Patentability of Signals in Canada

This paper addresses the question of whether the patentability of signals is compatible with the law in Canada and attempts to develop a test for use in determining when a signal should be considered patentable subject matter. The hard-line position of the Canadian Intellectual Property Office, that...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kraemer, Damian
Other Authors: Katz, Ariel
Language:en_ca
Published: 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1807/25739
id ndltd-LACETR-oai-collectionscanada.gc.ca-OTU.1807-25739
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-LACETR-oai-collectionscanada.gc.ca-OTU.1807-257392013-04-20T05:21:42ZPatentability of Signals in CanadaKraemer, Damianpatentable subject mattersignal0398This paper addresses the question of whether the patentability of signals is compatible with the law in Canada and attempts to develop a test for use in determining when a signal should be considered patentable subject matter. The hard-line position of the Canadian Intellectual Property Office, that signals are not patentable, is shown not to be supported in law. Canada’s domestic law is, in fact, compatible with the patentability of signals. Lessons are drawn from Europe, where signals are patentable and the United States, where they are not. Various international treaties are also examined for possible obligations concerning signals. Finally, an attempt is made to formulate a workable test for the patentability of signals that is compatible with Canadian legislation and case law.Katz, Ariel2010-112011-01-07T16:24:45ZNO_RESTRICTION2011-01-07T16:24:45Z2011-01-07T16:24:45ZThesishttp://hdl.handle.net/1807/25739en_ca
collection NDLTD
language en_ca
sources NDLTD
topic patentable subject matter
signal
0398
spellingShingle patentable subject matter
signal
0398
Kraemer, Damian
Patentability of Signals in Canada
description This paper addresses the question of whether the patentability of signals is compatible with the law in Canada and attempts to develop a test for use in determining when a signal should be considered patentable subject matter. The hard-line position of the Canadian Intellectual Property Office, that signals are not patentable, is shown not to be supported in law. Canada’s domestic law is, in fact, compatible with the patentability of signals. Lessons are drawn from Europe, where signals are patentable and the United States, where they are not. Various international treaties are also examined for possible obligations concerning signals. Finally, an attempt is made to formulate a workable test for the patentability of signals that is compatible with Canadian legislation and case law.
author2 Katz, Ariel
author_facet Katz, Ariel
Kraemer, Damian
author Kraemer, Damian
author_sort Kraemer, Damian
title Patentability of Signals in Canada
title_short Patentability of Signals in Canada
title_full Patentability of Signals in Canada
title_fullStr Patentability of Signals in Canada
title_full_unstemmed Patentability of Signals in Canada
title_sort patentability of signals in canada
publishDate 2010
url http://hdl.handle.net/1807/25739
work_keys_str_mv AT kraemerdamian patentabilityofsignalsincanada
_version_ 1716583478742482944