The Devils Lake controversy: why Canada and the United States need a new bilateral understanding in light of the evolving law of international watercourses
Recent transboundary disputes between the United States and Canada and in particular, the dispute concerning Devils Lake outlet, call for an improvement of the agreements between the two countries that govern North American international watercourses. One way to do so is by assimilating the cooperat...
Main Author: | Signorelli, Andrea |
---|---|
Other Authors: | Schwartz, Bryan (Faculty of Law) |
Language: | en_US |
Published: |
2010
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/1993/4055 |
Similar Items
-
The Devils Lake controversy: why Canada and the United States need a new bilateral understanding in light of the evolving law of international watercourses
by: Signorelli, Andrea
Published: (2010) -
Quantifying the United Nations’ Watercourse Convention Indicators to Inform Equitable Transboundary River Sharing: Application to the Nile River Basin
by: Yared Gari, et al.
Published: (2020-09-01) -
International water law for transboundary aquifers – a global perspective
by: Raya Marina Stephan
Published: (2018-04-01) -
Divides or Connects? The Danube as an International Border and Watercourse in History
by: Zoltán Huszár, et al.
Published: (2019-12-01) -
Silala basin dispute: Implications for the interpretation of the concept of international watercourse
by: Vučić Mihajlo
Published: (2017-01-01)