Speaking for the Dead: Coroners, Institutional Structures, and Risk Management

Based on interviews and ethnographic fieldwork, this dissertation shows how the Office of the Chief Coroner of Ontario (OCC) – whose object is to speak for the dead to protect the living – is shaped by risk management priorities. It illustrates how the OCC, like many contemporary organizations, has...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Leslie, Stanley Myles MacKenzie
Other Authors: Levi, Ron
Language:en_ca
Published: 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1807/31831
id ndltd-LACETR-oai-collectionscanada.gc.ca-OTU.1807-31831
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-LACETR-oai-collectionscanada.gc.ca-OTU.1807-318312013-04-17T04:19:17ZSpeaking for the Dead: Coroners, Institutional Structures, and Risk ManagementLeslie, Stanley Myles MacKenzieCoronersInstitutionsDeath InvestigationRisk Management070306270700Based on interviews and ethnographic fieldwork, this dissertation shows how the Office of the Chief Coroner of Ontario (OCC) – whose object is to speak for the dead to protect the living – is shaped by risk management priorities. It illustrates how the OCC, like many contemporary organizations, has altered its operations and decision making to manage threats to its reputation. The result of these moves has been the privatization of public safety decision making with bereaved families, the general public, and even front line coroners, increasingly excluded from speaking for the dead. This is to say, policy recommendations that shape how life in Ontario is lived tend to be generated in private sessions by OCC managers. While much of this can be attributed to the OCC’s focus on reputational risk management, there are other important factors affecting the privatization of public safety. Drawing on research in the sociology of culture, the dissertation finds that the OCC’s experience of risk management is moderated by other, layered institutional structures. These ‘institutional structures’ are analytic constructs with moral and methodological dimensions that inform the way work in the OCC is carried out. The dissertation demonstrates that the moral priorities and method preferences of doctors, lawyers, managers, families, and modern governments are layered over and under risk management. These layers augment or diminish risk management’s impact on the way death is determined and public safety regimes are developed. In addition to offering a window on death investigators and their work, the dissertation proposes a theoretical toolset for better understanding how contemporary organizations are organized and run.Levi, Ron2011-112012-01-10T18:52:09ZNO_RESTRICTION2012-01-10T18:52:09Z2012-01-10Thesishttp://hdl.handle.net/1807/31831en_ca
collection NDLTD
language en_ca
sources NDLTD
topic Coroners
Institutions
Death Investigation
Risk Management
0703
0627
0700
spellingShingle Coroners
Institutions
Death Investigation
Risk Management
0703
0627
0700
Leslie, Stanley Myles MacKenzie
Speaking for the Dead: Coroners, Institutional Structures, and Risk Management
description Based on interviews and ethnographic fieldwork, this dissertation shows how the Office of the Chief Coroner of Ontario (OCC) – whose object is to speak for the dead to protect the living – is shaped by risk management priorities. It illustrates how the OCC, like many contemporary organizations, has altered its operations and decision making to manage threats to its reputation. The result of these moves has been the privatization of public safety decision making with bereaved families, the general public, and even front line coroners, increasingly excluded from speaking for the dead. This is to say, policy recommendations that shape how life in Ontario is lived tend to be generated in private sessions by OCC managers. While much of this can be attributed to the OCC’s focus on reputational risk management, there are other important factors affecting the privatization of public safety. Drawing on research in the sociology of culture, the dissertation finds that the OCC’s experience of risk management is moderated by other, layered institutional structures. These ‘institutional structures’ are analytic constructs with moral and methodological dimensions that inform the way work in the OCC is carried out. The dissertation demonstrates that the moral priorities and method preferences of doctors, lawyers, managers, families, and modern governments are layered over and under risk management. These layers augment or diminish risk management’s impact on the way death is determined and public safety regimes are developed. In addition to offering a window on death investigators and their work, the dissertation proposes a theoretical toolset for better understanding how contemporary organizations are organized and run.
author2 Levi, Ron
author_facet Levi, Ron
Leslie, Stanley Myles MacKenzie
author Leslie, Stanley Myles MacKenzie
author_sort Leslie, Stanley Myles MacKenzie
title Speaking for the Dead: Coroners, Institutional Structures, and Risk Management
title_short Speaking for the Dead: Coroners, Institutional Structures, and Risk Management
title_full Speaking for the Dead: Coroners, Institutional Structures, and Risk Management
title_fullStr Speaking for the Dead: Coroners, Institutional Structures, and Risk Management
title_full_unstemmed Speaking for the Dead: Coroners, Institutional Structures, and Risk Management
title_sort speaking for the dead: coroners, institutional structures, and risk management
publishDate 2011
url http://hdl.handle.net/1807/31831
work_keys_str_mv AT lesliestanleymylesmackenzie speakingforthedeadcoronersinstitutionalstructuresandriskmanagement
_version_ 1716580615743078400