Not all syllogisms are created equal: Varying premise believability reveals differences between conditional and categorical syllogisms
Deductive reasoning is a fundamental cognitive skill, and consequently has been the focus of much research over the past several decades. In the realm of syllogistic reasoning—judging the validity of a conclusion given two premises—a robust finding is the belief bias effect: broadly, the tendency fo...
Main Author: | Solcz, Stephanie |
---|---|
Language: | en |
Published: |
2011
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10012/6070 |
Similar Items
-
Not all syllogisms are created equal: Varying premise believability reveals differences between conditional and categorical syllogisms
by: Solcz, Stephanie
Published: (2011) -
The Analytical Perspective of Aristotle’s Categorical and Modal Syllogisms
by: Marian Andrzej Wesoły
Published: (2018-12-01) -
The computer simulation of syllogism solving using restricted mental models
by: Inder, R.
Published: (1987) -
The Status of Conditional Syllogism in Syllogistics
by: Mahmmoud Yagoubi, et al.
Published: (2020-03-01) -
Conditionals, modals, and hypothetical syllogism
by: Walters, Lee
Published: (2014)