Compounded Discrimination and the Gonzalez v. Mexico Case: Introducing an Anti-Essentialist Framework for Compounded Discrimination/Violence against Women Cases at the Inter-American Court of Human Rights
In Gonzalez et al. v. Mexico, a case decided by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights in 2009, a context of discrimination and violence against women was known to target particular subgroups of women, of which the claimants were constituent, distinguished inter alia by their age, socioeconomic an...
Main Author: | Spratt, Beth Allison |
---|---|
Other Authors: | Cook, Rebecca J. |
Language: | en_ca |
Published: |
2011
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/1807/31450 |
Similar Items
-
Compounded Discrimination and the Gonzalez v. Mexico Case: Introducing an Anti-Essentialist Framework for Compounded Discrimination/Violence against Women Cases at the Inter-American Court of Human Rights
by: Spratt, Beth Allison
Published: (2011) -
Discrimination against women and the human rights of women
by: Žunić Natalija
Published: (2014-01-01) -
The Leap from Theory to Practice: Snapshot of Women’s Rights Through a Legal Lens
by: Brooke Stedman
Published: (2013-07-01) -
The Leap from Theory to Practice: Snapshot of Women’s Rights Through a Legal Lens
by: Brooke Stedman
Published: (2013-07-01) -
The Convention of Belém do Pará a report of its application in the jurisprudence of the Inter-American Court, 16 years after its entry into force
by: Diana Marcela Bustamante Arango, et al.
Published: (2011-06-01)