Physical mobility and aging in intellectual disability

Background: The growing population of older adults with intellectual disabilities is likely to experience secondary disabilities that affect well-being. Despite the established importance of mobility in the general population, there is little evidence of a scientific base on mobility limitations fo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Cleaver, Shaun Robert
Other Authors: Queen's University (Kingston, Ont.). Theses (Queen's University (Kingston, Ont.))
Format: Others
Language:en
en
Published: 2007
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1974/673
id ndltd-LACETR-oai-collectionscanada.gc.ca-OKQ.1974-673
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-LACETR-oai-collectionscanada.gc.ca-OKQ.1974-6732013-12-20T03:38:34ZPhysical mobility and aging in intellectual disabilityCleaver, Shaun Robertintellectual disabilityagingmobilityhealthepidemiologysystematic reviewBackground: The growing population of older adults with intellectual disabilities is likely to experience secondary disabilities that affect well-being. Despite the established importance of mobility in the general population, there is little evidence of a scientific base on mobility limitations for people with intellectual disabilities. Objectives: The aim of this study was to better understand mobility limitations in adults with intellectual disabilities, age 45 and over, by describing the prevalence and severity of mobility limitations and determining the association with living in a high support setting. Methods: A systematic review of published literature on mobility limitations among adults with intellectual disabilities was conducted using a pre-determined search and extraction strategies. A cross-sectional study was then conducted among a representative sample of adults, age 45 and over with intellectual disabilities in South Eastern Ontario. Data was collected through standardized proxy response telephone surveys and analyzed descriptively to determine the prevalence and severity of mobility limitations in this population. A multivariate logistic regression model was then used to examine the association between mobility limitations and residential status. Results: The systematic review identified 32 publications that met all inclusion criteria. Publications were generally not focused on mobility, cross-sectional in design and few investigators addressed key methodological features in their report. Original data was collected for 128 older adults with intellectual disabilities. The prevalence of mobility limitations varied according to the definition employed. Using comparable definitions, this prevalence was higher than what is seen in the general Canadian population. The prevalence of mobility limitations was not found to increase with age but was greater in females than males. People with intellectual disabilities and mobility limitations had 3.6 times greater odds of living in high support residential settings than those without mobility limitations. This difference was statistically significant. Conclusion: Past epidemiological research on mobility limitations for people with intellectual disabilities is of poor quality. In addressing these limitations, this study found that mobility limitations are common among people with intellectual disabilities and are associated with meaningful outcomes, such as the place in which a person lives.Thesis (Master, Community Health & Epidemiology) -- Queen's University, 2007-08-23 22:56:48.77Queen's University (Kingston, Ont.). Theses (Queen's University (Kingston, Ont.))2007-08-23 22:56:48.772007-09-14T18:09:48Z2007-09-14T18:09:48Z2007-09-14T18:09:48ZThesis448923 bytesapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/1974/673enenCanadian thesesThis publication is made available by the authority of the copyright owner solely for the purpose of private study and research and may not be copied or reproduced except as permitted by the copyright laws without written authority from the copyright owner.
collection NDLTD
language en
en
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic intellectual disability
aging
mobility
health
epidemiology
systematic review
spellingShingle intellectual disability
aging
mobility
health
epidemiology
systematic review
Cleaver, Shaun Robert
Physical mobility and aging in intellectual disability
description Background: The growing population of older adults with intellectual disabilities is likely to experience secondary disabilities that affect well-being. Despite the established importance of mobility in the general population, there is little evidence of a scientific base on mobility limitations for people with intellectual disabilities. Objectives: The aim of this study was to better understand mobility limitations in adults with intellectual disabilities, age 45 and over, by describing the prevalence and severity of mobility limitations and determining the association with living in a high support setting. Methods: A systematic review of published literature on mobility limitations among adults with intellectual disabilities was conducted using a pre-determined search and extraction strategies. A cross-sectional study was then conducted among a representative sample of adults, age 45 and over with intellectual disabilities in South Eastern Ontario. Data was collected through standardized proxy response telephone surveys and analyzed descriptively to determine the prevalence and severity of mobility limitations in this population. A multivariate logistic regression model was then used to examine the association between mobility limitations and residential status. Results: The systematic review identified 32 publications that met all inclusion criteria. Publications were generally not focused on mobility, cross-sectional in design and few investigators addressed key methodological features in their report. Original data was collected for 128 older adults with intellectual disabilities. The prevalence of mobility limitations varied according to the definition employed. Using comparable definitions, this prevalence was higher than what is seen in the general Canadian population. The prevalence of mobility limitations was not found to increase with age but was greater in females than males. People with intellectual disabilities and mobility limitations had 3.6 times greater odds of living in high support residential settings than those without mobility limitations. This difference was statistically significant. Conclusion: Past epidemiological research on mobility limitations for people with intellectual disabilities is of poor quality. In addressing these limitations, this study found that mobility limitations are common among people with intellectual disabilities and are associated with meaningful outcomes, such as the place in which a person lives. === Thesis (Master, Community Health & Epidemiology) -- Queen's University, 2007-08-23 22:56:48.77
author2 Queen's University (Kingston, Ont.). Theses (Queen's University (Kingston, Ont.))
author_facet Queen's University (Kingston, Ont.). Theses (Queen's University (Kingston, Ont.))
Cleaver, Shaun Robert
author Cleaver, Shaun Robert
author_sort Cleaver, Shaun Robert
title Physical mobility and aging in intellectual disability
title_short Physical mobility and aging in intellectual disability
title_full Physical mobility and aging in intellectual disability
title_fullStr Physical mobility and aging in intellectual disability
title_full_unstemmed Physical mobility and aging in intellectual disability
title_sort physical mobility and aging in intellectual disability
publishDate 2007
url http://hdl.handle.net/1974/673
work_keys_str_mv AT cleavershaunrobert physicalmobilityandaginginintellectualdisability
_version_ 1716620745852846080