Comparing satisfaction with occupational performance using a pushrim-activated power-assisted wheelchair and a power wheelchair among task-specific power wheelchair users

The manual wheelchair (MWC) and power wheelchair (PWC) each present advantages and disadvantages to participation and occupational performance. Consequently, some individuals choose to use both devices, depending upon the activity. A pushrim-activated, power-assisted wheelchair (PPW) may provide an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Giesbrecht, Edward Mark
Other Authors: Quanbury, Arthur (Occupational Therapy) Ripat, Jacqueline (Occupational Therapy)
Format: Others
Language:en_US
Published: 2006
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1993/263
id ndltd-LACETR-oai-collectionscanada.gc.ca-MWU.anitoba.ca-dspace#1993-263
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-LACETR-oai-collectionscanada.gc.ca-MWU.anitoba.ca-dspace#1993-2632013-01-11T13:31:12ZQuanbury, Arthur (Occupational Therapy) Ripat, Jacqueline (Occupational Therapy)Giesbrecht, Edward Mark2006-07-12T17:47:11Z2006-07-12T17:47:11Z2006-07-12T17:47:11Zhttp://hdl.handle.net/1993/263The manual wheelchair (MWC) and power wheelchair (PWC) each present advantages and disadvantages to participation and occupational performance. Consequently, some individuals choose to use both devices, depending upon the activity. A pushrim-activated, power-assisted wheelchair (PPW) may provide an alternative to the PWC for these users. This study utilized a two-phase, mixed methods design, comparing the performance and satisfaction of wheelchair users carrying out self-selected activities with their current PWC and with a PPW. There was no statistically significant difference in outcome measures between the PWC and PPW; however, many participants reported a preference for the PWC. Less accessible environments, particularly when transporting a wheelchair, were identified as opportunities for PPW use. Rather than replacing the PWC for all of their identified activities, participants indicated the PPW improved upon the MWC. As a result, participants expressed a willingness to try more (and new) activities, including some previously performed with the PWC.5584059 bytesapplication/pdfen_USWheelchairPAPAWOccupational performanceParticipationAssistive technologyComparing satisfaction with occupational performance using a pushrim-activated power-assisted wheelchair and a power wheelchair among task-specific power wheelchair usersElectronic Thesis or DissertationMedical RehabilitationQuanbury, Arthur (Occupational Therapy) Ripat, Jacqueline (Occupational Therapy) Cooper, Juliette (Occupational Therapy) McIlraith, Audrey (Family Services & Housing, Government of Manitoba)Master of Science (M.Sc.)October 2006
collection NDLTD
language en_US
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Wheelchair
PAPAW
Occupational performance
Participation
Assistive technology
spellingShingle Wheelchair
PAPAW
Occupational performance
Participation
Assistive technology
Giesbrecht, Edward Mark
Comparing satisfaction with occupational performance using a pushrim-activated power-assisted wheelchair and a power wheelchair among task-specific power wheelchair users
description The manual wheelchair (MWC) and power wheelchair (PWC) each present advantages and disadvantages to participation and occupational performance. Consequently, some individuals choose to use both devices, depending upon the activity. A pushrim-activated, power-assisted wheelchair (PPW) may provide an alternative to the PWC for these users. This study utilized a two-phase, mixed methods design, comparing the performance and satisfaction of wheelchair users carrying out self-selected activities with their current PWC and with a PPW. There was no statistically significant difference in outcome measures between the PWC and PPW; however, many participants reported a preference for the PWC. Less accessible environments, particularly when transporting a wheelchair, were identified as opportunities for PPW use. Rather than replacing the PWC for all of their identified activities, participants indicated the PPW improved upon the MWC. As a result, participants expressed a willingness to try more (and new) activities, including some previously performed with the PWC. === October 2006
author2 Quanbury, Arthur (Occupational Therapy) Ripat, Jacqueline (Occupational Therapy)
author_facet Quanbury, Arthur (Occupational Therapy) Ripat, Jacqueline (Occupational Therapy)
Giesbrecht, Edward Mark
author Giesbrecht, Edward Mark
author_sort Giesbrecht, Edward Mark
title Comparing satisfaction with occupational performance using a pushrim-activated power-assisted wheelchair and a power wheelchair among task-specific power wheelchair users
title_short Comparing satisfaction with occupational performance using a pushrim-activated power-assisted wheelchair and a power wheelchair among task-specific power wheelchair users
title_full Comparing satisfaction with occupational performance using a pushrim-activated power-assisted wheelchair and a power wheelchair among task-specific power wheelchair users
title_fullStr Comparing satisfaction with occupational performance using a pushrim-activated power-assisted wheelchair and a power wheelchair among task-specific power wheelchair users
title_full_unstemmed Comparing satisfaction with occupational performance using a pushrim-activated power-assisted wheelchair and a power wheelchair among task-specific power wheelchair users
title_sort comparing satisfaction with occupational performance using a pushrim-activated power-assisted wheelchair and a power wheelchair among task-specific power wheelchair users
publishDate 2006
url http://hdl.handle.net/1993/263
work_keys_str_mv AT giesbrechtedwardmark comparingsatisfactionwithoccupationalperformanceusingapushrimactivatedpowerassistedwheelchairandapowerwheelchairamongtaskspecificpowerwheelchairusers
_version_ 1716575011033055232