Comparison of parametric and nonparametric streamflow record extension techniques

The extension of short data records, based on information from long term data records, is a common procedure used in the planning and operation of many water resources systems. Alternative methods for extending the available streamflow data record at locations where the period of recorded data is co...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sydor, Kevin
Format: Others
Language:en
en_US
Published: 2007
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1993/1475
id ndltd-LACETR-oai-collectionscanada.gc.ca-MWU.anitoba.ca-dspace#1993-1475
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-LACETR-oai-collectionscanada.gc.ca-MWU.anitoba.ca-dspace#1993-14752013-01-11T13:30:41ZSydor, Kevin2007-05-17T12:37:46Z2007-05-17T12:37:46Z1998-08-01T00:00:00Zhttp://hdl.handle.net/1993/1475The extension of short data records, based on information from long term data records, is a common procedure used in the planning and operation of many water resources systems. Alternative methods for extending the available streamflow data record at locations where the period of recorded data is considered too short are presented. Various deficiencies in existing regression-based parametric techniques related to the assumption of normally distributed and random residuals are id ntified. An alternate nonparametric approach which is not subject to the above assumptions is presented. The nonparametric method utilizes the relationship between the index and base record to identify similar flow patterns that can be used to generate streamflow data. The extension techniques were evaluated, and the results of the evaluation were verified, using monthly streamflow data from gauging stations in Manitoba and Ontario. The techniques are evaluated based on their relative performance in reproducing statistical features of the historic data. The parametric and nonparametric methods displayed comparable performance. The residual series of the parametric models did not follow the normal distribution, even though a data transformation was performed. Residual series from both techniques displayed autocorrelation, indicating the inability of the models in taking into account time varying relationships in the data. Model performance generally increased with common period of record. The nonparametric methods tended to improve as the available data increased. Recommendations are made as to the preferred approach under varying data availability conditions. The nonparametric techniques are recommended as a viable alternative in cases where the residual series obtained from the parametric models are not normally distributed. Using a nonparametric model as an alternative to a parametric model may involve a trade-off in terms of statistical performance under certain conditions. A procedure for implementing the record extension techniques is presented.12101253 bytes184 bytesapplication/pdftext/plainenen_USComparison of parametric and nonparametric streamflow record extension techniquesCivil EngineeringM.Sc.
collection NDLTD
language en
en_US
format Others
sources NDLTD
description The extension of short data records, based on information from long term data records, is a common procedure used in the planning and operation of many water resources systems. Alternative methods for extending the available streamflow data record at locations where the period of recorded data is considered too short are presented. Various deficiencies in existing regression-based parametric techniques related to the assumption of normally distributed and random residuals are id ntified. An alternate nonparametric approach which is not subject to the above assumptions is presented. The nonparametric method utilizes the relationship between the index and base record to identify similar flow patterns that can be used to generate streamflow data. The extension techniques were evaluated, and the results of the evaluation were verified, using monthly streamflow data from gauging stations in Manitoba and Ontario. The techniques are evaluated based on their relative performance in reproducing statistical features of the historic data. The parametric and nonparametric methods displayed comparable performance. The residual series of the parametric models did not follow the normal distribution, even though a data transformation was performed. Residual series from both techniques displayed autocorrelation, indicating the inability of the models in taking into account time varying relationships in the data. Model performance generally increased with common period of record. The nonparametric methods tended to improve as the available data increased. Recommendations are made as to the preferred approach under varying data availability conditions. The nonparametric techniques are recommended as a viable alternative in cases where the residual series obtained from the parametric models are not normally distributed. Using a nonparametric model as an alternative to a parametric model may involve a trade-off in terms of statistical performance under certain conditions. A procedure for implementing the record extension techniques is presented.
author Sydor, Kevin
spellingShingle Sydor, Kevin
Comparison of parametric and nonparametric streamflow record extension techniques
author_facet Sydor, Kevin
author_sort Sydor, Kevin
title Comparison of parametric and nonparametric streamflow record extension techniques
title_short Comparison of parametric and nonparametric streamflow record extension techniques
title_full Comparison of parametric and nonparametric streamflow record extension techniques
title_fullStr Comparison of parametric and nonparametric streamflow record extension techniques
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of parametric and nonparametric streamflow record extension techniques
title_sort comparison of parametric and nonparametric streamflow record extension techniques
publishDate 2007
url http://hdl.handle.net/1993/1475
work_keys_str_mv AT sydorkevin comparisonofparametricandnonparametricstreamflowrecordextensiontechniques
_version_ 1716574743425974272