar to, or even the same as, MV-optimal strategies. These differences should be of interest to practitioners since we prove that the classic Almgren-Chriss strategies (industry standard) are MQV-optimal, in contrary to the common belief that they are MV-optimal. From a computational point of view, we extend theoretical results in the literature to prove that the mean variance efficient frontier computed using our method is indeed the complete Pareto-efficient frontier. First, we generalize the result in Li (2000) on the embedding technique and develop a post-processing algorithm that guarantees Pareto-optimality of numerically computed efficient frontier. Second, we extend the convergence result in Barles (1990) to viscosity solution of a system of nonlinear Hamilton Jacobi Bellman partial differential equations (HJB PDEs). On the numerical aspect, we combine the techniques of similarity reduction, non-standard interpolation, and careful grid construction to significantly improve the efficiency of our numerical methods for solving nonlinear HJB PDEs.enOptimal Trade ExecutionViscosity solutionNumerical Methods for Optimal Trade ExecutionThesis or DissertationSchool of Computer ScienceDoctor of PhilosophyComputer Science
collection NDLTD
language en
sources NDLTD
topic Optimal Trade Execution
Viscosity solution
Computer Science
spellingShingle Optimal Trade Execution
Viscosity solution
Computer Science
Tse, Shu Tong
Numerical Methods for Optimal Trade Execution
description Optimal trade execution aims at balancing price impact and timing risk. With respect to the mathematical formulation of the optimization problem, we primarily focus on Mean Variance (MV) optimization, in which the two conflicting objectives are maximizing expected revenue (the flip side of trading impact) and minimizing variance of revenue (a measure of timing risk). We also consider the use of expected quadratic variation of the portfolio value process as an alternative measure of timing risk, which leads to Mean Quadratic Variation (MQV) optimization. We demonstrate that MV-optimal strategies are quite different from MQV-optimal strategies in many aspects. These differences are in stark contrast to the common belief that MQV-optimal strategies are similar to, or even the same as, MV-optimal strategies. These differences should be of interest to practitioners since we prove that the classic Almgren-Chriss strategies (industry standard) are MQV-optimal, in contrary to the common belief that they are MV-optimal. From a computational point of view, we extend theoretical results in the literature to prove that the mean variance efficient frontier computed using our method is indeed the complete Pareto-efficient frontier. First, we generalize the result in Li (2000) on the embedding technique and develop a post-processing algorithm that guarantees Pareto-optimality of numerically computed efficient frontier. Second, we extend the convergence result in Barles (1990) to viscosity solution of a system of nonlinear Hamilton Jacobi Bellman partial differential equations (HJB PDEs). On the numerical aspect, we combine the techniques of similarity reduction, non-standard interpolation, and careful grid construction to significantly improve the efficiency of our numerical methods for solving nonlinear HJB PDEs.
author Tse, Shu Tong
author_facet Tse, Shu Tong
author_sort Tse, Shu Tong
title Numerical Methods for Optimal Trade Execution
title_short Numerical Methods for Optimal Trade Execution
title_full Numerical Methods for Optimal Trade Execution
title_fullStr Numerical Methods for Optimal Trade Execution
title_full_unstemmed Numerical Methods for Optimal Trade Execution
title_sort numerical methods for optimal trade execution
publishDate 2012
url http://hdl.handle.net/10012/6999
work_keys_str_mv AT tseshutong numericalmethodsforoptimaltradeexecution
_version_ 1716600938685267968