| Summary: | One very popular genre of literature during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries was
advice (or prescriptive) literature, directed at husbands and wives, parents and children, masters
and servants. These books provided readers with detailed descriptions of the ideal relationships
between family members, and the duties attendant upon individuals in each position. They are
valuable to historians in this capacity, as portrayals of desired behavior, rather than as depictions
of how things actually were. The relationship between masters and servants is a particularly
difficult one to understand, for servants occupied a unique place within the family. In many ways
they were similar to the master’s children, for they were unmarried minors, and temporarily under
his authority. Yet in other ways servants were quite different from the children of the family, for
there existed between them and their masters a contract for food, wages and lodging in return for
their labor. Advice literature is a valuable source of information regarding the manner in which
seventeenth- and eighteenth-century individuals viewed the ambiguous relationship between
master and servant. However, to date the secondary literature on servants has not made much use
of advice literature, or examined its usefulness in this capacity.
This thesis seeks to present a systematic examination of the prescriptive literature for
servants published during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, comparing not only the types
of advice given to servants, but also the manner in which the advice was given. It will soon be
apparent that the literature evolved dramatically over the course of the two centuries, reflecting
both new conceptions of the nature of servitude, as well as developments in society at large.
These changes may be described as the transition from a view of servitude as a state which
imposed moral obligations on the servant, to one which saw it as a period of contractual
agreement between servant and master.
|
|---|
