Comparing satisfaction with occupational performance using a pushrim-activated power-assisted wheelchair and a power wheelchair among task-specific power wheelchair users
The manual wheelchair (MWC) and power wheelchair (PWC) each present advantages and disadvantages to participation and occupational performance. Consequently, some individuals choose to use both devices, depending upon the activity. A pushrim-activated, power-assisted wheelchair (PPW) may provide an...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Language: | en_US |
Published: |
2006
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/1993/263 |
id |
ndltd-LACETR-oai-collectionscanada.gc.ca-MWU.anitoba.ca-dspace#1993-263 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-LACETR-oai-collectionscanada.gc.ca-MWU.anitoba.ca-dspace#1993-2632013-01-11T13:31:12ZQuanbury, Arthur (Occupational Therapy) Ripat, Jacqueline (Occupational Therapy)Giesbrecht, Edward Mark2006-07-12T17:47:11Z2006-07-12T17:47:11Z2006-07-12T17:47:11Zhttp://hdl.handle.net/1993/263The manual wheelchair (MWC) and power wheelchair (PWC) each present advantages and disadvantages to participation and occupational performance. Consequently, some individuals choose to use both devices, depending upon the activity. A pushrim-activated, power-assisted wheelchair (PPW) may provide an alternative to the PWC for these users. This study utilized a two-phase, mixed methods design, comparing the performance and satisfaction of wheelchair users carrying out self-selected activities with their current PWC and with a PPW. There was no statistically significant difference in outcome measures between the PWC and PPW; however, many participants reported a preference for the PWC. Less accessible environments, particularly when transporting a wheelchair, were identified as opportunities for PPW use. Rather than replacing the PWC for all of their identified activities, participants indicated the PPW improved upon the MWC. As a result, participants expressed a willingness to try more (and new) activities, including some previously performed with the PWC.5584059 bytesapplication/pdfen_USWheelchairPAPAWOccupational performanceParticipationAssistive technologyComparing satisfaction with occupational performance using a pushrim-activated power-assisted wheelchair and a power wheelchair among task-specific power wheelchair usersElectronic Thesis or DissertationMedical RehabilitationQuanbury, Arthur (Occupational Therapy) Ripat, Jacqueline (Occupational Therapy) Cooper, Juliette (Occupational Therapy) McIlraith, Audrey (Family Services & Housing, Government of Manitoba)Master of Science (M.Sc.)October 2006 |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
en_US |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
Wheelchair PAPAW Occupational performance Participation Assistive technology |
spellingShingle |
Wheelchair PAPAW Occupational performance Participation Assistive technology Giesbrecht, Edward Mark Comparing satisfaction with occupational performance using a pushrim-activated power-assisted wheelchair and a power wheelchair among task-specific power wheelchair users |
description |
The manual wheelchair (MWC) and power wheelchair (PWC) each present advantages and disadvantages to participation and occupational performance. Consequently, some individuals choose to use both devices, depending upon the activity. A pushrim-activated, power-assisted wheelchair (PPW) may provide an alternative to the PWC for these users. This study utilized a two-phase, mixed methods design, comparing the performance and satisfaction of wheelchair users carrying out self-selected activities with their current PWC and with a PPW. There was no statistically significant difference in outcome measures between the PWC and PPW; however, many participants reported a preference for the PWC. Less accessible environments, particularly when transporting a wheelchair, were identified as opportunities for PPW use. Rather than replacing the PWC for all of their identified activities, participants indicated the PPW improved upon the MWC. As a result, participants expressed a willingness to try more (and new) activities, including some previously performed with the PWC. === October 2006 |
author2 |
Quanbury, Arthur (Occupational Therapy)
Ripat, Jacqueline (Occupational Therapy) |
author_facet |
Quanbury, Arthur (Occupational Therapy)
Ripat, Jacqueline (Occupational Therapy) Giesbrecht, Edward Mark |
author |
Giesbrecht, Edward Mark |
author_sort |
Giesbrecht, Edward Mark |
title |
Comparing satisfaction with occupational performance using a pushrim-activated power-assisted wheelchair and a power wheelchair among task-specific power wheelchair users |
title_short |
Comparing satisfaction with occupational performance using a pushrim-activated power-assisted wheelchair and a power wheelchair among task-specific power wheelchair users |
title_full |
Comparing satisfaction with occupational performance using a pushrim-activated power-assisted wheelchair and a power wheelchair among task-specific power wheelchair users |
title_fullStr |
Comparing satisfaction with occupational performance using a pushrim-activated power-assisted wheelchair and a power wheelchair among task-specific power wheelchair users |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparing satisfaction with occupational performance using a pushrim-activated power-assisted wheelchair and a power wheelchair among task-specific power wheelchair users |
title_sort |
comparing satisfaction with occupational performance using a pushrim-activated power-assisted wheelchair and a power wheelchair among task-specific power wheelchair users |
publishDate |
2006 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/1993/263 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT giesbrechtedwardmark comparingsatisfactionwithoccupationalperformanceusingapushrimactivatedpowerassistedwheelchairandapowerwheelchairamongtaskspecificpowerwheelchairusers |
_version_ |
1716575011033055232 |